Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
04-28-2006, 12:58 AM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 178
Rep:
|
Is clam anti-virus a decent product
I was thinking about setting up a Linux server as a VPN, a caching server, a network intrusion detection system, and also using it as an anti-virus program to filter data before it gets to the client machines. I was wondering if you think this is a good idea? Also the Windows version of clam anti-virus doesn't get to many favorable reviews. I was wondering if the Linux version is any better and whether it filters for Windows viruses. Do you think it's a good choice? Suggestions?
|
|
|
04-28-2006, 01:36 AM
|
#2
|
Moderator
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,417
|
Clam has a great reputation. Many costly network appliances offer clam as an integrated virus scanning engine, along side the likes of mcaffee and f-secure. good idea all round i'd say, just be sure that the server you run it on can handle the load.
|
|
|
04-28-2006, 03:27 AM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 178
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Reply
It's not a huge network, less than 20 machines in all. My main concern is whether clam can detect Windows specific viruses. The machine I was thinking of would be about a gig with 256MB RAM. Think this is sufficent?
|
|
|
04-28-2006, 04:03 AM
|
#4
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2005
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 104
Rep:
|
I believe clam can find windows viruses, check their web site, the should have that info.
The necessary server speed depends on how much and what kind of traffic you have.
|
|
|
04-28-2006, 06:05 AM
|
#5
|
Moderator
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,417
|
virus scanning is about recognising identifiable traits in network data, you don't need to have any interest in the formats of the data or anything, just see signatures in what ever it is you're looking at.
|
|
|
04-28-2006, 06:26 AM
|
#6
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2005
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 104
Rep:
|
It won't identify viruses in attachments of encrypted emails (ssl), will it?
|
|
|
04-28-2006, 09:20 AM
|
#7
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 178
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Reply
I got that Virus Scanning is about matching signatures but I wasn't sure if the *nix version came with the Windows signatures or if there's a way I can add them. Reviews for the Windows version weren't very good so I don't know if the *nix version is any better. I also read that Clam can only detect viruses when a check is run, it won't stop you from running a program. So I was wondering if it can catch data as it hits the system.
|
|
|
04-29-2006, 02:38 PM
|
#8
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Turku, Finland
Distribution: Debian, Ubuntu, Gentoo
Posts: 388
Rep:
|
ClamAV is not ment to be a replacement for desktop antivirus programs. Last time I checked (the Unix version) it did not include realtime protection like most popular Windows antivirus programs (F-secure, McAfee, Norton etc). It is, however, quite useful in gateway computers (email servers and such) to prevent viruses from coming into the local network. Of course it can be used to do ordinary virus scans. For these purposes it is quite usable.
The Unix version does include virus signatures for Windows viruses; in fact, the vast majority of computer viruses are designed for Windows, so an antivirus program without Windows virus signatures would be next to useless.
I'm not sure about the SSL problem - check ClamAV website for that.
|
|
|
04-29-2006, 05:01 PM
|
#9
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: far enough
Distribution: OS X 10.6.7
Posts: 1,690
Rep:
|
clamav has real time(ie scan on access) virus protection. You need to install and configure the dazuko kernel module. I use avast antivirus http://www.avast.com//i_kat_207.php?lang=ENG&fnc=finish. I tried f-prot, clamav, bitdefender, antivir and others and i was quite satisfied with clamav. I use avast because like bitdefender i knew it when using windows. It is also easy to create a slackware or debian package from the avast rpm file with only gtk2 as dependency.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:11 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|