It should be mentioned that EPEL does have security info of its own, and Scientific Linux relates the RHEL security updates to SL. This info is contained within the repo in a file called updateinfo.xml.gz.
(if you didnt read the post above, please note that Centos does not have its own security updates, nor does it use RedHats)
Examples of EPEL and SL:
Code:
# cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS release 5.8 (Final)
# yum info-security varnish
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities, security
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* base: centos.sonn.com
===============================================================================
varnish-2.0.6-4.el5
===============================================================================
Update ID : FEDORA-EPEL-2013-12157
Release : Fedora EPEL 5
Type : security
Status : stable
Issued : 2013-11-20 15:54:20
Bugs : 1025129 - CVE-2013-4484 varnish: denial of service handling certain GET requests [epel-all]
Description : Backported a patch for CVE-2013-4484
info-security done
and scientific linux
Code:
# cat /etc/redhat-release
Scientific Linux release 6.5 (Carbon)
# yum info-security kernel
Loaded plugins: security
===============================================================================
Important: kernel security update
===============================================================================
Update ID : SLSA-2014:0159-1
Release : Scientific Linux
Type : security
Status : final
Issued : 2014-02-12 00:00:00
Bugs : 1028148 - kernel: exec/ptrace: get_dumpable() incorrect tests
: 1033600 - Kernel: qeth: buffer overflow in snmp ioctl
: 1035875 - Kernel: net: leakage of uninitialized memory to user-space via recv syscalls
This is one reason why i am required to use SL6 instead of Centos.