LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Password
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.

Notices


Closed Thread
  Search this Thread
Old 03-16-2017, 09:49 PM   #31
ardvark71
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Feb 2015
Location: USA
Distribution: Lubuntu 14.04, 22.04, Windows 8.1 and 10
Posts: 6,282

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842

Quote:
Originally Posted by X-LFS-2010 View Post
it's probably rejecting you by having detected your a file shark.
Hi...

Thank you for your reply. I'm not sure what you mean by "file shark."

Quote:
Originally Posted by X-LFS-2010 View Post
if that don't work use a "real OS" that compiles firefox from scratch without allot of headaches or build failures. it should be working then.

if not: then perhaps your authentication libraries are used by firefox and have become changed (ie, openssl). unfortunately, there are so many auth mechs these days (not just openssl: tens or hundreds of knotted auth libs PLUS kernel auth support PLUS hardware auth support)
But why does my copy of Firefox work correctly but Chrome and Chromium does not.

Quote:
Originally Posted by X-LFS-2010 View Post
back up from this problem: don't get so close it swallows you. try the version of firefox (chrome flavor) that last worked first.
Nah, it's not worth that.

My copy of Chrome and Firefox are "original," meaning there were no previous versions.

Regards...
 
Old 03-17-2017, 08:08 AM   #32
TB0ne
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Distribution: SuSE, RedHat, Slack,CentOS
Posts: 26,635

Rep: Reputation: 7965Reputation: 7965Reputation: 7965Reputation: 7965Reputation: 7965Reputation: 7965Reputation: 7965Reputation: 7965Reputation: 7965Reputation: 7965Reputation: 7965
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardvark71 View Post
But why does my copy of Firefox work correctly but Chrome and Chromium does not.
Sorry, but what are you confused about still??? Posts #2, #7, #11, #22, #23, and #28 all explain why you're having issues. What, exactly, are you confused about? What is not/has not been clear in any or all of these explanations???

Upgrade your OS, period. That's it. You're getting this problem because of the age of the cryptographic libraries, and the age of the browser. Can't update browser unless you compile from source, and even then you will STILL HAVE THE PROBLEM because your crypto libraries will STILL BE OLD.

Last edited by TB0ne; 03-17-2017 at 08:23 AM.
 
Old 03-17-2017, 09:00 PM   #33
ardvark71
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Feb 2015
Location: USA
Distribution: Lubuntu 14.04, 22.04, Windows 8.1 and 10
Posts: 6,282

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842
Quote:
Originally Posted by TB0ne View Post
Sorry, but what are you confused about still??? Posts #2, #7, #11, #22, #23, and #28 all explain why you're having issues. What, exactly, are you confused about? What is not/has not been clear in any or all of these explanations???
Hi...

In part because my copy of Chrome version 49 works fine on Windows Vista, an even older OS.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TB0ne View Post
Upgrade your OS, period. That's it. You're getting this problem because of the age of the cryptographic libraries, and the age of the browser. Can't update browser unless you compile from source, and even then you will STILL HAVE THE PROBLEM because your crypto libraries will STILL BE OLD.
Yes, I understand that I will need to upgrade Lubuntu. Since that seems to be the only known solution, I'll go ahead and mark this thread as "SOLVED."

Thanks...
 
Old 03-18-2017, 09:41 AM   #34
TB0ne
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Distribution: SuSE, RedHat, Slack,CentOS
Posts: 26,635

Rep: Reputation: 7965Reputation: 7965Reputation: 7965Reputation: 7965Reputation: 7965Reputation: 7965Reputation: 7965Reputation: 7965Reputation: 7965Reputation: 7965Reputation: 7965
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardvark71 View Post
Hi...
In part because my copy of Chrome version 49 works fine on Windows Vista, an even older OS.
Because Windows Vista reaches end-of-life in April of 2017. Lubuntu 14.04 reached end of life April 2016. Do you see the difference???? If that's not clear enough:
  • Windows Vista received upgraded crypto libraries
  • Lubuntu 14.04 DID NOT receive upgraded crypto libraries.
Checking end-of-life on software, reading release notes, and doing research are all things you can do for yourself.
Quote:
Yes, I understand that I will need to upgrade Lubuntu. Since that seems to be the only known solution, I'll go ahead and mark this thread as "SOLVED."
If you really did understand that, there wouldn't be three pages on this thread, with the last one still having you 'confused'.
 
Old 03-19-2017, 05:25 PM   #35
ardvark71
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Feb 2015
Location: USA
Distribution: Lubuntu 14.04, 22.04, Windows 8.1 and 10
Posts: 6,282

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842
Quote:
Originally Posted by TB0ne View Post
Lubuntu 14.04 reached end of life April 2016
Hi...

No, support ends at some point this year, according to this page.

Regards...
 
Old 03-19-2017, 07:43 PM   #36
TB0ne
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Distribution: SuSE, RedHat, Slack,CentOS
Posts: 26,635

Rep: Reputation: 7965Reputation: 7965Reputation: 7965Reputation: 7965Reputation: 7965Reputation: 7965Reputation: 7965Reputation: 7965Reputation: 7965Reputation: 7965Reputation: 7965
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardvark71 View Post
Hi...
No, support ends at some point this year, according to this page.
Nice that you mention you're using LTS now. Regardless, changes nothing....You don't have the libraries, and won't. Even if you want to split hairs and be "confused", it's EOL next month.
 
Old 03-20-2017, 12:10 AM   #37
ardvark71
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Feb 2015
Location: USA
Distribution: Lubuntu 14.04, 22.04, Windows 8.1 and 10
Posts: 6,282

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842
Quote:
Originally Posted by TB0ne View Post
Nice that you mention you're using LTS now.
Hi...

You didn't know that 14.04 is LTS? As it stands, unless someone knows exactly how to fix this issue, the solution is to upgrade.

Regards...

Last edited by ardvark71; 03-20-2017 at 12:12 AM. Reason: Changed wording.
 
Old 03-20-2017, 07:14 AM   #38
TB0ne
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Distribution: SuSE, RedHat, Slack,CentOS
Posts: 26,635

Rep: Reputation: 7965Reputation: 7965Reputation: 7965Reputation: 7965Reputation: 7965Reputation: 7965Reputation: 7965Reputation: 7965Reputation: 7965Reputation: 7965Reputation: 7965
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardvark71 View Post
Hi...
You didn't know that 14.04 is LTS?
Nope, because Lubuntu 14.04 was the ONLY LTS version until 16.04. All other versions didn't even have the option, and you sure didn't mention it.
Quote:
As it stands, unless someone knows exactly how to fix this issue, the solution is to upgrade.
You were told NUMEROUS times how to fix it, but you either didn't read or understand the fixes. Post #2 tells you how to get this 'patched' at the very least, and post #7 follows it up. You even posted that the command-line configuration was an option (post #3), but either didn't run it, or ignored it.

The real solution is, as explained to you numerous times, is to upgrade. Nothing to be confused about, and don't know how many more times folks need to tell you this, especially since you ran your own test with a newer version of Linux and thing worked fine, proving the theory.
 
Old 05-09-2017, 08:50 PM   #39
txslnx
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2017
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardvark71 View Post
Hi...

You didn't know that 14.04 is LTS? As it stands, unless someone knows exactly how to fix this issue, the solution is to upgrade.

Regards...

I had this happen to me in 16.02 and 17.04. Both times it was a certificate problem with Chromium. Removing it and installing Chrome "fixed" it.
 
Old 05-10-2017, 12:08 AM   #40
ardvark71
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Feb 2015
Location: USA
Distribution: Lubuntu 14.04, 22.04, Windows 8.1 and 10
Posts: 6,282

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842
Quote:
Originally Posted by txslnx View Post
I had this happen to me in 16.02 and 17.04. Both times it was a certificate problem with Chromium. Removing it and installing Chrome "fixed" it.
Hello and welcome to the forum

Thank you for registering to share this with me. In my case, the problem is with both Chrome and Chromium, although installing a slightly newer version of Chrome might be worth trying.

Regards...

Last edited by ardvark71; 05-10-2017 at 12:11 AM. Reason: Changed wording.
 
Old 05-17-2017, 06:55 AM   #41
ardvark71
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Feb 2015
Location: USA
Distribution: Lubuntu 14.04, 22.04, Windows 8.1 and 10
Posts: 6,282

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842Reputation: 842
Hi all...

Ohhh, yeahhhh!! I finally got this problem entirely fixed without having to upgrade the OS! From what I found here, one command took care of it all...

Code:
sudo apt-get install libnss3-1d
Now both Chrome and Chromium work as they should! I probably would have never come across this had I not upgraded Chromium to version 58 and suddenly come across the error practically everywhere I tried to go.

Regards...

Last edited by ardvark71; 05-17-2017 at 06:58 AM. Reason: Added comment.
 
Old 05-17-2017, 12:42 PM   #42
Ztcoracat
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Dec 2011
Distribution: Slackware, MX 18
Posts: 9,484
Blog Entries: 15

Rep: Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardvark71 View Post
Hi all...

Ohhh, yeahhhh!! I finally got this problem entirely fixed without having to upgrade the OS! From what I found here, one command took care of it all...

Code:
sudo apt-get install libnss3-1d
Now both Chrome and Chromium work as they should! I probably would have never come across this had I not upgraded Chromium to version 58 and suddenly come across the error practically everywhere I tried to go.

Regards...
That's great news. Congrads!
 
Old 05-17-2017, 01:16 PM   #43
TB0ne
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Distribution: SuSE, RedHat, Slack,CentOS
Posts: 26,635

Rep: Reputation: 7965Reputation: 7965Reputation: 7965Reputation: 7965Reputation: 7965Reputation: 7965Reputation: 7965Reputation: 7965Reputation: 7965Reputation: 7965Reputation: 7965
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ztcoracat View Post
That's great news. Congrads!
I wouldn't call spending three months on solving a problem with old, outdated software something to be congratulated about. Especially since doing a fresh install would've taken about 30 minutes.

And he's still left with an outdated system that's EOL. Pointless.
 
Old 05-17-2017, 01:18 PM   #44
rtmistler
Moderator
 
Registered: Mar 2011
Location: USA
Distribution: MINT Debian, Angstrom, SUSE, Ubuntu, Debian
Posts: 9,882
Blog Entries: 13

Rep: Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930
error post - apologies
 
Old 05-17-2017, 01:23 PM   #45
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,602

Rep: Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084
@TB0ne, that post is in no way constructive and adds nothing to the conversation that you haven't already said. I've asked you multiple times to refrain from this kind of behavior.

-jeremy
 
3 members found this post helpful.
  


Closed Thread



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Switching to Chromium re the Chrome 32 bit fiasco, Chromium freezes all the time Clived Linux Mint 3 01-29-2016 04:37 PM
[SOLVED] Chromium vs Chrome herakles_14 Ubuntu 7 09-27-2012 10:29 PM
Chrome vs Chromium linuxlover2 Linux - Software 3 11-05-2011 03:02 PM
LXer: Google Chrome/Chromium crashy Flash problems (and a solution for Chromium in Linux) LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 03-06-2011 03:40 AM
Proxy setting in Chromium/Chrome suddenly stop working DreamDreams Linux - Software 0 06-09-2010 07:36 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:51 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration