Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
07-23-2003, 06:20 PM
|
#1
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,786
|
Browser wanted: plain and simple
I'm looking for a web browser to include in an LFS system (<= no GNOME or KDE, and don't plan to install either... just Enlightenment and X). Mozilla requires an unbelievable number of supporting libraries, and I know half of that junk is for stuff I don't want.
I tried Mozilla-firebird, but I couldn't get it to run. The script they provided never could find the executable, and I didn't feel like hacking up the already author-proclaimed "hack"ed script.
If you search for "web browser" on freshmeat.net, you get a ton of useless results that would take forever to wade through.
So, any suggestions? It doesn't have to be the fastest, prettiest, or the swiss-army-knife of the internet... just a browser.
|
|
|
07-23-2003, 06:35 PM
|
#2
|
Moderator
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: earth
Distribution: slackware by choice, others too :} ... android.
Posts: 23,067
|
If you don't mind the qt-interface Opera is
certainly a good choice ... not very feature-rich,
but fast at what it does: dillo.
|
|
|
07-23-2003, 06:50 PM
|
#3
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,042
Rep:
|
An old fashion text based web browser, Lynx
Light on memory, Galeon
Fast web page loading and pop-up zapper, Opera.
|
|
|
07-23-2003, 07:05 PM
|
#4
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2002
Location: Lower Alabama
Distribution: Slackware, OpenBSD 3.9
Posts: 344
Rep:
|
Bare-bones, no features, tiny browser: http://www.dillo.org (Needs GTK+)
Ian
|
|
|
07-23-2003, 07:55 PM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,786
Original Poster
|
Thanks guys. I think I'll give Dillo a shot first.
Opera was lurking in the back of my mind. I don't know exactly what their licensing scheme is (pay-only, free for personal use, etc), but that can be remedied by a trip to their website I'm sure. I'm not opposed to paying for closed source software, but if I am going to buy it, it's got to beat the open source alternatives.
I've used Galeon before and thought it was nice, but isn't it for GNOME only? Again, a trip to their website ought to answer that question. Things are getting complicated because I'm now seeing Gnome apps that are supposed to run under KDE and vice versa. I don't know enough about GNOME or KDE to know what services they provide that X and a window manager don't. Which then leaves me even more in the dark about whether they would run under my setup.
|
|
|
07-23-2003, 08:00 PM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2003
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 4,113
Rep:
|
Mostly, you don't need Gnome or KDE for anything. You just need their libraries to run their apps. Opera is adware - you can buy it or use it for free with banners flashing in your face. I hate the concept.
For text, w3m - much more powerful and coherent than lynx, and just as good where not better. I think it maye require a library or two but no big deal.
Of course, there was that seg faulting issue but I'm sure that was my fault.
|
|
|
07-23-2003, 08:17 PM
|
#7
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2002
Location: Riverside, CA
Distribution: Slackware Convert!!
Posts: 210
Rep:
|
I use links as opposed to lynx.
|
|
|
07-23-2003, 11:49 PM
|
#8
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,786
Original Poster
|
The Dillo developers are NOT kidding when they they say Dillo is fast. It's unreal! It still needs some work, but I'm sure that's why it's a 0.7.X release and not a 1.X.X.
|
|
|
07-24-2003, 01:13 AM
|
#9
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Atlantic City, NJ
Distribution: Ubuntu & Arch
Posts: 3,503
Rep:
|
When I read this thread and heard about this dillo browser I thought to myself how fast could it be. Well, its worth installing just to see. It really is amazingly fast. Oh yeah...try to go to a microsoft site like www.hotmail.com . Of course, it doesn't work.
|
|
|
07-24-2003, 02:25 AM
|
#10
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Slovenia
Distribution: Slackware & FreeBSD
Posts: 209
Rep:
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:22 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|