Which linux is best when its come to memory usage?
Linux - ServerThis forum is for the discussion of Linux Software used in a server related context.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Do you mean which distribution would use the least amount of memory? Go for something lean like Slackware, Vector, or Arch; and couple that with a lightweight window manager like XFCE or even Fluxbox.
I doubt if there is any big difference in memory usage between distributions. What makes a difference in memory usage is:
- Running services: disable all services you do not need.
- Tuning services for memory usage: Apache and MySQL can use large amounts of memory, or very little, depending on how they are configured.
OP, make sure you get Ubuntu Server Edition. Disabling the GUI on the regular one may be more trouble than it's worth.
Quote:
Originally Posted by paulsm4
And don't forget to set your default runlevel to "3" instead of "5"
Tragically, Ubuntu has rather done away with that concept. I remember when they even still had init/telinit, 3-5 were all X. I'm all for using the distro you want, but if you liked Windows so bad, why not run that? :/
Karamarisan is correct: Ubuntu has "altered" the way runlevels work.
Even if you go with Ubuntu, you still want to configure the "moral equivalent of runlevel 3" - which is *not* available with an OOTB Ubuntu Workstation install.
Gives you a nice ncurses interface to enable or disable services from your current runlevel. Now your computer will boot, enabling only the services you want it to. If you want to start X and any other services you disabled you can just do:
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.