Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
08-17-2002, 05:09 PM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2002
Distribution: damnsmalllinux
Posts: 205
Rep:
|
gcc installation
hey, i'm trying to install gcc (a version i am certain is the one for my distro and kernel and such), but i get a file dependency issue: libtcl8.3.so is needed, and i can't find it anywhere. i don't even know what it is! well, i understand it's a library of some sort, but is it for C, python, or something else? if so, how can i get it, and where do i put it when i do? and why doesn't gcc (the latest version btw) come with it??
|
|
|
08-17-2002, 05:28 PM
|
#2
|
Moderator
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,417
|
it's tcl.
|
|
|
08-17-2002, 11:21 PM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2002
Distribution: damnsmalllinux
Posts: 205
Original Poster
Rep:
|
might i ask what tcl is??
|
|
|
08-17-2002, 11:29 PM
|
#4
|
LQ Addict
Registered: Dec 2001
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Distribution: *NIX
Posts: 3,704
Rep:
|
take a look here http://tcl.activestate.com/ to find out.
|
|
|
08-17-2002, 11:33 PM
|
#5
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2002
Distribution: damnsmalllinux
Posts: 205
Original Poster
Rep:
|
ah cool, thanks....
i've managed to install it now, but unfortunetly, i still can't compile anything , because, apperantly, "C compiler cannot create executables." i don't understand why not, i am root...
|
|
|
08-18-2002, 12:15 AM
|
#6
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2002
Distribution: damnsmalllinux
Posts: 205
Original Poster
Rep:
|
/gtk+-2.0.6# ./configure
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking whether make sets ${MAKE}... yes
checking for working aclocal... found
checking for working autoconf... found
checking for working automake... found
checking for working autoheader... found
checking for working makeinfo... found
checking for gcc... gcc
checking for C compiler default output... configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
i've looked around some other message boards, and seen that there are alot of others that have the same problem... but no answers. what's the deal?
|
|
|
08-19-2002, 06:03 AM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jan 2002
Location: germany
Distribution: ubuntu, mint, suse
Posts: 1,591
Rep:
|
check
'gcc -v' or 'gcc -version' to see what gcc u have installed
or if u have it at all.
if u donīt have a working compiler u should download an rpm of gcc and install that on ur machine.
maybe someone else knows better...
cheers,
jens
Last edited by j-ray; 08-19-2002 at 06:04 AM.
|
|
|
08-19-2002, 12:41 PM
|
#8
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2002
Distribution: damnsmalllinux
Posts: 205
Original Poster
Rep:
|
wow, i'd find it hard to belive if someone else knew better....
i've actually fixed it now, all i had to do was install the rpm with midnight commander instead of kpackage, which seems like an odd solution, but one that worked none the less
|
|
|
09-01-2002, 04:47 AM
|
#9
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2002
Location: Koom Valley
Distribution: rh8
Posts: 528
Rep:
|
why not just install with rpm at the command line everytime? would it not have the same effect?
|
|
|
09-01-2002, 02:39 PM
|
#10
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2002
Distribution: damnsmalllinux
Posts: 205
Original Poster
Rep:
|
no doubt it would
|
|
|
09-01-2002, 02:59 PM
|
#11
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,149
|
Quote:
Originally posted by tundra
why not just install with rpm at the command line everytime? would it not have the same effect?
|
What if they don't have an RPM based distro like Slackware or Gentoo ?? I know you can use on any distro, but I personally stay away from RPM if I can.
|
|
|
09-01-2002, 10:02 PM
|
#12
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2002
Location: Koom Valley
Distribution: rh8
Posts: 528
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by trickykid
What if they don't have an RPM based distro like Slackware or Gentoo ?? I know you can use on any distro, but I personally stay away from RPM if I can.
|
lol. yea, only a blueblood slacker would say that. i tried to be one, but ah, the vagaries of marketing got me going round and round...
i think the RPM ppl are mostly those who want it fast and convenient. also, it's easily "un-installable". i know it's not much different from compiling from source as it is to type an RPM install command. but some sources don't come with the uninstall option in the makefiles. i've some experience with this and to hunt down the stuff and delete them manually can be a pain...
all that said, i must make clear that i'm not slamming slack. i use it and it's great fun. just stating why i'm not anti-rpm.
oh yea, and in answer to your question tricky, um i thought exigent was talking about an rpm distro.
Last edited by tundra; 09-01-2002 at 10:06 PM.
|
|
|
09-02-2002, 10:01 PM
|
#13
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2002
Distribution: damnsmalllinux
Posts: 205
Original Poster
Rep:
|
yes, you're right i was. but i don't see why an RPM pre-compiled for suse wouldn't work properly on my system, but the same thing done from a command line would.
|
|
|
09-03-2002, 09:01 AM
|
#14
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2002
Location: Koom Valley
Distribution: rh8
Posts: 528
Rep:
|
ah i see. didn't know u were using suse. sorry about that.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:34 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|