LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Password
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 04-09-2007, 10:05 PM   #1
person132
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Posts: 30

Rep: Reputation: 15
Eye-candy without composite extension?


I have recently purchased a new laptop and, of course, installed Linux. It has a Mobility Radeon x1700 graphics card in it, so I installed ATI's fglrx driver. The fglrx driver doesn't seem to support the composite extension, but I would like some eye-candy and pretty effects for my new desktop. I have looked at Beryl and Compiz, but they seem to require the compositing extension. Are there open-source drivers that support the composite extension with comparable performance? Are there programs or window managers that provide eye-candy without the composite extension? I keep hearing about "XGl"; what is it?

I am running Slackware 11, if that is any help.
 
Old 04-09-2007, 11:01 PM   #2
IsaacKuo
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
Distribution: Debian Stable
Posts: 2,546
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 465Reputation: 465Reputation: 465Reputation: 465Reputation: 465
I don't know...I'm in the midst of upgrading all my systems to Debian Etch, but after that I'm planning on playing with Beryl. A recent tutorial on installing Beryl on Ubuntu started off with how to REMOVE Ati's fglrx driver and then install/tweak the open source driver. I take it that the open source driver actually works better than Ati's for Beryl.
 
Old 04-09-2007, 11:41 PM   #3
jay73
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2006
Location: Belgium
Distribution: Ubuntu 11.04, Debian testing
Posts: 5,019

Rep: Reputation: 133Reputation: 133
I don't know whether the open source alternative is any better but I do know that it's not available for the 1x00 series.

As for XGL, that is the ATI "equivalent" of Nvidia AIGLX; you should be able to use it for both Compiz and Beryl - but it's my understanding that you'll lose direct rendering in the process.
 
Old 04-10-2007, 12:27 AM   #4
person132
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Posts: 30

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
I am ignorant of the meaning and function of AIGLX (and. therefore, XGL). What is it? I may be able to live without Direct Rendering.
 
Old 04-10-2007, 12:36 AM   #5
jay73
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2006
Location: Belgium
Distribution: Ubuntu 11.04, Debian testing
Posts: 5,019

Rep: Reputation: 133Reputation: 133
See if you can make any sense of this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GLX

In short, GLX is a layer between openGL and the X window system (=the display server) that allows them to interact.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Eye Candy? boyfromthedwarf9 Fedora 4 03-25-2006 02:54 PM
Composite eye candy! With DRI! shpalsam Slackware 3 01-19-2006 04:06 PM
Eye Candy tekwerx Linux - Newbie 18 05-03-2005 10:10 PM
Eye Candy xerverkillah Linux - Software 5 10-04-2004 08:59 AM
Eye-candy gway600 Linux - Software 3 05-29-2004 03:14 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:44 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration