Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Yes, but again, you seem to be ignoring/not understand the replies. Yes, you CAN install all that from source, but AGAIN, you will have to install all the DEPENDENCIES from source too. Go right ahead and do so if you want...doesn't get much more clear than that.
And AGAIN, if you're not going to PAY for Red Hat enterprise, then DON'T USE IT. If you took this advice (which you were given quite some time ago), you wouldn't be having these problems now. And again, even if you manage to get things going, you'll be unpatched, have no updates, and have security/bug issues to deal with.
Except install dependencies , is there any other way round ?
The reason that I am not prefer to install dependencies is because this is a critical server , I have an experience that the server was crashed after installed dependencies , so that I find that way which do not need to install dependencies .
Double check which cifs-utils package you are trying to install. Having libc as a dependency indicates you are trying to install the wrong version. Some of the dependencies may disappear if you select the correct option.
You may also need to install the cifs kernel modules. Redhat leaves out many kernel modules from there kernel to keep it lean.
Except install dependencies , is there any other way round ?
The reason that I am not prefer to install dependencies is because this is a critical server , I have an experience that the server was crashed after installed dependencies , so that I find that way which do not need to install dependencies .
You continue to ignore the advice given. Again, either PAY FOR RED HAT ENTERPRISE OR USE SOMETHING ELSE. If you were using CentOS, you would be having NONE of these issues. If you were PAYING for RHEL, you would be having none of these issues. If it is a 'critical server', then it should be supported, since it's critical.
If you want the software to work, you install dependencies, period. If you continue to install things from various sources, you WILL wind up with an unstable server, as you have in the past. What do you expect to happen when you run unsupported, and install things that aren't certified to work with particular versions of your server??
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.