Linux - ServerThis forum is for the discussion of Linux Software used in a server related context.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I recently acquired a SAMSUNG T7 ssd drive for my local home network (1 user). I am going to use it for common storage, such as sharing files between devices, and maybe even doing some backing up. I am not sure if this is a good idea, but are ssds, and in particular this one, good for this type of task? I am most concerned about the life span of it. Any recommendations on my setup, or advice?
I would think the latency inherent in the network would probably significantly negate the speed advantage of an SSD over standard hard drive. You're only as fast as your slowest link in the chain and that will be your network speed. Of course, your writes to and reads from the SSD will be much faster but the data still has to go over your network and that remains the same. You may be disappointed in the speed increase.
As far as lifespan of the drive, that will depend on a lot of things and you're likely to get a variety of opinions. Personally, unless you are doing an inordinate amount of writes to the drive, I feel that the firmware technology for SSDs has matured to the point that an SSD is likely to meet or exceed the lifespan of a mechanical hard drive in most typical home computing scenarios. You may want to "over provision" the drive by partitioning the drive with 10% unallocated as this used to be recommended. The SSD firmware can use the unallocated space to replace bad blocks on the drive due to excessive writes to the block. Over provisioning of an SSD was said to increase its lifespan. However, these days, I believe most SSDs have significant over provisioning built in and you can partition and format the entire drive. You may want to check with Samsung and see what they recommend re over provisioning.
I have 3 external drives connected to my main desktop/NFS server. Two are magnetic spinning drives, one is a newer SSD drive, connected through a Thunderbolt port. I see no real difference in them other than that it takes a few seconds for the magnetic drives to spin up if they've been idle. The SSD is always ready. If used primarily as a storage device with fewer writes and deletions than on a usual desktop drive, I don't think longevity would be a problem at all. Accessing the drive doesn't cause any wear, it's only rewriting individual cells, and that's not likely to be a big issue. The SSD drive should do fine.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.