Quote:
Originally Posted by holst
You mean to mount with rsize=1400 if my MTU is 1500? Isn't that something that will give very poor performance? I tried it just now and the performance went down from 25-30 mb/s to 15-20 mb/s.
I will see in a few hours if it now is stable or not. I would actually like to have both performance and stability (of course!).
/Henrik Holst
|
The errors are continuing to show up. Rsync stops and dmesg on the client which is copying from NFS server A to NFS server B shows:
Code:
nfs: server fs-6000.domain.org not responding, timed out
nfs: server fs-6000.domain.org not responding, timed out
Nothing shows up in the system log on the NFS servers.
When I look at the two NFS servers I see that they are not 100% loaded all the time (they are idle almost 100% a few seconds now and then.)
Also, the network utilization graph is not so funny
Code:
################################################################################
RX MiB
23.41 ...***................******........................**..****
19.51 **.*****.........***.************..........**..***..********
15.61 ********.........***.************..........*****************
11.71 ********.........*****************.........*****************
7.80 ********.........*****************.........*****************
3.90 ********:*:*:.::******************:***::*:****************** [-0.46%]
1 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 s
TX MiB
31.37 .*....*..........*.*............................*...........
26.14 .**...**...*.....***................**..*...*.*****.........
20.91 ***...**...*.....****.......***.**.***..*...*.*****.........
15.68 ***...**.*.*...*.****.......**********..*..********.........
10.46 ***..*******..********.....**************..********.........
5.23 *************:***************************::***************** [-0.46%]
1 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 s
################################################################################