Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
so can someone explain to me WHY this can't be done? i mean, i see no reason that you couldn't have like an internal bootloader to boot a separate OS, i mean, there's linload for DOS which does exactly what i want and there's no winload or whatever? how backward is that?
you can even get bootloaders for running from inside psp firmware and Pocket PC's, i mean, come on, where's the difference, why can't you just have an application that calls 000000:07C000 of your MBR and just dump your RAM? i don't see why this is so hard!
Last edited by Person_1873; 02-08-2008 at 06:09 AM.
If you don't see why it's so hard, then please implement it. Especially the parts where you go through and reset the state of every piece of hardware on the system. And don't forget the need to switch back into real mode, which is sortof interesting in the sense that you'll need the currently running kernel to do it. I'm not sure what the problem with rebooting is -- it's designed to do hardware initialization, after all.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.