Mimedefang clamav vs clamav-milter
I'm looking at options and am curious what is faster..
Calling clamd from MIMEdefang,
or
Calling the clamav-milter from sendmail..
I am also calling mimedefang sendmail while mimedefang process's spamassasin..
Are there any downfalls to running the clam-milter vs clamd?
My sendmail config would be:
INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`mimedefang', `S=unix:/var/spool/MIMEDefang/mimedefang.sock, F=T, T=S:3m;R:3m')dnl
INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`clamav', `S=local:/var/run/clamav/clamav-milter.ctl, F=, T=S:4m;R:4m')dnl
define(`confINPUT_MAIL_FILTERS', `clamav')dnl
.....
I understand that this will process the MIMEDefang and spamassasin first and then clamav would process for virus's..
Discuss and tell me if I understand this properly..
|