Linux - ServerThis forum is for the discussion of Linux Software used in a server related context.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I am looking for a mail server solution. I am currently using iMail in a Win2003 environment. We were looking to switch to @Mail, but those jokers do not seem to want our business. The sad part is we already had a working relationship with them in another server we were managing. Anyway this is what I am doing on my current server.
Approx 10000 users accounts (possibly going you to 27000 users shortly)
Approx 2500 domains
Our needs are:
Scalability (the number of domains and users can change greatly)
Need a user friendly, customizable web interface for the end users-- also like a web interface for administration but end users interface is more important.
Runs in a Linux environment
Need GREAT Enterprise support. Easy to contact, fast to respond.
If anyone has any suggestions we would appreciate it. I have been working with the people at @Mail for over a month and they do not seem to want our continued business, as they will not get things done when they promise and then will not return emails or phone calls.
Zimbra is probably the biggest name at the moment. If you want mail, you could also go to something like Postfix with an IMAP server (Dovecot, Cyrus, etc.) and setup Squirrelmail as a Web GUI - I know a University that does this for 15,000+ users.
Sun also makes the Java Messaging System - not free, but seems to have very widespread use in Unix shops, and is definitely scalable for enterprise use.
Sun also makes the Java Messaging System - not free, but seems to have very widespread use in Unix shops, and is definitely scalable for enterprise use.
Yeah, I would have suggested the same but he mentioned "Enterprise Support" and not just use. Zimbra from my experience has pretty good support.
Thanks for the advice. I looked at Zimbra's web site and it looks promising. The support is very important--I like free $, and on many things I can spend time searching for a fix when a problem arises. But with the email if a problem were to arise I need a fix ASAP and it is worth some cost to have the support available. I still prefer the system to be free (as in open not $) but that is not even a major priority as long as the support is there. If anyone has any others I should look at let me know. We had planned to use @Mail, but since things do not seem to be working out with that we are in a shopping phase.
Does exchange run on any linux platform? No? Geez that's really surprising. I would think such an awesome MTA as exchange would open their code up and port it to every OS on the planet!
And the OP asked about quick support. Have you ever received quick support from microsoft? I didn't think so.
Peace,
JimBass
Last edited by JimBass; 01-24-2008 at 11:34 PM.
Reason: typo
As you'll probably find, most people who post here aren't looking for Microsoft solutions... given that it's a Linux board.
All anti-M$ sentiment aside, if all you want is email, Exchange is horrible overkill. I've consulted for a number of companies that had Exchange running just because "that's what we use with Outlook". Or, even worse (rolls eyes) because they had *TWO* people who wanted email on their Blackberries, so they bought Blackberry Enterprise Server to use with Exchange.
Even if you want full calendaring, etc. that Exchange provides, there are still ways to do it that are very robust and Linux-/Unix-based.
A few reasons not Exchange--
My experience with MS Exchange (which admittedly has mainly been end user) is that it is most suited for internal office mail server. I am needing a server for approx 10,000 on 2,500 domains with users spread all over the US. From my knowledge Exchange is not capable of that and if it is I do not think it is the best solution.
Currently we are only using 2 Windows servers--one being the iMail server, the other being a web server for users who insist on using Front Page. We prefer Linux servers by far. We are at a time that in the near future we will need to replace the server that iMail is running on--both physical hardware and the server software. So while we are at this point we are wanting to switch to a Linux solution.
I would like the mailserver to be open source software. It can still be commercial, I just would like the functionality and freedom that OSS provides. Although as stated before, that is not on the top of my priority list for the mail server.
In that case, my vote would definitely be for Postfix. You could also look into Cyrus IMAP, and I think there are a few others that are proven to scale well.
I recently went about looking for a mail server to run on Solaris, I spent a few weeks investigating before I decided to just use a port of Postfix. But believe it or not, when I was investigating, I found Wikipedia to be a good place to start - they have a page that lists pretty much every mailserver known, and what OS it runs on. I didn't trust any more of the information, but the list had links to individual project pages.
In that case, my vote would definitely be for Postfix. You could also look into Cyrus IMAP, and I think there are a few others that are proven to scale well.
Yep, if you want mail then Postfix (SMTP) + Cyrus (IMAP, POP, SIEVE) are the best, and probably best supported, choices. And commercial support for both is available from various parties.
Cyrus scales up and up and up, simply amazing performance.
As you'll probably find, most people who post here aren't looking for Microsoft solutions... given that it's a Linux board.
All anti-M$ sentiment aside, if all you want is email, Exchange is horrible overkill. I've consulted for a number of companies that had Exchange running just because "that's what we use with Outlook". Or, even worse (rolls eyes) because they had *TWO* people who wanted email on their Blackberries, so they bought Blackberry Enterprise Server to use with Exchange.
Even if you want full calendaring, etc. that Exchange provides, there are still ways to do it that are very robust and Linux-/Unix-based.
At a previous employer, our CEO wanted Exchange only cause he could then share his calendar. Even though we offered several open source solutions. They started out with 50 licenses for execs and managers. This then turned into wanting to migrate the whole company to Exchange. So to get calendar sharing, it cost the company literally thousands of dollars. The CEO even questioned the cost of it cause he was just technologically stupid and didn't understand anything anyways but yeah, most Execs suck with their reasonings, I'm still baffled how they get to to the top. I guess shit does float as some would say.
Zimbra uses Postfix on the back end if you were wondering.. and spamassassin, and a few other pieces.
It's basically the same setup I do manually with a really awesome webmail frontend and shared calendaring. now that the latest version of Zimbra supports Debian Etch, I plan to switch my mail server over to Zimbra.
Quote:
When you run the install script, the Zimbra install verifies that the correct prerequisite packages are available to be installed.
•Zimbra Core installs the libraries, utilities, and monitoring tools.
•Zimbra LDAP installs the OpenLDAP software, which provides open source LDAP directory services.
•Zimbra MTA installs the Postfix open source MTA, the Clam AntiVirus antivirus engine, the SpamAssassin junk mail filter, and the Amavisd-New content filter.
•Zimbra Store installs the mailbox server, including Jetty, the servlet container for the Zimbra server.
•Zimbra Spell installs the Aspell open source spelling checker. When Zimbra spell is installed, Zimbra-Apache is also installed.
•Zimbra SNMP installs the SNMP package for monitoring. This package is optional.
•Zimbra Logger installs tools for syslog aggregation, reporting, and message tracing. If you do not install Logger, you cannot use the message trace feature, the server statistics are not captures, and the server statistics section of the administration console does not display.
•Zimbra Proxy installs the proxy feature. Using an IMAP/POP proxy server allows mail retrieval for a domain to be split across multiple Zimbra servers on a per user basis.
Zimbra can support your treo and blackberry and iphone users (commercial version only)
I have too many friends that have suffered through the corrupt mailstores and other issues with Exchange, that given the choice I don't think I ever want to run exchange myself.
I have too many friends that have suffered through the corrupt mailstores and other issues with Exchange, that given the choice I don't think I ever want to run exchange myself.
Exchange is a bitch. I hated backing it up with Netbackup. I never had to administer it myself directly as that would be the Windows guys. My two previous employers, I can't count the times it went down and email was unavailable. It went down more often than a 5 dollar hooker most days..
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.