Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
/dev/hda:
setting 32-bit IO_support flag to 1
setting using_dma to 1 (on)
HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Operation not permitted
IO_support = 1 (32-bit)
using_dma = 0 (off)
root@darkstar:/home/h1tman#
What are the results of
hdparm -v -i /dev/hda
Does your hard drive show any dma modes available? I see that you are root, however, did you
su - root
and pick up all roots environment or did you
su
and keep all h1tman's environment?
You already have max performance. udma5 is the fastest that your HD can run. For grins, what are the test numbers with
hdparm -t /dev/hda
I am guess that slackware has a little more smarts built in and tells you it ins't going to allow DMA on unless you turn UDMA off (or Redhat just ignores that weird setting?). I am by no means an expert on hdparm, but that is my guess.
SuSE, Debian, Libranet, Alt will all run much faster on older machines. All run well, including X, on anything from a 486DX2 w/64MB edo ram or better. You can peak and tweak Red Hat until the cows come home(and may have to) to get close to acceptable performance. Even then, I believe the above distros will outperform Red Hat out of the box. None of the above are among my favorites(running Mandy9.1 on XP2300)but I have set them up for friends and neighbors and was quite impressed with their speed. Not promoting these distros to the detriment of Red Hat, but you might want to keep them in mind if you can't get Red Hat to where you want it.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.