LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Password
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 01-15-2006, 12:27 PM   #1
suavecu
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Brooklyn
Distribution: Slackware 10.2
Posts: 87

Rep: Reputation: 15
ATI drivers


I'm trying to install a driver into my fedora 4 system and I am having no luck at all (ATI All-In-Wonder 9600). When I try to use the auto install driver (ati-driver-installer-8.20.8-i386.run) by typing in ./ati-driver-installer-8.20.8-i386.run I get an error message saying permission is denied even though I'm using my root login in the terminal. So then I tried using the fglrx_6_8_0-8.20.8-1.i386.rpm driver for Xorg 6.8 (I have 6.8) using yum install, but when I tried that I got an error saying Package fglrx_6_8_0-8.20.8-1.i386.rpm is not signed. Finally I tried installing the same package with rpm -i and I got an error that said file /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1.2 from install of fglrx_6_8_0-8.20.8-1 conflicts with file from package xorg-x11-Mesa-libGL-6.8.2-37.FC4.49.2

I'm completely out of ideas, but I'm sick of having to set my font at 16 (for mozilla, 12 for Konqueror) due to the fact that my fonts are blury.

Any help with this would be greatly appreciated

Thanks
 
Old 01-15-2006, 12:30 PM   #2
erimar77
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Posts: 76

Rep: Reputation: 15
to make the ati driver executable then run it:

Code:
chmod 777 ati-driver-installer-8.20.8-i386.run

./ati-driver-installer-8.20.8-i386.run
then do what you tried before... you'll have to be sure kde or gnome isn't running, i think you can hit ctrl-alt-backspace to kill it
 
Old 01-15-2006, 01:13 PM   #3
suavecu
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Brooklyn
Distribution: Slackware 10.2
Posts: 87

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Thank you, that worked, still blury, but I gained 200 pixels in the process. However, I'm still 200 short of what I get with XP (1440 x 900) but at least it's a start.
 
Old 01-15-2006, 08:29 PM   #4
leif81
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: kingston, canada
Distribution: Fedora
Posts: 20

Rep: Reputation: 0
Open up the Xorg configuration file /etc/X11/xorg.conf

Inside you'll see something like this
Code:
Section "Screen"
        Identifier "Screen0"
        Device     "Videocard0"
        Monitor    "Monitor0"
        DefaultDepth     16
        SubSection "Display"
                Viewport   0 0
                Depth     16
                Modes    "800x600" "640x480"
        EndSubSection
EndSection
Set the Modes line manually to the possible desktop resolutions you would like to be able to choose from in gnome/kde. The first mode you list will be the one used by default so long as it is an acceptable mode for your screen.
 
Old 01-16-2006, 06:40 AM   #5
cwhalen
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada
Distribution: Slackware, Gentoo
Posts: 16

Rep: Reputation: 0
May I ask what kernel version you're running?

I'm trying to get this same driver working on 2.6.15 (with a different card) but I end up with unresolved symbols at compile time and the module will not insert.

I'm just wondering as a reference.
 
Old 01-16-2006, 01:40 PM   #6
suavecu
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Brooklyn
Distribution: Slackware 10.2
Posts: 87

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by cwhalen
May I ask what kernel version you're running?

I'm trying to get this same driver working on 2.6.15 (with a different card) but I end up with unresolved symbols at compile time and the module will not insert.

I'm just wondering as a reference.

2.6.14-1.1656_FC4smp is the Kernel that I am using.

Quote:
Originally Posted by leif81
ppen up the Xorg configuration file /etc/X11/xorg.conf

Inside you'll see something like this
Code:

Quote:
Section "Screen" Identifier "Screen0" Device "Videocard0" Monitor "Monitor0" DefaultDepth 16 SubSection "Display" Viewport 0 0 Depth 16 Modes "800x600" "640x480" EndSubSection EndSection

Set the Modes line manually to the possible desktop resolutions you would like to be able to choose from in gnome/kde. The first mode you list will be the one used by default so long as it is an acceptable mode for your screen.
I'll give it a try, thanks
 
Old 01-16-2006, 02:25 PM   #7
suavecu
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Brooklyn
Distribution: Slackware 10.2
Posts: 87

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
I'm so much happier now. In fact, I can even try the GNOME's setting again because everything is the right size and nothing is blury anymore. Thank you everyone who helped me with this. This might have been the end for me as a linux user as I was getting real tired of having a blury screen.
 
Old 01-16-2006, 05:00 PM   #8
chasr
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: Hartford, CT USA
Distribution: lfs
Posts: 11

Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
I'm so much happier now. In fact, I can even try the GNOME's setting again because everything is the right size and nothing is blury anymore. Thank you everyone who helped me with this. This might have been the end for me as a linux user as I was getting real tired of having a blury screen.
How nice! I suspect it'll now soon be the end for you as a windows user.

I see you're using gnome, but just for fun you might want to try doing some web browsing with konquerer from the kde suite.

Good Luck
 
Old 01-17-2006, 08:33 PM   #9
suavecu
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Brooklyn
Distribution: Slackware 10.2
Posts: 87

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
I would like to becuase I really like Konquor (when I'm in KDE), but I can't get it to be my default browser (when in KDE). I've gone to kcontrol and set the browser component to Konquor, yet when I type htmlview I still get mozilla Any guesses?

Feroda 4, KDE 3.5
 
Old 01-18-2006, 08:59 PM   #10
Jaxån
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: Sweden
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 142

Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by erimar77
to make the ati driver executable then run it:

Code:
chmod 777 ati-driver-installer-8.20.8-i386.run

./ati-driver-installer-8.20.8-i386.run
Better to use this, as it only change what you need. That is to add x (execute) rights to your file. And you should NEVER, EVER change to 777, becouse it give everyone ALL rights to that file. That is, it is more or less like MS Windows, and that we don't want, right?
Code:
chmod +x ati-driver-installer-8.20.8-i386.run
This gives every one x right. You might only give that to the owner, so do this instead
Code:
chmod u+x file
For more information, please use the man command.
Code:
man chmod
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
8.6.20 ATI Drivers and ATI Radeon XPress 200M ltracy Linux - Hardware 8 04-28-2006 07:52 PM
ATI drivers for old ATI Rage LT Pro card? Kramer Linux - Hardware 7 12-22-2005 09:55 AM
ATI 9600Pro & ATI Proprietary Drivers problem Hyakutake Slackware 6 12-04-2005 10:08 AM
SuSE 9.1 - ATI Mobility 9600 (M10) - ATi Drivers 3.9.0 Beaviis Linux - Hardware 3 06-04-2004 12:51 PM
Red Hat9 + ATi Drivers + nForce2 Drivers sturreal Linux - Newbie 2 10-07-2003 07:17 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:28 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration