Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
hu? SLAB has been there since the 2.4 series at least and was designed around 1994, is it not old enough? What kernel are you using? I probably just did not understand your question, sorry.
As you can see from reading the kernel source, there have been several memory-allocator schemes used in different generations of the kernel. The most-recent one is based on "slabs," which takes full advantage of the fact that kernel memory-allocations usually ask for and release memory blocks of only a few well-known sizes. In other words, if you know that (among other things) you're constantly allocating and releasing blocks of (say...) 148 bytes, it's a very good idea to set-aside a larger chunk of memory (a "slab") just for allocations of that size.
In this way, a particular "slab" basically won't fragment. You don't have to waste a lot of time joining adjacent blocks together. The tradeoff is that you "waste" memory... but these days, "frankly, who cares?" (Memory we got, but microseconds are as precious as ever.)
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.