Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
06-15-2004, 03:54 PM
|
#1
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jun 2004
Posts: 7
Rep:
|
Ashton-Tate's dBase Equivalent
While I understand that there are many "real" DBMS available for Linux, I was wondering why any of the Ashton-Tate's dBase equivalents (or clones) for Linux are not popular? [These include dbMAN, Flagship, and Max.]
The ease of ease of use in dBase and FoxBase (later FoxPro)'s dot command was remarkable. Endusers like me, learnt basic commands like CREAte, APPEnd, DELEte, SORT, INDEx, DISPlay, etc. to manage data in multiple files.
Would like to know if there is actually a *good* dBase clone for Linux? I am especially intrested in dot commands, and (sadly!) not looking for SQL-only databases.
|
|
|
06-15-2004, 07:38 PM
|
#2
|
Moderator
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: earth
Distribution: slackware by choice, others too :} ... android.
Posts: 23,067
|
I've searched a bit, and the only thing that comes
anywhere close to what you want is this
http://www.fship.com/priceUSD.html#Free_Personal
I guess ... no, I haven't seen/tested it ;)
Cheers,
Tink
|
|
|
06-16-2004, 03:43 PM
|
#3
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jun 2004
Posts: 7
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Flagship does not have the dot command
|
|
|
06-16-2004, 04:52 PM
|
#4
|
Moderator
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: earth
Distribution: slackware by choice, others too :} ... android.
Posts: 23,067
|
Well ... no need to be grumpy! There's xbase C++ class
libraries out there, you can always write your own tool!
Cheers,
Tink
|
|
|
03-15-2015, 11:18 AM
|
#5
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2010
Location: Nevada
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 258
Rep:
|
Quote:
Well ... no need to be grumpy! There's xbase C++ class
libraries out there, you can always write your own tool!
|
That sounds like it might be fun. So where can I find
the info on what is available as xbase C++ libraries,
and how to call them from a C or C++ program?
|
|
|
03-15-2015, 10:35 PM
|
#6
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: SE Tennessee, USA
Distribution: Gentoo, LFS
Posts: 10,970
|
Yes, there have been a few good xBase clones ... such as Harbour Project or xHarbour. (See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XBase.)
However, for the most part, xBase variants died-off because their command-line / ASCII-terminal oriented approach to things simply became outdated. They were all architected at a time ... a time which I very well remember ... when having 640K on a machine meant that it was "big." (Actually, dBase was designed when 64K was the architectural limit, and most machines, as I also remember, had less than half that much.)
When it actually became possible to assume that a system (a) had a graphical user-interface, and (b) had at least a few megabytes of RAM that was all "equally accessible without segment-register hell," the infrastructure of database development environments became much more sophisticated ... e.g. Paradox for Windows, Microsoft Access ...
... and the days of building entire interfaces using IF/THEN/ELSE statements became ... "thankfully, obsolete."
We no longer had to "start with nothing, assume nothing, therefore build everything." All of which things had once been "absolutely necessary."
Last edited by sundialsvcs; 03-15-2015 at 10:36 PM.
|
|
|
03-16-2015, 12:53 PM
|
#7
|
LQ Veteran
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: London
Distribution: PCLinuxOS, Salix
Posts: 6,191
|
I too miss that sort of program, like dBase and the QL's Archive and dBas. I found them simpler than OpenOffice Base.
|
|
|
03-16-2015, 07:27 PM
|
#8
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: SE Tennessee, USA
Distribution: Gentoo, LFS
Posts: 10,970
|
Well, yes and no ...
"Of those to whom less was given (or remotely [in-our-wildest dreams-at the-time] possible), less was required ..."
Last edited by sundialsvcs; 03-16-2015 at 07:28 PM.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:06 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|