Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
While I understand that there are many "real" DBMS available for Linux, I was wondering why any of the Ashton-Tate's dBase equivalents (or clones) for Linux are not popular? [These include dbMAN, Flagship, and Max.]
The ease of ease of use in dBase and FoxBase (later FoxPro)'s dot command was remarkable. Endusers like me, learnt basic commands like CREAte, APPEnd, DELEte, SORT, INDEx, DISPlay, etc. to manage data in multiple files.
Would like to know if there is actually a *good* dBase clone for Linux? I am especially intrested in dot commands, and (sadly!) not looking for SQL-only databases.
Well ... no need to be grumpy! There's xbase C++ class
libraries out there, you can always write your own tool!
That sounds like it might be fun. So where can I find
the info on what is available as xbase C++ libraries,
and how to call them from a C or C++ program?
However, for the most part, xBase variants died-off because their command-line / ASCII-terminal oriented approach to things simply became outdated. They were all architected at a time ... a time which I very well remember ... when having 640K on a machine meant that it was "big." (Actually, dBase was designed when 64K was the architectural limit, and most machines, as I also remember, had less than half that much.)
When it actually became possible to assume that a system (a) had a graphical user-interface, and (b) had at least a few megabytes of RAM that was all "equally accessible without segment-register hell," the infrastructure of database development environments became much more sophisticated ... e.g. Paradox for Windows, Microsoft Access ...
... and the days of building entire interfaces using IF/THEN/ELSE statements became ... "thankfully, obsolete."
We no longer hadto "start with nothing, assume nothing, therefore build everything." All of which things had once been "absolutely necessary."
Last edited by sundialsvcs; 03-15-2015 at 09:36 PM.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.