Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
|
02-19-2015, 11:58 PM
|
#16
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Dec 2008
Location: Westgate-on-Sea, Kent, UK
Distribution: Debian Testing Amd64
Posts: 5,465
Rep: 
|
I'm not sure which luminosity you are referring to. If you mean this one, then it works correctly on Iceweasel 31.4 using the flashplayer-mozilla package Version: 3:11.2.202.442-dmo2. You get it from the deb-multimedia.org repo.
jdk
|
|
|
02-20-2015, 12:58 AM
|
#17
|
LQ Addict
Registered: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, various VMs
Posts: 7,681
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdkaye
I'm not sure which luminosity you are referring to. If you mean this one, then it works correctly on Iceweasel 31.4 using the flashplayer-mozilla package Version: 3:11.2.202.442-dmo2. You get it from the deb-multimedia.org repo.
jdk
|
I don't think de-multimedia.org is needed?
Code:
$ apt-cache policy flashplugin-nonfree
flashplugin-nonfree:
Installed: 1:3.6.1
Candidate: 1:3.6.1
Version table:
*** 1:3.6.1 0
500 http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ sid/contrib amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
|
|
|
02-20-2015, 01:24 AM
|
#18
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Western Australia
Distribution: Mint / ubuntu
Posts: 118
Original Poster
Rep:
|
I have chromium installed. It too says load the latest flashplayer
|
|
|
02-20-2015, 01:30 AM
|
#19
|
LQ Addict
Registered: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, various VMs
Posts: 7,681
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by beckwith
I have chromium installed. It too says load the latest flashplayer
|
As I mentioned above, Chromium needs pepperflashplugin-nonfree installing and maintaining in the same was as flashplugin-nonfree.
Only Google Chrome, downloaded dirrect from Google themselves, includes Pepperflash in the package.
|
|
|
02-20-2015, 12:46 PM
|
#20
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Dec 2008
Location: Westgate-on-Sea, Kent, UK
Distribution: Debian Testing Amd64
Posts: 5,465
Rep: 
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 273
I don't think de-multimedia.org is needed?
Code:
$ apt-cache policy flashplugin-nonfree
flashplugin-nonfree:
Installed: 1:3.6.1
Candidate: 1:3.6.1
Version table:
*** 1:3.6.1 0
500 http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ sid/contrib amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
|
You're mixing up the two packages. I was referring to flashplayer-mozilla and not flashplugin-nonfree.
Code:
~$ apt-cache policy flashplayer-mozilla
flashplayer-mozilla:
Installed: 3:11.2.202.442-dmo2
Candidate: 3:11.2.202.442-dmo2
Version table:
*** 3:11.2.202.442-dmo2 0
500 http://deb-multimedia.org/ testing/non-free amd64 Packages
Note also that it's deb-multimedia.org. Nothing to do with the German language.
jdk
|
|
|
02-20-2015, 12:49 PM
|
#21
|
LQ Addict
Registered: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, various VMs
Posts: 7,681
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdkaye
You're mixing up the two packages. I was referring to flashplayer-mozilla and not flashplugin-nonfree.
Code:
~$ apt-cache policy flashplayer-mozilla
flashplayer-mozilla:
Installed: 3:11.2.202.442-dmo2
Candidate: 3:11.2.202.442-dmo2
Version table:
*** 3:11.2.202.442-dmo2 0
500 http://deb-multimedia.org/ testing/non-free amd64 Packages
Note also that it's deb-multimedia.org. Nothing to do with the German language.
jdk
|
What is the difference though, apart from the name? If one hasn't already got deb-multimedia listed it seems silly to add it for something which can be had without.
Yes, sorry, I didn't notice I'd missed off the 'b' from the url.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:04 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|