Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
i am trying to get giFToxic 0.0.9, it requires gtk+-2.0 or higher. i just installed GNOME 2.2.2 so i know i should have gtk+-2.0. here is there error that i get when i try to configure giFToxic.
checking for gtk+-2.0 >= 2.0.3 libgift >= 0.10.0... Package gtk+-2.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path.
Perhaps you should add the directory containing `gtk+-2.0.pc'
to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
No package 'gtk+-2.0' found
configure: error: Library requirements (gtk+-2.0 >= 2.0.3 libgift >= 0.10.0) not met; consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if your libraries are in a nonstandard prefix so pkg-config can find them.
where can i get the gtk2-devel package? i tried the gtk website, but i didn't find it. and you assumed correctly with this being on redhat.
edit: ok, i rechecked the gtk website and i found it, but it was 2.0.1,.. when i tried to install it i got an error saying that i needed 2.1.0. i couldn't find that one.
meta_image.c:27:24: magick/api.h: No such file or directory
meta_image.c:33: parse error before "ExceptionInfo"
meta_image.c: In function `set_image_info':
meta_image.c:35: `Image' undeclared (first use in this function)
meta_image.c:35: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
meta_image.c:35: for each function it appears in.)
meta_image.c:35: `img' undeclared (first use in this function)
meta_image.c:36: `ImageInfo' undeclared (first use in this function)
meta_image.c:36: `info' undeclared (first use in this function)
meta_image.c:39: warning: implicit declaration of function `CloneImageInfo'
meta_image.c:42: `path' undeclared (first use in this function)
meta_image.c:45: warning: implicit declaration of function `ReadImage'
meta_image.c:45: `excp' undeclared (first use in this function)
meta_image.c:49: warning: implicit declaration of function `DestroyImageInfo'
meta_image.c:53: `file' undeclared (first use in this function)
meta_image.c:56: warning: implicit declaration of function `DestroyImage'
meta_image.c: In function `meta_image_run':
meta_image.c:66: `ExceptionInfo' undeclared (first use in this function)
meta_image.c:66: parse error before "excp"
meta_image.c:69: warning: implicit declaration of function `InitializeMagick'
meta_image.c:70: warning: implicit declaration of function `GetExceptionInfo'
meta_image.c:70: `excp' undeclared (first use in this function)
meta_image.c:76: warning: implicit declaration of function `DestroyExceptionInfo'
meta_image.c:77: warning: implicit declaration of function `DestroyMagick'
make[3]: *** [meta_image.lo] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/zero/gift-0.11.2/src/meta'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/zero/gift-0.11.2/src'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/zero/gift-0.11.2'
make: *** [all] Error 2
sorry for the double post,.. i really need help with this though,.. i switched to Slackware 9, and it still does it,... so please,.. anyone that has some kind of knowledge with this
ok, here was the thing to get it compiled right., you need to get ImageMagick,... you can find this at sourceforge.net. when i got it compiled, i started having a new problem. it says i need openFT, so i got OpenFT,.. i try to install it and it says it can't find libgift.pc,...
i could have sworn i installed imagemagik, which is what confused me. i'll try to install/reinstall it and see what happens on my machine. maybe between the two of us we can figure this out. sounds like a ton of library dependency issues.
> edit: yep, installing or reinstalling imagemagick seems to have worked for me, which is strange, i thought for sure i installed that when i installed slack. anyway, check the installation page for the libraries giFT needs for OpenFT (section 3.1): http://gift.sourceforge.net/docs.php...html#id2847031
you might need to make sure you have all of those -- it says some are mandatory (mandatory, but not dependent, weird ). gl
Last edited by synaptical; 08-01-2003 at 10:52 AM.
my big problem right now is when i try to install OpenFT or giFToxic, i do the ./configure and then it says it can't find libgift.pc,... i found libgift.so and libgift.la but no libgift.pc,... anything i'm doing wrong?
well,... after much time trying to figure this out, i finally found libgift.pc, i got giFT installed, i installed giFTcurs just to see if it worked out,... the installation went fine,.. giFTcurs works out just great,... i found that libgift.pc was in your giFT cvs folder (if you used cvs) so i just did this
export PKG_CONFIG_PATH=~/giFT/lib/
to get to the file,.. that worked great,.. it found it and installed just fine,.. but now i get this error <_<
giFToxic: error while loading shared libraries: libgift.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
so i'm going to try to figure that one out unless someone has something to offer on that subject.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.