LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Password
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 02-07-2006, 04:18 PM   #1
farhan00
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Posts: 3

Rep: Reputation: 0
I screwed up linux really bad


Hey,

I definately screwed up my libraries, but I am not sure how. I get this error:

/bin/sh: relocation error: /usr/local/lib/libdl.so.2 symbol _rtld_global_ro, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file ld-linux.so.2 with link time reference

when I try to even login. I cannot even get to a root prompt. What does this error mean? How do I fix it?

- Farhan
 
Old 02-07-2006, 06:10 PM   #2
rickh
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Albuquerque, NM USA
Distribution: Debian-Lenny/Sid 32/64 Desktop: Generic AMD64-EVGA 680i Laptop: Generic Intel SIS-AC97
Posts: 4,250

Rep: Reputation: 62
It means 'format and re-install!'
 
Old 02-07-2006, 06:26 PM   #3
KimVette
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Lee, NH
Distribution: OpenSUSE, CentOS, RHEL
Posts: 1,794

Rep: Reputation: 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickh
It means 'format and re-install!'
Oh good grief; is this a Windows support forum filled with paper MCSEs, or is this a Linux support forum?

farhan00>
Boot from your distribution CD, and reinstall the kernel and other main parts of the base system. You do NOT have to reformat. Basically, you've lost glibc which isn't all THAT big of a deal. You do not have to reformat. You do not have to reformat. You do not have to reformat. You do not have to reformat. You do not have to reformat.

rickh is the weakest link. Heh!
 
Old 02-07-2006, 06:36 PM   #4
rickh
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Albuquerque, NM USA
Distribution: Debian-Lenny/Sid 32/64 Desktop: Generic AMD64-EVGA 680i Laptop: Generic Intel SIS-AC97
Posts: 4,250

Rep: Reputation: 62
lol. Sorry. I made a rash assumption that farhan00 was a very raw newbie who had deleted a bunch of library files and/or directories either in a panic or inadvertantly.

It's good to introduce new Linux users to the fact that they'll most likely need to reinstall a few times before they're satisfied with their system.
 
Old 02-07-2006, 06:47 PM   #5
Matir
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: San Jose, CA
Distribution: Debian, Arch
Posts: 8,507

Rep: Reputation: 128Reputation: 128
Exclamation

Quote:
Originally Posted by rickh
lol. Sorry. I made a rash assumption that farhan00 was a very raw newbie who had deleted a bunch of library files and/or directories either in a panic or inadvertantly.

It's good to introduce new Linux users to the fact that they'll most likely need to reinstall a few times before they're satisfied with their system.

I honestly can't remember ever having reinstalled due to being 'unsatisfied' with my system. (At least, not without changing distros) I guess it's different for everyone, but I wouldn't always say reinstalling is a given. That's what package management is for.
 
Old 02-07-2006, 10:14 PM   #6
DeusExLinux
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Tampa, Fl
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 648

Rep: Reputation: 30
I used to reinstall, when I first started. But then I realized the ease (and less of a headache) to just install what I needed. Also, when I realized it would take less time to do that than to completely reinstall and resetup.
 
Old 02-08-2006, 12:22 AM   #7
rickh
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Albuquerque, NM USA
Distribution: Debian-Lenny/Sid 32/64 Desktop: Generic AMD64-EVGA 680i Laptop: Generic Intel SIS-AC97
Posts: 4,250

Rep: Reputation: 62
If you're coming from a Windows environment, it seems like a natural thing to do when things get bollixed up ... It's a regular step in Windows trouble-shooting. ... And, I still maintain, it's a good thing for newbies to do. They're dealing with a foreign environment where nothing seems to work, and the repetition provides a good conceptual framework.

That said, I will henceforth refrain from wiseacre comments related to issues I don't understand.
 
Old 02-08-2006, 07:00 AM   #8
seelenbild28
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Germany, Berlin
Distribution: SuSE Linux 9.1/9.2/9.3/10.0/10.1, openSuSE 10.2, 10.3, Slackware, Debian, Redhat, BSD
Posts: 315

Rep: Reputation: 30
reinstall?

it is a really, really bad advice to format and to reinstall the whole system only due to a few libraries or the kernel to be fixed. in my opinion it also doesn't help a newbie to reinstall his system twice or more times, there is obviously no learning effect. it's only time consuming and the newbie will be frustrated, especially in this specific case, where the error was perhaps not caused by the operator. but this case tells us something more: please give no advice if you are not sure, what you are doing or you have no idea about the subject. and even more: if you are not sure, try to find out more about the problem before giving a stupid advice like this....
 
Old 02-08-2006, 10:34 AM   #9
Alien_Hominid
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Lithuania
Distribution: Hybrid
Posts: 2,247

Rep: Reputation: 53
Quote:
Originally Posted by seelenbild28
please give no advice if you are not sure, what you are doing or you have no idea about the subject. and even more: if you are not sure, try to find out more about the problem before giving a stupid advice like this....
Hey, seelenbild28, don't make a flame war. The advice wasn't so stupid. There are some cases when you need to reinstall (for example, system wide configuration is messed up and you don't have a clue how to fix it). The advantage of reinstalling is that each time you can choose different packages (minimise the amount of them) and chose different options. Then look at the system performance and suitability for you. This way you will know which packages is needed for you and which only consuming hard drive space. When I first time installed slackware, I made reinstalling five times just to know how all installation process is proceeding and what thing each of the option does.
 
Old 02-08-2006, 12:12 PM   #10
krisbee
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Posts: 60

Rep: Reputation: 15
I screwed up my xserver really bad once... I had multiple windows open in Mandrake,and I thought I was installing an x component, but in fact, I deleted my entire xserver! I put the install disks in, when to upgrade, and in 30 minutes I was back to normal. Never did I have that kind of luck with Windows.

--Kris
 
Old 02-08-2006, 12:39 PM   #11
jlinkels
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Bonaire, Leeuwarden
Distribution: Debian /Jessie/Stretch/Sid, Linux Mint DE
Posts: 5,196

Rep: Reputation: 1044Reputation: 1044Reputation: 1044Reputation: 1044Reputation: 1044Reputation: 1044Reputation: 1044Reputation: 1044
Well... I don't think it is such a bad idea for newbies.

When I installed Debian for the first time I started over 5 times before I had a running system I was satisfied with.

Only AFTER that I learned how to use apt, install a new kernel, install a new boot loader etc., but I needed a correct working system for that. And after that I never formatted and re-installed, instead, I have made numerous clones of systems which I adapted according to my needs.

(Ok, once I screwed up my system really bad and lost apt and got lost in dependency hell, so I re-installed)

So... re-installing is hardly ever needed, but if a newbie wants to get a working system, it might be a good idea. If someone keeps re-installing every 6 months.... yes, he is either an MSCE or a newbie.

jlinkels
 
Old 02-08-2006, 01:14 PM   #12
seelenbild28
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Germany, Berlin
Distribution: SuSE Linux 9.1/9.2/9.3/10.0/10.1, openSuSE 10.2, 10.3, Slackware, Debian, Redhat, BSD
Posts: 315

Rep: Reputation: 30
oh

guys, think, before you post! it is a really big difference installing debian or suse or ubuntu of something else. suse is especially designed for users coming from windows, real newbies. debian is something really different. there you have to manually (mostly) set up everything on your own. suse instead does the job for you. it is really a big difference. did some of you ever install suse or do you only post from your debian background? I guess that's the case otherwise you wouldn't tell such things. the suse installation process does not help you anything learning about linux.
 
Old 02-08-2006, 03:23 PM   #13
PMorph
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 213

Rep: Reputation: 31
Does this mean you will personally see it that farhan's problem gets fixed?
So far "reinstall" has been the most productive advice posted here.
 
Old 02-08-2006, 03:39 PM   #14
Tinkster
Moderator
 
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: earth
Distribution: slackware by choice, others too :} ... android.
Posts: 23,067
Blog Entries: 11

Rep: Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928
Quote:
Originally Posted by PMorph
Does this mean you will personally see it that farhan's problem gets fixed?
So far "reinstall" has been the most productive advice posted here.
No, it hasn't. Kim's suggestion with the boot CD and re-install of
core-components was spot-on.


Cheers,
Tink
 
Old 02-08-2006, 07:22 PM   #15
KimVette
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Lee, NH
Distribution: OpenSUSE, CentOS, RHEL
Posts: 1,794

Rep: Reputation: 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickh
If you're coming from a Windows environment, it seems like a natural thing to do when things get bollixed up ... It's a regular step in Windows trouble-shooting.
Only if you're a paper MCSE who is totally incompetent. For everyone else, Windows reinstalls are reserved for corrupt filesystems, corrupt registries, rooted systems, bugs for which Microsoft insists in KB articles the ONLY solution is reformat/reinstall (I ran into this with an Exchange bug, I REFUSED to reformat/reinstall, instead I kept digging until I identified and fixed the problem), and major upgrades for which old chipset drivers are so poorly engineered that it's near impossible to uninstall them (e.g., some of VIA's older drivers). Also, Windows upgrades tend to not go smoothly due to system drivers, so I'd suggest CLEANLY installing new operating system versions rather than upgrades, unless ALL old drivers can be cleanly uninstalled first. Oh, and if a client is a cheapskate who doesn't want to pay for more than an hour's work.

The above list might look very long, but it really isn't; practically all other problems are easily resolved without a reformat/reinstall. One might recommend a reformat/reinstall as an option to a client to keep within budget, but not for any technical reason.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I screwed up Linux bad farhan00 Linux - General 1 02-07-2006 04:34 PM
My Linux Is All Screwed Up Help! DozenEggs Linux - Newbie 1 07-20-2004 03:02 PM
I think I screwed my installation up BAD (can't boot) Avatar Linux - General 6 06-10-2004 01:35 PM
Bad burn process->bad Linux media? piggysmile Linux - Newbie 7 05-04-2004 09:08 PM
I screwed Linux! Nervo Linux - General 4 08-27-2003 01:52 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:06 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration