Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
|
01-23-2010, 06:52 PM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2009
Location: England
Distribution: Kubuntu, Ubuntu, Debian, Proxmox.
Posts: 553
Rep:
|
Chromium/Google Chrome - can I get these features?
I've installed Chromium (version 4.0.249.64 (35722)) on my computer, and the speed is impressive, outdoing Firefox in both benchmarks and real browsing. But, I find it lacking some features. I wish to know if these features are available, and if so, how to enable them. The features are:
* Separate search bar. While I know I can search from the address bar, to have to configure and then remember names for a dozen or so search engines is a little annoying. I much prefer the Firefox way.
* Ad Blocking. Sooner or later there'll be an obnoxious ad that gets on my nerves, hijacks my browser, hangs the tab, etc.
* NoScript. Again, sooner or later I'll encounter a site with a troublesome script.
* Chinese and Japanese characters. Not that I understand them, but square boxes in their place are ugly.
* A chromium specific thing this - a way to distinguish the processes for each tab. If one manages to hang my whole system and I need to kill it from the console, a way to know which to kill would obviously be rather helpful. I suppose there's Process ID, relating to time started, but that's no good if all the tabs have been open for a while.
|
|
|
01-23-2010, 08:36 PM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Manalapan, NJ
Distribution: Fedora x86 and x86_64, Debian PPC and ARM, Android
Posts: 4,593
|
For process management, Chrome has its own: Shift-Esc in Chrome brings up the task manager, and you can end processes there. Ad Blocking and NoScript are not there yet. There are early versions available, but they don't work too well and are not worth the effort at this point. The Chrome search configuration lets you assign a single character to search a particular site (e.g. 'w' for wikipedia), which is very flexible and convenient. If you use it for a while, you'll find it faster than a search bar.
|
|
|
01-23-2010, 08:59 PM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: dallas, tx
Distribution: Slackware - current multilib/gsb Arch
Posts: 1,949
|
Does anyone know how to change the useragent in Chrome/Chromium?
|
|
|
01-23-2010, 09:04 PM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Manalapan, NJ
Distribution: Fedora x86 and x86_64, Debian PPC and ARM, Android
Posts: 4,593
|
You can start Chrome with the --user-agent="something" option to change the user agent.
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
01-27-2010, 11:14 PM
|
#5
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2009
Location: England
Distribution: Kubuntu, Ubuntu, Debian, Proxmox.
Posts: 553
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Another issue, which Googling around has shown no answer to - how do I opem a file in a helper application? Say something like a PDF, or a word document. I don't want an in-browser plugin, I want to download the file and have epdfview, openoffice, whatever launched automatically.
It does increasingly look like though chromium is fast, that speed comes at the cost of a severe lack of features and configurability.
|
|
|
01-27-2010, 11:21 PM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Manalapan, NJ
Distribution: Fedora x86 and x86_64, Debian PPC and ARM, Android
Posts: 4,593
|
Docs PDF/PowerPoint Viewer (by Google)
Automatically previews pdfs, powerpoint presentations, and other documents in Google Docs Viewer.
https://chrome.google.com/extensions...edmbmedengocbn
|
|
|
01-27-2010, 11:39 PM
|
#7
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2009
Location: England
Distribution: Kubuntu, Ubuntu, Debian, Proxmox.
Posts: 553
Original Poster
Rep:
|
But that is not what I want. I want to use my standard desktop applications.
The current behaviour has been that after downloading, Chromium offers to open files when I click them in the downloaded files bar that appears at the bottom. Which it does using...Firefox. Which then opens them in the intended application. Utterly, utterly, pointless behaviour by Chromium there.
I've found the settings file, ~/.config/chromium/Default/Preferences, but it's not very informative. The section pertaining to downloads is:
Code:
"download": {
"default_directory": "/home/tw296/docs",
"directory_upgrade": true,
"extensions_to_open": "",
"prompt_for_download": true
},
I suppose the key troubleshooting question here is WHY is chromium offering to open saved PDF, Excel Spreadsheet, and other files, in Firefox of all things! This has to be configured somewhere - where?
|
|
|
01-27-2010, 11:45 PM
|
#8
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Manalapan, NJ
Distribution: Fedora x86 and x86_64, Debian PPC and ARM, Android
Posts: 4,593
|
Your mimetypes. The question is, why do you want to open them locally? There's no downloading, it's faster, and you use Google's resources instead of your own (can be important if you're using a slow machine or connection). You don't have to worry about malformed PDFs exploiting a security weakness in your viewer. You can print the file or save it after viewing, so there's really no loss of functionality.
|
|
|
01-28-2010, 12:16 AM
|
#9
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2009
Location: England
Distribution: Kubuntu, Ubuntu, Debian, Proxmox.
Posts: 553
Original Poster
Rep:
|
When you say "Your mimetypes", do you mean to say that it is some sort of system default setting
Well it's not just pdf files. It's a problem with pretty much any file. Torrents would be another good example - I'd want to immediately open the .torrent file in my torrent client. Google Docs can't do that.
Also it's a matter of preference. I don't like this "do everything in the browser" mentality.
|
|
|
01-28-2010, 11:55 AM
|
#10
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Manalapan, NJ
Distribution: Fedora x86 and x86_64, Debian PPC and ARM, Android
Posts: 4,593
|
It sounds like you want to use Firefox instead of Chrome, at least right now.
|
|
|
01-28-2010, 01:45 PM
|
#11
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2009
Location: England
Distribution: Kubuntu, Ubuntu, Debian, Proxmox.
Posts: 553
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Except for the fact that Firefox (well, at least the build in Arch's repos) is noticeably slower. I can't go back to that slowness. (I know there are some supposed Firefox speed-up tweaks, but I tried them before and they didn't seem to help that much). So now I'll never be happy with my browser :-(
|
|
|
01-28-2010, 02:01 PM
|
#12
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Manalapan, NJ
Distribution: Fedora x86 and x86_64, Debian PPC and ARM, Android
Posts: 4,593
|
Firefox 3.6 is about 20% faster than 3.5. If you autostart and minimize (using devilspie/gdevilspie) Firefox on login, the startup time is effectively eliminated. When Firefox implements multiple processes, performance will improve again on multi-core machines.
Firefox issues are really off topic for this thread, though.
|
|
|
01-28-2010, 03:55 PM
|
#13
|
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: dallas, tx
Distribution: Slackware - current multilib/gsb Arch
Posts: 1,949
|
Just as a test I downloaded a .pdf in Chrome and clicked on it in the bar and it opened with okular. Nothing opens FF that I can tell, although I did have to build against mozilla (seamonkey was the default, but I edited to build against FF3.6). But I'm using the Chrome beta, built with a slackbuild from the Chrome.deb file rather than Chromium itself. I've run both, and find for the most part they are the same.
|
|
|
01-28-2010, 04:08 PM
|
#14
|
LQ 5k Club
Registered: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,443
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cantab
Except for the fact that Firefox (well, at least the build in Arch's repos) is noticeably slower. I can't go back to that slowness. (I know there are some supposed Firefox speed-up tweaks, but I tried them before and they didn't seem to help that much). So now I'll never be happy with my browser :-(
|
Funny thing is that for me, even though Chromium passes all the tests visibly faster, it takes ages to load a simple web page.
|
|
|
01-29-2010, 11:29 AM
|
#15
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2010
Location: Twickenham, UK
Distribution: OpenSolaris2009.06x86 || Linpus Lite 1.2 ||Debian (Lenny kernel 2.6 && Gnome 2)
Posts: 43
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cantab
* Ad Blocking. Sooner or later there'll be an obnoxious ad that gets on my nerves, hijacks my browser, hangs the tab, etc.
|
If you have the Developer (i.e. Beta) version of the DEB installed, you get to DL this from the Extensions gallery (it's added to the Configure menu under Downloads). On DEB-based systems this does add a Repo' to your sources list though.
Also, AdThwart (port of Fx AdBlock) and something else called AdBlock are on the Most Popular list. Keep checking back for:
Quote:
Originally Posted by cantab
* NoScript. Again, sooner or later I'll encounter a site with a troublesome script.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cantab
* Chinese and Japanese characters. Not that I understand them, but square boxes in their place are ugly.
|
You're a YAST-user? Surely that has something in it for specific fonts (e.g. *-fonts-zh-han or *-fonts-ja)?
Last edited by GrubbySeismic; 01-29-2010 at 11:43 AM.
Reason: Spelling mistake
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:28 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|