Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
|
02-07-2006, 04:18 PM
|
#1
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Feb 2006
Posts: 3
Rep:
|
I screwed up linux really bad
Hey,
I definately screwed up my libraries, but I am not sure how. I get this error:
/bin/sh: relocation error: /usr/local/lib/libdl.so.2 symbol _rtld_global_ro, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file ld-linux.so.2 with link time reference
when I try to even login. I cannot even get to a root prompt. What does this error mean? How do I fix it?
- Farhan
|
|
|
02-07-2006, 06:10 PM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2004
Location: Albuquerque, NM USA
Distribution: Debian-Lenny/Sid 32/64 Desktop: Generic AMD64-EVGA 680i Laptop: Generic Intel SIS-AC97
Posts: 4,250
Rep:
|
It means 'format and re-install!'
|
|
|
02-07-2006, 06:26 PM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Lee, NH
Distribution: OpenSUSE, CentOS, RHEL
Posts: 1,794
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickh
It means 'format and re-install!'
|
Oh good grief; is this a Windows support forum filled with paper MCSEs, or is this a Linux support forum?
farhan00>
Boot from your distribution CD, and reinstall the kernel and other main parts of the base system. You do NOT have to reformat. Basically, you've lost glibc which isn't all THAT big of a deal. You do not have to reformat. You do not have to reformat. You do not have to reformat. You do not have to reformat. You do not have to reformat.
rickh is the weakest link. Heh!
|
|
|
02-07-2006, 06:36 PM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2004
Location: Albuquerque, NM USA
Distribution: Debian-Lenny/Sid 32/64 Desktop: Generic AMD64-EVGA 680i Laptop: Generic Intel SIS-AC97
Posts: 4,250
Rep:
|
lol. Sorry. I made a rash assumption that farhan00 was a very raw newbie who had deleted a bunch of library files and/or directories either in a panic or inadvertantly.
It's good to introduce new Linux users to the fact that they'll most likely need to reinstall a few times before they're satisfied with their system.
|
|
|
02-07-2006, 06:47 PM
|
#5
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: San Jose, CA
Distribution: Debian, Arch
Posts: 8,507
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickh
lol. Sorry. I made a rash assumption that farhan00 was a very raw newbie who had deleted a bunch of library files and/or directories either in a panic or inadvertantly.
It's good to introduce new Linux users to the fact that they'll most likely need to reinstall a few times before they're satisfied with their system.
|
I honestly can't remember ever having reinstalled due to being 'unsatisfied' with my system. (At least, not without changing distros) I guess it's different for everyone, but I wouldn't always say reinstalling is a given. That's what package management is for.
|
|
|
02-07-2006, 10:14 PM
|
#6
|
Member
Registered: May 2004
Location: Tampa, Fl
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 648
Rep:
|
I used to reinstall, when I first started. But then I realized the ease (and less of a headache) to just install what I needed. Also, when I realized it would take less time to do that than to completely reinstall and resetup.
|
|
|
02-08-2006, 12:22 AM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2004
Location: Albuquerque, NM USA
Distribution: Debian-Lenny/Sid 32/64 Desktop: Generic AMD64-EVGA 680i Laptop: Generic Intel SIS-AC97
Posts: 4,250
Rep:
|
If you're coming from a Windows environment, it seems like a natural thing to do when things get bollixed up ... It's a regular step in Windows trouble-shooting. ... And, I still maintain, it's a good thing for newbies to do. They're dealing with a foreign environment where nothing seems to work, and the repetition provides a good conceptual framework.
That said, I will henceforth refrain from wiseacre comments related to issues I don't understand.
|
|
|
02-08-2006, 07:00 AM
|
#8
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Germany, Berlin
Distribution: SuSE Linux 9.1/9.2/9.3/10.0/10.1, openSuSE 10.2, 10.3, Slackware, Debian, Redhat, BSD
Posts: 315
Rep:
|
reinstall?
it is a really, really bad advice to format and to reinstall the whole system only due to a few libraries or the kernel to be fixed. in my opinion it also doesn't help a newbie to reinstall his system twice or more times, there is obviously no learning effect. it's only time consuming and the newbie will be frustrated, especially in this specific case, where the error was perhaps not caused by the operator. but this case tells us something more: please give no advice if you are not sure, what you are doing or you have no idea about the subject. and even more: if you are not sure, try to find out more about the problem before giving a stupid advice like this....
|
|
|
02-08-2006, 10:34 AM
|
#9
|
Senior Member
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Lithuania
Distribution: Hybrid
Posts: 2,247
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by seelenbild28
please give no advice if you are not sure, what you are doing or you have no idea about the subject. and even more: if you are not sure, try to find out more about the problem before giving a stupid advice like this....
|
Hey, seelenbild28, don't make a flame war. The advice wasn't so stupid. There are some cases when you need to reinstall (for example, system wide configuration is messed up and you don't have a clue how to fix it). The advantage of reinstalling is that each time you can choose different packages (minimise the amount of them) and chose different options. Then look at the system performance and suitability for you. This way you will know which packages is needed for you and which only consuming hard drive space. When I first time installed slackware, I made reinstalling five times just to know how all installation process is proceeding and what thing each of the option does.
|
|
|
02-08-2006, 12:12 PM
|
#10
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2006
Posts: 60
Rep:
|
I screwed up my xserver really bad once... I had multiple windows open in Mandrake,and I thought I was installing an x component, but in fact, I deleted my entire xserver! I put the install disks in, when to upgrade, and in 30 minutes I was back to normal. Never did I have that kind of luck with Windows.
--Kris
|
|
|
02-08-2006, 12:39 PM
|
#11
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Bonaire, Leeuwarden
Distribution: Debian /Jessie/Stretch/Sid, Linux Mint DE
Posts: 5,196
|
Well... I don't think it is such a bad idea for newbies.
When I installed Debian for the first time I started over 5 times before I had a running system I was satisfied with.
Only AFTER that I learned how to use apt, install a new kernel, install a new boot loader etc., but I needed a correct working system for that. And after that I never formatted and re-installed, instead, I have made numerous clones of systems which I adapted according to my needs.
(Ok, once I screwed up my system really bad and lost apt and got lost in dependency hell, so I re-installed)
So... re-installing is hardly ever needed, but if a newbie wants to get a working system, it might be a good idea. If someone keeps re-installing every 6 months.... yes, he is either an MSCE or a newbie.
jlinkels
|
|
|
02-08-2006, 01:14 PM
|
#12
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Germany, Berlin
Distribution: SuSE Linux 9.1/9.2/9.3/10.0/10.1, openSuSE 10.2, 10.3, Slackware, Debian, Redhat, BSD
Posts: 315
Rep:
|
oh
guys, think, before you post! it is a really big difference installing debian or suse or ubuntu of something else. suse is especially designed for users coming from windows, real newbies. debian is something really different. there you have to manually (mostly) set up everything on your own. suse instead does the job for you. it is really a big difference. did some of you ever install suse or do you only post from your debian background? I guess that's the case otherwise you wouldn't tell such things. the suse installation process does not help you anything learning about linux.
|
|
|
02-08-2006, 03:23 PM
|
#13
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2003
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 213
Rep:
|
Does this mean you will personally see it that farhan's problem gets fixed?
So far "reinstall" has been the most productive advice posted here.
|
|
|
02-08-2006, 03:39 PM
|
#14
|
Moderator
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: earth
Distribution: slackware by choice, others too :} ... android.
Posts: 23,067
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PMorph
Does this mean you will personally see it that farhan's problem gets fixed?
So far "reinstall" has been the most productive advice posted here.
|
No, it hasn't. Kim's suggestion with the boot CD and re-install of
core-components was spot-on.
Cheers,
Tink
|
|
|
02-08-2006, 07:22 PM
|
#15
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Lee, NH
Distribution: OpenSUSE, CentOS, RHEL
Posts: 1,794
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickh
If you're coming from a Windows environment, it seems like a natural thing to do when things get bollixed up ... It's a regular step in Windows trouble-shooting.
|
Only if you're a paper MCSE who is totally incompetent. For everyone else, Windows reinstalls are reserved for corrupt filesystems, corrupt registries, rooted systems, bugs for which Microsoft insists in KB articles the ONLY solution is reformat/reinstall (I ran into this with an Exchange bug, I REFUSED to reformat/reinstall, instead I kept digging until I identified and fixed the problem), and major upgrades for which old chipset drivers are so poorly engineered that it's near impossible to uninstall them (e.g., some of VIA's older drivers). Also, Windows upgrades tend to not go smoothly due to system drivers, so I'd suggest CLEANLY installing new operating system versions rather than upgrades, unless ALL old drivers can be cleanly uninstalled first. Oh, and if a client is a cheapskate who doesn't want to pay for more than an hour's work.
The above list might look very long, but it really isn't; practically all other problems are easily resolved without a reformat/reinstall. One might recommend a reformat/reinstall as an option to a client to keep within budget, but not for any technical reason.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:06 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|