LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Password
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 07-14-2007, 07:04 PM   #1
svarmido
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2006
Posts: 78

Rep: Reputation: 15
Fedora 7 Live "ACPI Warning (tbfadt 0360): Ignoring BIOS FADT rl C-state control...


Fedora 7 installs but system halts after crc error.

Fedora 7 Live runs in ram without any problem. dmesg output includes a line near the beginning:

"ACPI Warning (tbfadt-0360): Ignoring BIOS FADT rl c-state control [200701]"

Also,

"BIOS BUG: multiple APIC/MADT found. using 0

The first comment "ACPI Warning..." suggests to me that the Live version is ignoring the crc-error instead of halting the system. If so, is there something that can be added to the boot command line to enable the installed Fedora 7 to also ignore the crc-error?

Measures I have taken to rule out sources of the crc-error are:

1) Removed memory modules, replacing them one at a time - trying each separately. System recognizes all memory.
2) Removed DVD RW to eliminate it as a source since I was getting SQUASHFS messages indicating errors.
3) Installed different flavors of Linux and checked integrity of install source. No matter. All create crc-errors and the system halts.
4) Have run disk checking software and both drives - also tried them seperately and both pass the "long" self check.
5) Cooling fans all function properly.
6) Even tried installing WindowsXP - but the installation program could not find a drive...
7) BIOS setup and Linux have no problem recognizing the drive(s).

Finally, dmesg also indicates:

"ATA:abnormal status 0x8 on port 0XF8A3431C"
"ata3 disabling port"

Does this simply indicate the second drive is not installed when in fact it is not?

Why, when the Linux kernel is so efficient at finding and identifying the guts of a computer - can't it report what the source of a crc error is instead of just halting the system?

It would be nice to have a functioning system that ignored a crc-error and thus provides a means for finding the source of the error.

Flummoxed!

svarmido
 
Old 07-16-2007, 07:06 AM   #2
Simon Bridge
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Waiheke NZ
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 9,211

Rep: Reputation: 198Reputation: 198
Looks like you need to enter "linux noapic nolapic" at the boot: prompt. Maybe "noacpi" either. If you installed, but this happened on first boot, then you want to add these options to the kernel line in /boot/grub/grub.conf

But you should go carefully through your BIOS and turn off any special power management support above the minimum.
 
Old 07-17-2007, 06:30 PM   #3
svarmido
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2006
Posts: 78

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
"...bad marshal data"?

I resolved the tbfadt warning by enabling the built in card readers. But,...

Additional information:

The system was working fine before first crc-error. See my thread below for background info.

http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...d.php?t=564008

All memory modules were removed, then tried alone, one by one. Still crc-errors.

I have come to the conclusion there is something amiss with the boot sector, preventing any and all flavors of linux from completing a fresh install. Install continues to 100% stage, then fails with;

<6> SELinux: initialized (dev hda, type iso9660), uses genfs_contexts
<5> SQUASHFS error: zlib_fs returned unexpected result 0xfffffffd, src length 65536
<5> SQUASHFS error: Unable to read page, block 1e0aa28, size 4f86"

My first thought was a problem with the DVD RW/CD drive. But I believe the SQUASHFS error is referring to the boot sector of the hdd.

Comments repeat several times and install stops without successfully installing the boot loader and grub.

I suspect a boot virus and my next step is to "dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda bs=512 count=1" the boot sector (just in case dban didn't affect the boot sector). I have already used dban to zero the drive with one pass.

Additionally, when I tried to install FC6, the install quit with the following message:

"Traceback (most recent call last):

File "/usr/sbin/authconfig, line 26 in?
import authinfo, acutil
File "/usr/share/authconfig/authinfo. py", line 32 in?
import urllib2
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 108, in?
import cookielib
<Space>,<+>,<-> selection /ValueError: bad marshal dataF12
>next screen"

Using TestDisk 6.6 Data Recovery Utility (02/07) Drive specifics are:

/dev/sda - 100GB/93GB - CHS Cylinders 12161, head 255, sectors/track 63, sector size 512.

Given that sector sizes can vary, which is best? 512, 1024, 2028, etc.?

Finally, the ranish partition manager reveals unused space before sda1 and at the end of the drive. This unused space is not displayed by Disk Druid, parted or fdisk.

Any ideas?

svarmido

Last edited by svarmido; 07-17-2007 at 06:41 PM.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bios Bug: FADT size incorrect merkle Linux - Hardware 1 05-11-2007 02:57 PM
cruise control " Warning: -configfile=/cruisecontrol.xml not understood. Ignoring." emailssent Linux - Networking 0 02-28-2005 03:11 AM
ignoring the "non-portable whitespace encountered at line " warning Jake13 Linux - Software 3 08-18-2004 12:34 PM
ACPI Patch for BIOS 25 Dell Inspiron 1100 w/ Fedora Core 1.0 cddesjar Linux - Laptop and Netbook 4 02-19-2004 07:18 PM
ACPI Patch for BIOS 25 Dell Inspiron 1100 w/ Fedora Core 1.0 cddesjar Linux - Laptop and Netbook 0 01-22-2004 09:36 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:59 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration