LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Password
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 03-24-2015, 05:18 AM   #1
Glenn D.
Member
 
Registered: May 2009
Location: ACT - Australia
Distribution: Opensuse x86_64 (Latest)
Posts: 132

Rep: Reputation: 26
getting bluefish-2.2.7 to build.


Hello,

bluefish-2.2.7 build fails while bluefish-2.2.6 build passes.

All I change is Version: {from 2.2.6 to 2.2.7}

What lines in the bluefish.spec do I change to allow Version 2.2.7 to build ?
Thanks
--Glenn

bluefish.spec:
https://build.opensuse.org/package/v....spec?expand=1

Full build log:
https://build.opensuse.org/build/hom.../bluefish/_log

Build log bluefish-2.2.7 build -fail
###################################

[ 365s] Obsoletes: bluefish-unstable < 2.2.3
[ 365s] Processing files: bluefish-debugsource-2.2.7-18.1.x86_64
[ 365s] Provides: bluefish-debugsource = 2.2.7-18.1 bluefish-debugsource(x86-64) = 2.2.7-18.1
[ 365s] Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
[ 365s] Processing files: bluefish-debuginfo-2.2.7-18.1.x86_64
[ 365s] warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/debug/.build-id
[ 365s] warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/debug/.build-id
[ 365s] warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/debug/.build-id
[ 365s] warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/debug/.build-id
[ 365s] warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/debug/.build-id
[ 365s] warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/debug/.build-id
[ 365s] Provides: bluefish-debuginfo = 2.2.7-18.1 bluefish-debuginfo(x86-64) = 2.2.7-18.1 debuginfo(build-id) = 33d64a2efb6d435d4030e0238a393e4657c82557 debuginfo(build-id) = 589934c4e86cb3abeab34737e72e5878ce319292 debuginfo(build-id) = 5f44b139da0a20a039580ca393ac3f6275dfe8c8 debuginfo(build-id) = b29515060e58a8c9beb50299c0c667185d7bd53c debuginfo(build-id) = d39e22f8d866921b33e4ac0b0060b6f5d43941a1 debuginfo(build-id) = db464483b2642547a9ae49d01e89c733c7fe665a debuginfo(build-id) = e91bbf5aefb9fb6c91aa3c3021f467a5de45a927
[ 365s] Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
[ 365s] Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/bluefish-2.2.7-18.1.x86_64
[ 365s] Wrote: /home/abuild/rpmbuild/SRPMS/bluefish-2.2.7-18.1.src.rpm
[ 377s] Wrote: /home/abuild/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/bluefish-2.2.7-18.1.x86_64.rpm
[ 380s] Wrote: /home/abuild/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/bluefish-debugsource-2.2.7-18.1.x86_64.rpm
[ 383s] Wrote: /home/abuild/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/bluefish-debuginfo-2.2.7-18.1.x86_64.rpm
[ 383s] Executing(%clean): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.kaJlCa
[ 383s] + umask 022
[ 383s] + cd /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD
[ 383s] + cd bluefish-2.2.7
[ 383s] + rm -rf /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/bluefish-2.2.7-18.1.x86_64
[ 383s] + exit 0
[ 383s] ... checking for files with abuild user/group
[ 383s] ... running 00-check-install-rpms
[ 383s] ... installing all built rpms
[ 383s] Preparing packages...
[ 384s] bluefish-2.2.7-18.1.x86_64
[ 385s] bluefish-debugsource-2.2.7-18.1.x86_64
[ 385s] bluefish-debuginfo-2.2.7-18.1.x86_64
[ 386s] ... running 01-check-debuginfo
[ 386s] ... testing for empty debuginfo packages
[ 386s] ... running 02-check-gcc-output
[ 386s] ... testing for serious compiler warnings
[ 386s] (using /usr/lib/build/checks-data/check_gcc_output)
[ 386s] (using //.build.log)
[ 386s]
[ 386s] I: Program is likely to break with new gcc. Try -fno-strict-aliasing.
[ 386s] W: bluefish strict-aliasing-punning zeneditor-interface.c:472
[ 386s] E: bluefish 64bit-portability-issue document.c:2448
[ 386s] ### WATCHDOG MARKER START ###
[ 389s] [ 358.983591] SysRq : Power Off
[ 389s] [ 358.990176] reboot: Power down
[ 391s] ### WATCHDOG MARKER END ###


Build log bluefish-2.2.6 build -pass
###################################

[ 150s] dependency check for bluefish-debugsource-2.2.6-2.3.1.x86_64.rpm:
[ 150s] ... running 06-check-installtest
[ 150s] ... testing for pre/postinstall scripts that are not idempotent
[ 151s] ... running 08-check-permissions
[ 151s] ... testing for modified permissions
[ 152s] ... running 09-check-packaged-twice
[ 152s] ... running 10-check-lanana
[ 152s] ... running 12-check-libtool-deps
[ 152s] ... testing devel dependencies required by libtool .la files
[ 152s] (can be skipped by "skip-check-libtool-deps" anywhere in spec)
[ 152s] ... running 13-check-invalid-provides
[ 152s] ... running 14-check-gconf-scriptlets
[ 152s] ... testing GConf scriptlet presence
[ 152s] ... running 72-translate-appdata
[ 152s] ... running 99-check-remove-rpms
[ 152s] ... removing all built rpms
[ 153s] (order: reverse bluefish bluefish-debuginfo bluefish-debugsource)
[ 153s]
[ 153s] RPMLINT report:
[ 153s] ===============
[ 156s] 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[ 156s]
[ 156s] ... creating baselibs
[ 156s] ... saving statistics
[ 156s] ... saving built packages
[ 156s] RPMS/x86_64/bluefish-2.2.6-2.3.1.x86_64.rpm
[ 156s] RPMS/x86_64/bluefish-debuginfo-2.2.6-2.3.1.x86_64.rpm
[ 156s] RPMS/x86_64/bluefish-debugsource-2.2.6-2.3.1.x86_64.rpm
[ 156s] SRPMS/bluefish-2.2.6-2.3.1.src.rpm
[ 156s] OTHER/rpmlint.log
[ 156s] OTHER/_statistics
[ 156s] OTHER/bluefish-appdata.xml
[ 156s]
[ 156s] cloud105 finished "build bluefish.spec" at Mon Mar 23 09:51:47 UTC 2015.
[ 156s]
[ 156s] ### WATCHDOG MARKER START ###
[ 159s] [ 139.002799] SysRq : Power Off
[ 159s] [ 139.016293] reboot: Power down
[ 163s] ### WATCHDOG MARKER END ###
[ 163s] build: extracting built packages...
[ 164s] RPMS/x86_64/bluefish-2.2.6-2.3.1.x86_64.rpm
[ 164s] RPMS/x86_64/bluefish-debuginfo-2.2.6-2.3.1.x86_64.rpm
[ 164s] RPMS/x86_64/bluefish-debugsource-2.2.6-2.3.1.x86_64.rpm
[ 164s] SRPMS/bluefish-2.2.6-2.3.1.src.rpm
[ 164s] OTHER/rpmlint.log
[ 164s] OTHER/_statistics
[ 164s] OTHER/bluefish-appdata.xml
 
Old 04-12-2015, 05:26 AM   #2
unSpawn
Moderator
 
Registered: May 2001
Posts: 29,415
Blog Entries: 55

Rep: Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600
Are you sure? Because it sure looks like it wrote the source and binary RPM packages OK:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenn D. View Post
Code:
[  283s] RPMLINT report:
[  283s] ===============
[  288s] 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[  288s] 
[  288s] ... creating baselibs
[  288s] ... comparing built packages with the former built
[  288s] /usr/lib/build/rpm-check.sh
[  288s] compare /.build.oldpackages/bluefish-2.2.7-40.1.src.rpm /home/abuild/rpmbuild/SRPMS/bluefish-2.2.7-41.1.src.rpm
[  288s] --- /tmp/tmp.jq1HdCi5AI	2015-03-27 04:07:59.802458099 +0000
[  288s] +++ /tmp/tmp.eE0VRncGVe	2015-03-27 04:07:59.822458099 +0000
[  288s] @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
[  288s]  (supports HTML, PHP, Java, Perl, Python, Ruby, C, Pascal and more).
[  288s]  
[  288s]  It is based on Gtk+.
[  288s] - obs://build.opensuse.org/home:doiggl home:doiggl / openSUSE_13.2 obs://build.opensuse.org/home:doiggl/openSUSE_13.2/eb93a79b636eb805a35cab1357178a38-bluefish GPL-3.0+ GPL-3.0+
[  288s] + obs://build.opensuse.org/home:doiggl home:doiggl / openSUSE_13.2 obs://build.opensuse.org/home:doiggl/openSUSE_13.2/28bba055f7bfd85447f7e4fff95ebf30-bluefish GPL-3.0+ GPL-3.0+
[  288s]   Productivity/Publishing/HTML/Editors http://bluefish.openoffice.nl/ (none) (none) (none)
[  288s]   (none) 4.11.3 (none)
[  288s]   cpio gzip 9
[  288s] RPM meta information is different
[  288s] ... saving statistics
[  288s] ... saving built packages
[  288s] RPMS/x86_64/bluefish-debuginfo-2.2.7-41.1.x86_64.rpm
[  288s] RPMS/x86_64/bluefish-debugsource-2.2.7-41.1.x86_64.rpm
[  288s] RPMS/x86_64/bluefish-2.2.7-41.1.x86_64.rpm
[  288s] SRPMS/bluefish-2.2.7-41.1.src.rpm
[  288s] OTHER/_statistics
[  288s] OTHER/bluefish-appdata.xml
[  288s] OTHER/rpmlint.log
[  289s] 
[  289s] build08 finished "build bluefish.spec" at Fri Mar 27 04:08:00 UTC 2015.
[  289s] 
[  289s] ### WATCHDOG MARKER START ###
[  293s] [  263.819290] SysRq : Power Off
[  293s] [  263.840664] reboot: Power down
[  294s] ### WATCHDOG MARKER END ###
[  294s] build: extracting built packages...
[  295s] RPMS/x86_64/bluefish-debuginfo-2.2.7-41.1.x86_64.rpm
[  295s] RPMS/x86_64/bluefish-debugsource-2.2.7-41.1.x86_64.rpm
[  295s] RPMS/x86_64/bluefish-2.2.7-41.1.x86_64.rpm

//NTLB
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bluefish fluteofliar Linux - Newbie 3 06-26-2010 02:30 PM
Bluefish or Screem? d33pdream Linux - Software 8 02-23-2010 02:21 AM
Bluefish defaults mjjzf Linux - Software 1 05-15-2006 04:50 PM
bluefish: relocation error: bluefish: undefined symbol: gtk_file_chooser_di pymehta Linux - Software 3 02-05-2005 11:00 PM
bluefish jcombs_31 Slackware 5 01-06-2005 08:02 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:27 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration