Linux - Server This forum is for the discussion of Linux Software used in a server related context. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
11-07-2007, 02:27 PM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: May 2007
Posts: 114
Rep:
|
MS Exchange Versus Open Source Options
We've currently got our email through a POP3 provider who has dropped the ball one too many times. Now we're looking for an in house email solution.
I've got some experience with Exchange, so that's still an option, but I'd like to get some opinions on Linux based technologies that will run on RHEL 4.
The solution should provide the following:
Support outlook as a client, support calendaring, email forwarding, auto response (out of office) and be easy to administer.
Ideally, I'd like suggestions on antispam, antivirus, and webmail solutions as well. These should be programs that can reside on a separate machine from the mail server.
I've checked Scalix, Qmail, and Postfix (with Dovecot, Spamassasin, ClamAV, and Squirrelmail). Can I get some opinions on these?
Thanks in advance...
|
|
|
11-08-2007, 07:55 AM
|
#2
|
Moderator
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,417
|
if you want to say "the linux version of exchange is XXXXX" then that's probably zimbra.
|
|
|
11-09-2007, 10:46 AM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: May 2007
Posts: 114
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Well, it appears that Zimbra's been bought by Yahoo, and only the "Network Professional" version supports outlook as a client, so that's a bust. But thanks for the input...
|
|
|
11-09-2007, 11:07 AM
|
#4
|
Member
Registered: May 2007
Posts: 114
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Can I get an opinion on Scalix?
|
|
|
11-09-2007, 11:44 AM
|
#5
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Northeast Ohio
Distribution: linuxdebian
Posts: 7,249
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ddenton
Well, it appears that Zimbra's been bought by Yahoo, and only the "Network Professional" version supports outlook as a client, so that's a bust. But thanks for the input...
|
That support is for Calendaring and shared address lists, not simple send/receive email - I'm sure you already knew that but I wanted to re-affirm just in case.
Zimbras purchase price is still far less expensive than licensing for Microsoft exchange..
even better yet have you considered an apple OSX server for your mail ?
One flat price, no additional per user licensing.
http://www.apple.com/server/macosx/features/mail.html
http://www.apple.com/server/macosx/features/ical.html
I currently run Postfix, Courier-imap, spamassassin, amavisd, clamAV on my in house mail server, it just runs and runs.
I don't support calendaring or other features on the mail server it's strictly e-mail. Clients use either Outlook or Thunderbird.
I have no complaints this thing never goes down, more than I can say for my counterparts that all run Exchange.. nothing like a corrupt exchange mail-store to ruin your weekend..
Last edited by farslayer; 11-09-2007 at 01:48 PM.
|
|
|
11-09-2007, 12:38 PM
|
#7
|
Member
Registered: May 2007
Posts: 114
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Wait... I see your reply wasn't in regard to scalix. Sorry for the confusion.
So your meaning was that Zimbra's Network Professional version was only for calendaring? I guess I'm still a little confused.
|
|
|
11-09-2007, 02:44 PM
|
#8
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Northeast Ohio
Distribution: linuxdebian
Posts: 7,249
Rep:
|
Zimbra and Scalix both do what Exchange does. in order to get the Outlook connector piece that allows you to use the scheduling features in Outlook you need to use the PAID version of these products, as that functionality is not available in the free versions.
If you don't care about the shared calendars and such and just plan to use the server for POP3 and IMAP connections the free versions of Zimbra or Scalix will fill your needs just fine. The ajax web client in Zimbra is absolutely amazing (I suggest you check out the demo on the Zimbra website if you have not already done so.. after that you may no longer have a need for outlook) If you do decide to go with the Paid versions of Zimbra or Scalix I think you will find they cost far less than the CAL's necessary to implement an exchange solution.
50 User Zimbra = $1500.00/yr
Or Open Source version FREE
Exchange 2007 5 User = $1300.00
45 additional Exchange 2007 Cals would be $3726.00
Server 2003 64 Bit = $800.00
45 user CALS for 2003 Server = 1500.00
total $7,326.00
Server Hardware for Zimbra or Exchange Solution starting at $4250.00
Quote:
PowerEdge 1950:
2 x Dual Core Intel® Xeon® 5130, 4MB Cache, 2.00GHz, 1333MHZ FSB
2GB 667MHz (4x512MB), Single Ranked DIMMs
Windows Server® 2003 R2, Standard Edition with SP2, Includes 5 CALs
25-pack of Windows® Server 2003 User CALs (Standard or Enterprise)
1x4 Backplane for 2.5-inch Hard Drives
PERC 5/i, Integrated Controller Card
Integrated SAS/SATA RAID 5, PERC 5/i Integrated
3 x 73GB 10K RPM Serial-Attach SCSI 3Gbps 2.5-in HotPlug Hard Drive
Riser with 2 PCIe Slots
Rack Chassis w/Sliding Rapid/Versa Rails and Cable Management Arm,Universal
Non-Redundant Power Supply
Rack Bezel RBEZEL
Dual Embedded Broadcom® NetXtreme II 5708 Gigabit Ethernet NIC
24X IDE CD-ROM
|
MS Exchange 2007 REQUIRES a 64 BIT OS so Exchange can access more than 4 GB of RAM..so apparently putting more than 4GB of RAM in the mail server would be appropriate I guesses for exchange 2007.... so actually your hardware cost will be higher for Exchange than what I have listed..
Regardless of the costs for ANY of the other solutions (including PAID versions of Zimbra or Scalix) they will come out far less than the cost of the Exchange solution.
the Apple Server solution gets you the Hardware and Server software installed and pre-configured (for the most part) with support options available, for what you would pay for just the hardware for any of the other solutions (including the open source solutions).. Wish I had thought of that when I replaced my mail server earlier this year
Apple OSX Server Unlimited users $5,594.00
Quote:
Apple Xserve CONFIGURED Specifications
* Two 2.0GHz Dual-Core Intel Xeon
* 2GB (4x512MB)
* Xserve RAID Card
* 73GB SAS ADM @ 15,000-rpm
* 73GB SAS ADM @ 15,000-rpm
* 73GB SAS ADM @ 15,000-rpm
* 24x Combo (DVD-ROM/CD-RW)
* ATI Radeon X1300 64MB SDRAM with VGA Adapter
* None (with PCI Express riser)
* None (with PCI Express riser)
* Single 650W Power Supply
* Rack Mounting Kit - Square Hole Rack
|
given the opportunity to do all this over again I wish I had chosen the Apple solution..
Last edited by farslayer; 11-09-2007 at 02:56 PM.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:20 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|