Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
05-01-2006, 02:00 PM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2006
Distribution: Debian Sarge, Windows Server 2003
Posts: 66
Rep:
|
Firefox loads 10x faster in Windows... why?
just another one of those "why?" questions. on my server 2003 firefox comes up instantly when you click the shortcut. here on linux it takes 20-30 seconds. i hear my hard drive rattling intensely for that period of time. is the windows binary easier to load into the memory or something? i mean certain games are faster in linux than windows... like doom 3 and quake 4. overall surfing is not blazing fast. apt-get speeds are mind blowing, very very fast. download speeds on firefox suck. regular mozilla is not a hot-rod either. epiphany is another browser... but there i have to pray for anything to ever come up in general.
dont get me wrong, this is not a slow system - Athlon XP 2600, 768MB RAM, 240GB HD, have 1200MB swap space. this should be more than sufficient (i have a P200, 64MB as my server, apt-get speeds on there are pretty much just as fast). odd huh?
oh yeah... explorer is faster than nautilus. once again... why?
is there a linux version of winrar? Ark and File Roller are a bit slow too. extraction is fast on Ark but it takes forever to compress something (and compression rate isnt great) while winrar does it so much better... and more options too. im sure there are other custom written command line archiver programs for linux... but its just a matter of convenience. ill try winrar on wine sometime. hopefully it wont destroy my filesystem.
winamp under wine comes out faster than xmms and Amarok. what the hell?
|
|
|
05-02-2006, 03:50 AM
|
#2
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Distribution: LFS, SLak, Gentoo, Debian
Posts: 291
Rep:
|
It's not the binary, it's actually the differences in the way the os functions. Linux does not preload anything, it only loads what is currently in use.
Firefox [ and Mozilla's Seamonkey ] both use XUL for the ui, which means that when you start them in linux, the included java interpreter has to be started first.
With windows, the activex interpreter can start creating the UI while XULRunner loads.
|
|
|
05-02-2006, 04:48 AM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: UK
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 3,467
Rep:
|
20 - 30 secs seems a bit extreme though - takes around 5 secs here, on an old athlon 1200
|
|
|
05-02-2006, 08:33 AM
|
#4
|
Member
Registered: May 2006
Posts: 32
Rep:
|
firefox is faster on windows because...
of threads in windows....
|
|
|
05-02-2006, 09:53 AM
|
#5
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: NY
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 200
Rep:
|
It takes exactly 4 seconds on my machine. What distro and WM are you using?
|
|
|
05-02-2006, 10:17 AM
|
#6
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: California
Distribution: SLED 10, openSuSE 10.2, Ubuntu Drapper
Posts: 713
Rep:
|
Disable IPv6
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:31 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|