[SOLVED] flashplayer

jdkaye · 02-19-2015, 11:58 PM

I'm not sure which luminosity you are referring to. If you mean this one, then it works correctly on Iceweasel 31.4 using the flashplayer-mozilla package Version: 3:11.2.202.442-dmo2. You get it from the deb-multimedia.org repo.
jdk

273 · 02-20-2015, 12:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jdkaye

I'm not sure which luminosity you are referring to. If you mean this one, then it works correctly on Iceweasel 31.4 using the flashplayer-mozilla package Version: 3:11.2.202.442-dmo2. You get it from the deb-multimedia.org repo.
jdk

I don't think de-multimedia.org is needed?

Code:

$ apt-cache policy flashplugin-nonfree
flashplugin-nonfree:
  Installed: 1:3.6.1
  Candidate: 1:3.6.1
  Version table:
 *** 1:3.6.1 0
        500 http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ sid/contrib amd64 Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

beckwith · 02-20-2015, 01:24 AM

I have chromium installed. It too says load the latest flashplayer

273 · 02-20-2015, 01:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beckwith

I have chromium installed. It too says load the latest flashplayer

As I mentioned above, Chromium needs pepperflashplugin-nonfree installing and maintaining in the same was as flashplugin-nonfree.
Only Google Chrome, downloaded dirrect from Google themselves, includes Pepperflash in the package.

jdkaye · 02-20-2015, 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 273

I don't think de-multimedia.org is needed?

Code:

$ apt-cache policy flashplugin-nonfree
flashplugin-nonfree:
  Installed: 1:3.6.1
  Candidate: 1:3.6.1
  Version table:
 *** 1:3.6.1 0
        500 http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ sid/contrib amd64 Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

You're mixing up the two packages. I was referring to flashplayer-mozilla and not flashplugin-nonfree.

Code:

~$ apt-cache policy flashplayer-mozilla
flashplayer-mozilla:
  Installed: 3:11.2.202.442-dmo2
  Candidate: 3:11.2.202.442-dmo2
  Version table:
 *** 3:11.2.202.442-dmo2 0
        500 http://deb-multimedia.org/ testing/non-free amd64 Packages

Note also that it's deb-multimedia.org. Nothing to do with the German language.
jdk

273 · 02-20-2015, 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jdkaye

You're mixing up the two packages. I was referring to flashplayer-mozilla and not flashplugin-nonfree.

Code:

~$ apt-cache policy flashplayer-mozilla
flashplayer-mozilla:
  Installed: 3:11.2.202.442-dmo2
  Candidate: 3:11.2.202.442-dmo2
  Version table:
 *** 3:11.2.202.442-dmo2 0
        500 http://deb-multimedia.org/ testing/non-free amd64 Packages

Note also that it's deb-multimedia.org. Nothing to do with the German language.
jdk

What is the difference though, apart from the name? If one hasn't already got deb-multimedia listed it seems silly to add it for something which can be had without.
Yes, sorry, I didn't notice I'd missed off the 'b' from the url.