LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Server
User Name
Password
Linux - Server This forum is for the discussion of Linux Software used in a server related context.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 12-14-2008, 07:36 PM   #1
javaholic
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2007
Posts: 25

Rep: Reputation: 15
mdadm forced resyncing to activate spare drive


oh okay so previous to my other threads about my raid5. I have managed to get the following output from cat "/proc/mdstat"

Code:
Personalities : [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
md0 : active(auto-read-only) raid5 sda1[0] sdd1[4](S) sdc1[2] sdb1[1]
      2930279808 blocks level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [4/3] [UUU_]

unused devices: <none>
How would you go about making sure that sdd1 (FD FS code autodetect linux raid) is resynced and added right?

A similar sata card can be found here(similar model but without link status LEDs but uses same Sil31114 chip):

sil3114




I think it is likely that my software fakeraid card doesn't support greater than 2TB configurations. As when i try to set it up in its software set up i get a proposed size of 748GB instead of the 2748GB it should be. what do you think. Is this the likely answer to my problems scoping many months of reading of what i can find on mdadm.

Last edited by javaholic; 12-14-2008 at 09:26 PM. Reason: card link
 
Old 12-15-2008, 07:01 AM   #2
fmua
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2007
Distribution: SLES 8 SLES9
Posts: 2

Rep: Reputation: 0
Hello

I did it at the following way

mdadm /dev/md0 -f /dev/sdc1 disk to faulty
mdadfm /dev/md0 -r /dev/sdc1 hot removed /dev/sdc1
mdadm /dev/md0 -a /dev/sdc1 Platte wieder in den Raidverbund eingetragen oder neu erkannte Platte

mdadm -D /dev/md0
Shows the contens of the mirror
 
Old 12-15-2008, 07:12 AM   #3
javaholic
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2007
Posts: 25

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
so i haven't given up on getting all 4 drives working as they should but i guessed i should try a less complex setup including only three of the drives so i did:

Code:
mdadm -Cv /dev/md0 -n3 -l5 /dev/sda1 /dev/sdb1 /dev/sdc1
i then re jigged the fakeraid setup via a reboot to represent the changes made after that i changed the mdadm.conf though not necessary and then did an assemble using:

Code:
mdadm --Assemble -verbose /dev/md0 /dev/sda1 /dev/sdb1 /dev/sdc1
But i still get the following as a result of cat /proc/mdstat

Code:
Personalities : [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
md0 : active(auto-read-only) raid5 sdc1[3](S) sdb1[1] sda1[0]
      1953519872 blocks level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [3/2] [UU_]

unused devices: <none>
With a spare listed again which still doesn't help my setup.
 
Old 12-15-2008, 07:24 AM   #4
javaholic
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2007
Posts: 25

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
I wrote up the previous at or around the same time as previous post.

oh okay so i did that

and after checking cat/ proc/mdstat after a few minutes gave me:
Code:
Personalities : [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
md0 : active raid5 sdc1[3](S) sdb1[4](F) sda1[0]
      1953519872 blocks level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [3/1] [U__]

unused devices: <none>
One failed drive and one spare.

I have been fighting with mdadm for months now.

The detail description shows this(mdadm --detail /dev/md0):

Code:
/dev/md0:
        Version : 00.90
  Creation Time : Mon Dec 15 10:50:54 2008
     Raid Level : raid5
     Array Size : 1953519872 (1863.02 GiB 2000.40 GB)
  Used Dev Size : 976759936 (931.51 GiB 1000.20 GB)
   Raid Devices : 3
  Total Devices : 3
Preferred Minor : 0
    Persistence : Superblock is persistent

    Update Time : Mon Dec 15 12:13:21 2008
          State : clean, degraded
 Active Devices : 1
Working Devices : 2
 Failed Devices : 1
  Spare Devices : 1

         Layout : left-symmetric
     Chunk Size : 64K

           UUID : 5224c5ea:00a41204:7b403d38:22f8ac8c (local to host bible)
         Events : 0.8

    Number   Major   Minor   RaidDevice State
       0       8        1        0      active sync   /dev/sda1
       1       0        0        1      removed
       2       0        0        2      removed

       3       8       33        -      spare   /dev/sdc1
       4       8       17        -      faulty spare   /dev/sdb1
The install of Debian that this is running under is is almost completely clean. All changes that have been made is removing the default apache settings(apache2-default triggered home page)

Last edited by javaholic; 12-15-2008 at 07:27 AM. Reason: additional details
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
mdadm RAID 5 single drive failure atarghe1 Linux - Server 7 12-14-2012 07:20 PM
[Fedora 9]mdadm + faulty spare setkos Linux - Newbie 0 10-30-2008 10:17 AM
RAID 5 with mdadm "spare" and "active sync" confusion ufmale Linux - Server 1 12-08-2007 11:31 AM
Add a spare SCSI hard drive twk Linux - Hardware 2 01-04-2007 03:01 PM
Partitioning a drive for spare free space...SuSE 9.0 Thaidog Linux - Newbie 1 08-16-2004 11:30 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Server

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:56 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration