Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Hi. I've been wanting to try the new eww browser from emacs 24 but as I am on Mint Rebecca I have only version 23 in the repositories.
I compiled from source but when I start eww it poits out that it can't run because emacs was built without libxml2. Indeed when I return to my ./configure output it says that it was built without libxml2.
Thing is, I DO have libxml2:
Why can't emacs find it?. How can I point it out to the configure script manually?
this seems like a similar thread, though sadly, unanswered: http://mail-index.netbsd.org/netbsd-...msg015404.html
Maybe it's an Emacs bug?
I guess you don't/didn't have the libxml2-dev package installed.
Sorry, I should be explicit: this is not really a guess. The output from "ldconfig -p | grep libxml2" makes is quite clear that libxml2-dev is not installed. It is needed at configure/build time but not at run time.
Oh, I didn't mean eww was awesome in any technical context. I felt it was awesome because of the things I had to go through to have it. In the end I don't even expect to be using it that much. Eww was the fist thing that helped me notice I was using an old version of emacs because the repos were lagging behind. As I am verry passionate about learning emacs, I'd like to be using the latest stable version so that I don't fall into the trap of using deprecated stuff and missing on the latest features.
Oh, I didn't mean eww was awesome in any technical context. I felt it was awesome because of the things I had to go through to have it. In the end I don't even expect to be using it that much. Eww was the fist thing that helped me notice I was using an old version of emacs because the repos were lagging behind. As I am verry passionate about learning emacs, I'd like to be using the latest stable version so that I don't fall into the trap of using deprecated stuff and missing on the latest features.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.