Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
11-24-2004, 08:56 PM
|
#1
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2004
Posts: 9
Rep:
|
Best Linux Envirnoment
I am about to install Linux on my HP Laptop (see my topic in laptop section). I was wondering: what is the fastest environment for Linux. I am only familiar w/ KDE and Gnome, but I am sure there are others. I want something that is very functional, but doesn't hog my system resources.
|
|
|
11-24-2004, 09:03 PM
|
#2
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: old village
Distribution: android, BSD, CentOS, Ubuntu
Posts: 221
Rep:
|
slackware is very streamlined.. but you have to have some CLI background...
i've been running slackware for about 4 years, and its a manual process, but it is very fast, and has a lot ov advantages, IMHO over redhat and mandrake, which seem to use a lot more system resources..
if i can be ov any assistance, let me know...
|
|
|
11-24-2004, 09:11 PM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: old village
Distribution: android, BSD, CentOS, Ubuntu
Posts: 221
Rep:
|
BTW.. slack 8-10 all come with KDE and Gnome as installed Desktop environments...
if you want.. you can also install others.. but it requires a bit ov tweaking on your .xinitrc .. i have a little experience with this, so feel free to ask, if you want...
-sg
|
|
|
11-24-2004, 09:58 PM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: NB,Canada
Distribution: Something alpha or beta, binary or source...
Posts: 2,280
Rep:
|
If you want lighter and faster, but still functional and easy to configure, I'd try XFCE4. Its got lotsa tools and toys, but it'll run on much slower hardware than KDE and even Gnome will, by a long shot. If you want less turned on by default, you're best off with Slack or Debian (or Maybe Mandrake), than you would be with Suse or Fedora. These are just my personal observations, though.
One other thing that I have observed is that if you don't run a Desktop Manager like KDM, GDM, or XDM, then your system will be a lot more responsive (as in starting X with "startx" instead of clicking on a pretty login box)
Last edited by vectordrake; 11-24-2004 at 10:00 PM.
|
|
|
11-25-2004, 01:20 AM
|
#5
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Pisteso
Distribution: Debian Sarge/Sid
Posts: 10
Rep:
|
Vectordrake has a point about the desktop managers...
If you want a light environment, first thing to have on mind is to resist the toys (I'm not good resisting), but depending on the taste of the user, Window Maker and Black Box are good alternatives. They are not the fastest environments, but they are lighter than KDE or Gnome, and have nice look & feel...
In the end it's just matter of taste...
I'm running Gnome 2.8 on a PII 233MHz - 160 ram laptop and it works nice.
|
|
|
11-25-2004, 02:43 AM
|
#6
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2003
Distribution: Fedora Core 4
Posts: 99
Rep:
|
Just read this review of Xfce today. Haven't used it ever, but it seemed to match what you were asking about, from what I remember.
|
|
|
11-26-2004, 12:38 PM
|
#7
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2004
Posts: 9
Original Poster
Rep:
|
I have been looking at Yoper Linux recently, how does it compare to slack?
|
|
|
11-26-2004, 02:23 PM
|
#8
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2004
Distribution: Arch :D
Posts: 66
Rep:
|
Xfce is definitely what you're looking for. Grab the latest 4.2 beta installer, it's very stable.
|
|
|
11-26-2004, 03:07 PM
|
#9
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2004
Posts: 9
Original Poster
Rep:
|
so, I install my distro, and then do install xfce from kde or gnome?
|
|
|
11-26-2004, 03:22 PM
|
#10
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Distribution: Kubuntu 14.04 LTS
Posts: 915
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Glutton88
so, I install my distro, and then do install xfce from kde or gnome?
|
If your distro provides installable packages for Xfce, all you have to do is install it. Xfce should then show up as one of the desktop managers available on the GUI login screen. If not, it's a bit trickier. As someone else said above, you will need to tweak your X Window initialization file (~/.xinitrc) to invoke Xfce.
And yes, you could install Xfce from within KDE or GNOME or whatever else, though it's probably easier to do it from the command line.
|
|
|
11-26-2004, 03:44 PM
|
#11
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2004
Posts: 9
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Sounds good. So would Yoper linux + xfce be a fast combination?
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:58 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|