Quote:
Originally Posted by Synt4x_3rr0r
Because I dont like to have the sourcecode folders laying around and it's much easier to unistall the software if something should happen to it.
|
I'm not sure I follow you on this. I downloaded gtk+-2.8.17 to my home directory, uncompressed it and installed it in /opt/gnome. Then I deleted the gtk+-2.8.17* files and I've got GTK+ up and running and no source laying around.
Where's the problem?
Quote:
Some applications sourcecode dont even have an option to uninstall it. It actually surprices me a little that you are a slackware user and doesn't use checkinstall.
But I guess everyone have their way of doing things.
|
You shouldn't have to UN-install a library if the apps that use it are running fine, so I'm not sure why you would bother with a full "package". Linux distros make packages so people can install parts of the app or library instead of the whole thing. For example, Apache can be installed with the files needed to just run it and without the files needed for other apps to be built against it. If you're building GTK+ and other stuff from source, you're gonna get EVERYTHING unless you turn stuff off when you configure it.
I've been able to migrate from a glib/gtk+ 1.2.5 system to a glibc-2.8.6/gtk+-2.8.17 system without any problems at all, outside of leftover libraries from previous installations (which aren't source files).
I honestly find it odd that an end user would create packages from source built apps for their own installation, considering they aren't distro maintainers. But, to each his own.
Peace...