Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I'm using iceWM, and looking over the themes, there is a narrow choice, and was wondering if someone could give me some info about configuring its look and how it acts.
I have the minimum amount of KDE installed since I have 10G paritioned off for the OS, and would like to keep the system to a minimum. Previously I had a problem with the system being slow and unreliable (Like Kopete wouldn't connect and crashed often). I backed up what I needed via email (couldn't write a CD or floppy), and now I want to get IceWM configured.
Here's the icewm homepage which seems to have some documentation on it. I haven't used icewm in a while (prefer fluxbox now for my light wm needs), but I feel like I had to install a package icepref and/or icemc (or maybe iceme). One of those let me fiddle with all the preference and the other let you configure the menus.
Going a bit off-topic, whats the big thing with Fluxbox? I've used it some, and it seems to me that alot, if not all, the light WM were more or less the same, minus a few things.
Any, whats the diff before IceWM, Fluxbox, Openbox, and any others that are out there? I don't see them, and everyone says the same things about them all, so it seems a bit of a reach to try and figure it all out from post...
I guess I enjoyed fluxbox more than icewm because at the time I didn't know how to get the rox-filer to work with icewm and give you desktop icons, but I found a tutorial on how to do it with flux. craigevil above mentions using Rox with icewm, which would be just as good.
The thing I did like about Icewm, to tell the truth was that there was an actual "start" type menu in the lower left that most of the others I've used didn't seem to have.
Now I'm just too lazy to go back and try icewm again since I managed to get flux setup the way I like and themed the way I like. I'm sure if I put in the work, I could make Icewm a fantastic choice as well.... I'm sure if you're an advanced user you'd find some features in each that were nice to have and that you'd miss using something else, but you can basically make any of them what you want them to be...
I have just moved from KDE to IceWM and it looks great to me. I have more or less the same functionalities than KDE but the programmes load much faster.
The only thing I have been unable to set is that frequent applications appear on the menu.
Could anybody help?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dralnu
I'm looking into that stuff on Ice. I appreciate the info. I'm looking it over now, actually.
That is where you can change the toolbar or AKA freqently used programs.
I used icemc to change the menu items and set icons for them. One thing about flux that i like over ice is that flux will strech the background image to my rez 1280x800 while ice wont.
Distribution: Slackware & Slamd64. What else is there?
Posts: 1,705
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dralnu
I'm using iceWM, and looking over the themes, there is a narrow choice, and was wondering if someone could give me some info about configuring its look and how it acts.
I have the minimum amount of KDE installed since I have 10G paritioned off for the OS, and would like to keep the system to a minimum. Previously I had a problem with the system being slow and unreliable (Like Kopete wouldn't connect and crashed often). I backed up what I needed via email (couldn't write a CD or floppy), and now I want to get IceWM configured.
Any hints/tips/tricks?
You can use any wallpaper you want with most wms that I know of. The themes don't really mean much unless you have to have certain buttons or colors on your bars. There are 327 icewm themes on themes.freshmeat.net, how many do you really need?
You can customize most of the terminals for transparency, titles, background pictures, whatever you want, independent of the wm so themes are not that big of a deal.
Choosing between icewm and blackbox/fluxbox can come down to whether you like having the menubar on the bottom. I use them all (and more) on different desktop machines, and have rox-filer running on all of them, and I guess I just like fluxbox the best since I like a clean desktop with no icons and no menubars so I can just have my wallpaper in all its glory. I like to do everything in menus. All of these three are pretty easy to set up. Blackbox is the biggest pain in the a$$ of the three because of the way you have to do the themes. On flux and ice you can just set your wallpaper and define your menus. On blackbox it's easier to just find a theme that's tolerable and throw out the wallpaper and modify it how you want. xfce is a little heavier and there is a lot I don't like about it but I love the way it tabs apps. That is very very nice.
For the reason why there are so many *box wms is that when somebody couldn't get a feature he wanted from the original or he wanted to go in a different direction that the devs didn't want to go they just forked and continued. It's good to use one of these because most of the stuff interchanges.
I would like to find info on windowmaker but the site has been dead for more than a month.
pj I don't know why you didn't get rox to set up the desktop icons like you wanted on ice...it should be the same everywhere but honestly I didn't try it since I like a clean desktop.
P.S. 10G is a huge desktop unless you have a lot of music and doc.
You can use any wallpaper you want with most wms that I know of. The themes don't really mean much unless you have to have certain buttons or colors on your bars. There are 327 icewm themes on themes.freshmeat.net, how many do you really need?
You can customize most of the terminals for transparency, titles, background pictures, whatever you want, independent of the wm so themes are not that big of a deal.
Choosing between icewm and blackbox/fluxbox can come down to whether you like having the menubar on the bottom. I use them all (and more) on different desktop machines, and have rox-filer running on all of them, and I guess I just like fluxbox the best since I like a clean desktop with no icons and no menubars so I can just have my wallpaper in all its glory. I like to do everything in menus. All of these three are pretty easy to set up. Blackbox is the biggest pain in the a$$ of the three because of the way you have to do the themes. On flux and ice you can just set your wallpaper and define your menus. On blackbox it's easier to just find a theme that's tolerable and throw out the wallpaper and modify it how you want. xfce is a little heavier and there is a lot I don't like about it but I love the way it tabs apps. That is very very nice.
For the reason why there are so many *box wms is that when somebody couldn't get a feature he wanted from the original or he wanted to go in a different direction that the devs didn't want to go they just forked and continued. It's good to use one of these because most of the stuff interchanges.
I would like to find info on windowmaker but the site has been dead for more than a month.
pj I don't know why you didn't get rox to set up the desktop icons like you wanted on ice...it should be the same everywhere but honestly I didn't try it since I like a clean desktop.
P.S. 10G is a huge desktop unless you have a lot of music and doc.
Speaking of configuring terminal windows, where are the files to configure those? I've got I think 3 terminals installed (why, I think dependencies), and the default one is xterm, and I havn't seen a place to configure it. There any place I can get the default files, and where would one copy those to to make the configurations?
P.S. 10G IS a big desktop, but I'm still learning, and 10G seemed like plenty of space for /. I also have 10G for /home, and then the rest of my HDD (I have Windows on it at about 32G out of 80G), I have to build my own Linux Distro since I havn't found one I really like.
Distribution: Slackware & Slamd64. What else is there?
Posts: 1,705
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dralnu
Speaking of configuring terminal windows, where are the files to configure those? I've got I think 3 terminals installed (why, I think dependencies), and the default one is xterm, and I havn't seen a place to configure it. There any place I can get the default files, and where would one copy those to to make the configurations?
Read the man pages for each terminal, because the command line you use to invoke it is how they're customized. rxvt and especially aterm have tons of options including background color, text color, title bar color, title bar text, scroll bar placement, transparency (aterm), reverse video, etc., etc., etc.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dralnu
P.S. 10G IS a big desktop, but I'm still learning, and 10G seemed like plenty of space for /. I also have 10G for /home, and then the rest of my HDD (I have Windows on it at about 32G out of 80G), I have to build my own Linux Distro since I havn't found one I really like.
Sounds like you should have more distros installed and less space allocated for each one
Read the man pages for each terminal, because the command line you use to invoke it is how they're customized. rxvt and especially aterm have tons of options including background color, text color, title bar color, title bar text, scroll bar placement, transparency (aterm), reverse video, etc., etc., etc.
Sounds like you should have more distros installed and less space allocated for each one
I would, but I'm trying to build my own, plus I'd rather just try and follow the KISS principle.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.