Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
|
05-03-2015, 05:29 AM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: Nokia (town), Finland
Distribution: Mint, Debian
Posts: 601
Rep:
|
Calligra vs. LibreOffice
I'm running Slackware 14.1 on an oldish laptop (StinkBad T42), and I wonder if I should get rid of the Calligra and get LibreOffice instead.
Any comments?
Are there areas where Calligra much better than LibreOffice?
I understand that OpenOffice has become more or less obsolete.
At least my experience on the above mentioned machine is that Calligra is "once per boot" SW. When you close a file and try to open another one, it seems to freeze. Does it leak memory or something?
Which one is in general lighter?
|
|
|
05-03-2015, 10:55 AM
|
#2
|
LQ Veteran
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: London
Distribution: PCLinuxOS, Salix
Posts: 6,243
|
I've never used Calligra, but I did read a couple of reviews, both of which described it as not reliable enough for professional use.
OpenOffice is certainly not obsolete: many of us prefer it to LibreOffice for various reasons. Even though it's not the default for any Linus distro, it has millions of users for the Windows version, as well as the Sun version. I use OpenOffice on my Thinkpad X31 with Salix Linux and have no problems. Of course, if your Slackware is KDE, that will slow things down compared to my Xfce.
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
05-03-2015, 11:22 AM
|
#3
|
Moderator
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Arizona, USA
Distribution: Debian, EndeavourOS, OpenSUSE, KDE Neon
Posts: 4,029
|
I've used Calligra a few times, and IMO, the reviews David read are correct, plus the interface is...weird. If you're not used to MS Office, Calligra might be great, but if you're used to years and years of using MS Office, Wordperfect Office, etc, it's difficult to get used to Calligra.
|
|
|
05-03-2015, 12:21 PM
|
#4
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: Nokia (town), Finland
Distribution: Mint, Debian
Posts: 601
Original Poster
Rep:
|
My Slacky is Xfce too, but Calligra was there by default.
I guess OoO and LibreOffice are more stable too.
I have used OoO on a windows machine because it handles PDFs far better than LibreOffice, but maybe I had old versions? Especially LibreOffice couldn't read in PDFs to be edited (I think).
I had to edit my CV that I wrote at work with MS Office and saved as PDF.
The OoO version (Windows) is 4.1.1. I think I tried with LibreOffice on Linux, but don't remember the LibreOffice version (or the machine I tried it on).
|
|
|
05-03-2015, 12:30 PM
|
#5
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: Nokia (town), Finland
Distribution: Mint, Debian
Posts: 601
Original Poster
Rep:
|
So the OpenOffice is back on the table.
Which one you'd recommend - oldish laptop, quite some docs from M$ world too.
[EDIT]
I guess I'd try OoO, but maybe LibreOffice noticeably is lighter?
[/EDIT]
Last edited by turboscrew; 05-03-2015 at 12:39 PM.
|
|
|
05-03-2015, 01:10 PM
|
#6
|
LQ 5k Club
Registered: Jan 2008
Location: Copenhagen DK
Distribution: PCLinuxOS2023 Fedora38 + 50+ other Linux OS, for test only.
Posts: 17,520
|
For best compatibility with M$, I'd still prefer the good old (commercial) TextMaker
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TextMaker
"" Development of TextMaker started in 1987 under MS-DOS.
The program aims at utmost compatibility with Microsoft Word,
(adding some proprietary features like an object mode for working with frames or a simple built-in database functionality) ""
. http://www.freeoffice.com/
. http://www.freeoffice.com/en/downloa...le-office?id=1
>>> softmaker-freeoffice-697.i386.rpm , 62.7 MB
and softmaker-freeoffice-697.x86_64.rpm, 62.8 MB.
-
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
05-03-2015, 02:35 PM
|
#7
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: Nokia (town), Finland
Distribution: Mint, Debian
Posts: 601
Original Poster
Rep:
|
@knudfl: Not THAT many docs from M$ world. ;-D
(But thanks for the hint. A couple of my friends might find it useful.)
|
|
|
05-03-2015, 03:20 PM
|
#8
|
LQ 5k Club
Registered: Jan 2008
Location: Copenhagen DK
Distribution: PCLinuxOS2023 Fedora38 + 50+ other Linux OS, for test only.
Posts: 17,520
|
@turboscrew.
... And there are other advantages with Textmaker :
Small footprint, opens very fast, the new 2015 update -697 : 2 - 3 seconds.
And can do tricks that Word(2003) / OpenOffice couldn't do.
.. Like 1 line space between lines : More lines each page.
( I used that for a one page manual for some equipment.)
-
|
|
|
05-03-2015, 04:34 PM
|
#9
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: Nokia (town), Finland
Distribution: Mint, Debian
Posts: 601
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Suddenly... that name "Textmaker"...
It doesn't happen to have something to do with the old FrameMaker/PageMaker?
I might try Textmaker later, but at the moment I've been wrestling with tables
(trying to make some sense about ARM instruction encodings).
And I'm working on Slackware. I don't think there is a package, and I'm not into
putting together one now. And if I don't, and if I'd like to remove it, it'd be a
PITA.
|
|
|
05-03-2015, 08:08 PM
|
#10
|
LQ 5k Club
Registered: Jan 2008
Location: Copenhagen DK
Distribution: PCLinuxOS2023 Fedora38 + 50+ other Linux OS, for test only.
Posts: 17,520
|
Re #9.
Please follow the Textmaker / Softmaker links in post #6.
To know what it is.
Slackware comes with the 'rpm' command.
And you can do : # rpm -Uvh --nodeps softmaker-freeoffice-697.<arch>.rpm
The terminal reply is :
. ........
... ... installing softmaker-freeoffice-2012-697 ################## [100]
And you have these new entries in the Menu :
>> Office > { FreeOffice Planmaker, FreeOffice Presentations, FreeOffice TextMaker }.
Removing : # rpm -e softmaker-freeoffice-2012-697
-
Last edited by knudfl; 05-03-2015 at 09:16 PM.
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
05-03-2015, 08:14 PM
|
#11
|
Moderator
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Arizona, USA
Distribution: Debian, EndeavourOS, OpenSUSE, KDE Neon
Posts: 4,029
|
As a user of softmaker office (commercial version of free office), I'm fairly certain there is a package that will work with Slackware. I'm pretty sure I have it on my external drive for when I'm setting up others machines. Just FYI if you want to try it out. I will say free office (or softmaker office if you wanted to pay) has WAY better compatibility with ms office then LO or OoO. Not even funny how much better the compatibility is.
|
|
|
05-04-2015, 01:54 AM
|
#12
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: Nokia (town), Finland
Distribution: Mint, Debian
Posts: 601
Original Poster
Rep:
|
@knudfl, Timothy Miller:
Yes, there seems to be rpm installed. I didn't know that.
I already installed OoO, but I think I'll try FreeOffice too.
|
|
|
05-04-2015, 02:59 AM
|
#13
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: Nokia (town), Finland
Distribution: Mint, Debian
Posts: 601
Original Poster
Rep:
|
I'd still like to get answers to the original question.
|
|
|
05-04-2015, 06:47 AM
|
#14
|
LQ 5k Club
Registered: Jan 2008
Location: Copenhagen DK
Distribution: PCLinuxOS2023 Fedora38 + 50+ other Linux OS, for test only.
Posts: 17,520
|
Re #13.
Old hardware : Textmaker wins over LibreOffice.
Calligra : Never used it.
|
|
|
05-05-2015, 05:29 AM
|
#15
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: Nokia (town), Finland
Distribution: Mint, Debian
Posts: 601
Original Poster
Rep:
|
I'm not totally convinced...
Code:
bash-4.2# rpm -i softmaker-freeoffice-698.i386.rpm
warning: Generating 12 missing index(es), please wait...
error: Failed dependencies:
/bin/sh is needed by softmaker-freeoffice-2012-698.i386
libX11.so.6 is needed by softmaker-freeoffice-2012-698.i386
libXext.so.6 is needed by softmaker-freeoffice-2012-698.i386
libXmu.so.6 is needed by softmaker-freeoffice-2012-698.i386
libXrender.so.1 is needed by softmaker-freeoffice-2012-698.i386
libc.so.6 is needed by softmaker-freeoffice-2012-698.i386
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) is needed by softmaker-freeoffice-2012-698.i386
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) is needed by softmaker-freeoffice-2012-698.i386
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) is needed by softmaker-freeoffice-2012-698.i386
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2) is needed by softmaker-freeoffice-2012-698.i386
libdl.so.2 is needed by softmaker-freeoffice-2012-698.i386
libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.0) is needed by softmaker-freeoffice-2012-698.i386
libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.1) is needed by softmaker-freeoffice-2012-698.i386
libm.so.6 is needed by softmaker-freeoffice-2012-698.i386
libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) is needed by softmaker-freeoffice-2012-698.i386
libstdc++.so.6 is needed by softmaker-freeoffice-2012-698.i386
bash-4.2# which sh
/bin/sh
bash-4.2$ pwd
/usr/lib
bash-4.2$ find . -name "lib*.so.6" -print
./libFLAC++.so.6
./libICE.so.6
./libXaw6.so.6
./libXt.so.6
./libXmu.so.6
./libFS.so.6
./libtasn1.so.6
./libstdc++.so.6
./libxfce4util.so.6
./libkactivities.so.6
./libk3blib.so.6
./libXaw.so.6
./libSM.so.6
./libkdegames.so.6
./libXext.so.6
./libX11.so.6
./libfreetype.so.6
./libXau.so.6
./libXtst.so.6
./libffi.so.6
./libXaw3d.so.6
./libweather_ion.so.6
./libk3bdevice.so.6
./libgphoto2.so.6
./libXp.so.6
./libXdmcp.so.6
./libXi.so.6
bash-4.2$ cd ../../lib
bash-4.2$ find . -name "lib*.so.6" -print
./libc.so.6
./libm.so.6
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:09 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|