Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
May I enquire why you think you want antialiasing OFF for all fonts?
It won't give you a performance boost.
That said, various bitmap fonts exist and fontconfig can be told to not scale them.
Font size matters - you can only choose such sizes that the font is designed for.
On my distro, the traditional formats are being replaced by OTB fonts.
Because that's the way I like it, crisp and clear. I could ask you the same question BTW. On old computers (Amiga) there was no text antialiasing, so I got used to jagged lines. I might use it when my monitor has 300DPI or similar but it probably won't matter then. High contrast makes text easier to read, I think.
Fonts on Linux are known problem, and its mind boggling that its not yet solved. The relevant patents expired long ago.
If the OP wants antialiasing off, then I think you need a font file where someone has generated each character by hand (bitmap fonts) and I'm guessing they need to do this for the size 8 to 15 or so. It would have to be for low DPI monitors.
Good news:
MS has already done the job for us.
I have installed the MS fonts on my system.
I turned off antialiasing and I use Arial.
Sweet spots for fonts are multiples of 4, with 12 & 24 being better than 4 or 8. Also, scalable fonts are historically designed for 96 DPI, and suffer drastically as DPI falls, which means they improve immensely as DPI rises. Depending on your eyes, screen distance, and physical screen density & composition, the reasons for fonts manipulation are mostly gone by somewhere between 120 & 144 DPI. To illustrate, @96DPI a 12pt font has a nominal glyph pixel count of 72, while @120DPI, +25%, it has risen to 200. 6X12 vs. 10x12. @144, +50%, it has risen to 12x24 & 288. If you really want great fonts, get the screen density up, logically, physically, or both.
Because that's the way I like it, crisp and clear. I could ask you the same question BTW. On old computers (Amiga) there was no text antialiasing, so I got used to jagged lines. I might use it when my monitor has 300DPI or similar but it probably won't matter then. High contrast makes text easier to read, I think.
Fonts on Linux are known problem, and its mind boggling that its not yet solved. The relevant patents expired long ago.
No need to get testy, the question was technically justified.
Fonts on Linux might have been a known problem, but it has been solved. I have no problems at all, and my monitor isn't hi-res either. Usually it's just a question of installing the right fonts.
Anyhow, antialiasing OFF:
Create a file ~/.config/fontconfig/fonts.conf that contains at least this:
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.