Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
|
05-08-2014, 08:40 AM
|
#16
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2009
Location: Greece
Distribution: ubuntu 18.04
Posts: 89
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlinkels
When you create two documents, one in old LO, one in the most recent version of LO.
In each document you past the same JPG picture. The picture should be a reasonable size, so the size is significant as compared to the overhead, 200k or so.
When you save the two documents, is there a significant difference in size of the two?
You see, the JPG image in the old version resembles an image with a compression quality of ~80. While the image in the new version seems to be compressed with quality=30.
Now LO is not supposed to compress or change the quality. But if you compare the sizes of the two version you might see a hint in a direction.
jlinkels
|
No, not really , both jpeg images appear same size. I have already mentioned it in a previous reply. I measured the dimensions of the jpeg image with a ruler, and is identical . As a matter of fact, my jpegs are scanned with a quality of 75 , you gessed right but with the new LO appear of low quality
|
|
|
05-08-2014, 09:41 AM
|
#17
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Bonaire, Leeuwarden
Distribution: Debian /Jessie/Stretch/Sid, Linux Mint DE
Posts: 5,195
|
I understood that the size of the JPGs is different. But I want to know if the size of the LO documents is different. The .odt file.
But you need to use a JPG of decent size. It must be considerably larger than the overhead of the .odt file so any size differences of the .odt file are clear.
I want to know if LO secretly does some compression.
jlinkels
|
|
|
05-08-2014, 02:50 PM
|
#18
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2009
Location: Greece
Distribution: ubuntu 18.04
Posts: 89
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlinkels
I understood that the size of the JPGs is different. But I want to know if the size of the LO documents is different. The .odt file.
But you need to use a JPG of decent size. It must be considerably larger than the overhead of the .odt file so any size differences of the .odt file are clear.
I want to know if LO secretly does some compression.
jlinkels
|
I have an 22 inch monitor.
The size of the JPGs is same.
The size of the odt file is almost the same, in the new L.O the size is slightly bigger, about 2 mm at the vertical and no clear difference of the horizontal dimension
JPEG files are much smaller than the odt dimension. In the thumbnail, I crop a side to side part of a screenshot (the whole archive is much larger than 256 kb which is the max I can upload here.
|
|
|
05-08-2014, 03:02 PM
|
#19
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Bonaire, Leeuwarden
Distribution: Debian /Jessie/Stretch/Sid, Linux Mint DE
Posts: 5,195
|
The file size of the .ODT document.
jlinkels
|
|
|
05-09-2014, 12:21 AM
|
#20
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2009
Location: Greece
Distribution: ubuntu 18.04
Posts: 89
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlinkels
The file size of the .ODT document.
jlinkels
|
File size is identical eg 213,4 kb for a particular .odt document in both cases
|
|
|
05-09-2014, 07:16 AM
|
#21
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Bonaire, Leeuwarden
Distribution: Debian /Jessie/Stretch/Sid, Linux Mint DE
Posts: 5,195
|
Then it must be a change in the algorithm which decompresses the JPG and show it on screen. It looks like a regression error. Too bad. Have you checked the LibeOffice forums and mailing lists?
jlinkels
|
|
|
05-10-2014, 12:33 PM
|
#22
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2009
Location: Greece
Distribution: ubuntu 18.04
Posts: 89
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlinkels
Then it must be a change in the algorithm which decompresses the JPG and show it on screen. It looks like a regression error. Too bad. Have you checked the LibeOffice forums and mailing lists?
jlinkels
|
Yes, you are probably right, it looks like a regression error I already opened a thread in LO forum but no answer so far
Thank you for your help
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:41 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|