LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Server
User Name
Password
Linux - Server This forum is for the discussion of Linux Software used in a server related context.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 08-19-2012, 08:12 AM   #1
georgecyriac989
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2012
Posts: 4

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Linux server - Which distro?


I have a linux website which I am planning to move to a dedicated virtual hosting. I am wondering about the linux distro. to use? Should I try ubuntu or fedora. Please comment.
 
Old 08-19-2012, 09:05 AM   #2
theNbomr
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Distribution: OpenSuse, Fedora, Redhat, Debian
Posts: 5,399
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 908Reputation: 908Reputation: 908Reputation: 908Reputation: 908Reputation: 908Reputation: 908Reputation: 908
For servers, you probably want an emphasis on reliability, and long term support. For that, I don't think anything beats RHEL. It is all very well tested (so older), and interoperability is strong. For server-oriented hosts, I would (do) use RH every time (and probably only for servers).

--- rod.
 
Old 08-19-2012, 09:42 AM   #3
wpeckham
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Apr 2010
Location: Continental USA
Distribution: Debian, Ubuntu, RedHat, DSL, Puppy, CentOS, Knoppix, Mint-DE, Sparky, VSIDO, tinycore, Q4OS,Manjaro
Posts: 5,617

Rep: Reputation: 2695Reputation: 2695Reputation: 2695Reputation: 2695Reputation: 2695Reputation: 2695Reputation: 2695Reputation: 2695Reputation: 2695Reputation: 2695Reputation: 2695
It depends

What do you use for everything else? What have you used in the past?
If I am placing a business critical web server, and consider it at-risk, I want RHEL for support. I also want contracts in place for the hardware, redundant power, network backups with point-in-time recovery, and IDS.
If it is not for production, I can choose to go with a lot less protection. CentOS might be an option if I do not require OS support.

I support many web servers that act ONLY as a restricted portal into a secured database server. For these the OS is really not important. Everything critical on the web server can be backed up by backing up some settings and configuration files, and with that I can recreated, clone, or replace the web server within minutes on any unix like OS. For these I do not run RHEL or pay support costs.

You have to evaluate the functions, features, value, and risk to make those decisions, and it is a question that a technologist alone cannot answer. This is, in part, a business decision. I do not think that you could provide enough information here to allow any of us to decide for you, nor would it be a wise thing to do if you could.
 
Old 08-19-2012, 10:02 AM   #4
jefro
Moderator
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Posts: 21,978

Rep: Reputation: 3624Reputation: 3624Reputation: 3624Reputation: 3624Reputation: 3624Reputation: 3624Reputation: 3624Reputation: 3624Reputation: 3624Reputation: 3624Reputation: 3624
I'd use a server grade OS instead of a user type. Suse or Opensuse or the RH or clones of. Gentoo may be a stable choice too.

I am making a huge assumption that you are on some linux OS now.
 
Old 08-21-2012, 10:07 AM   #5
mtlhd
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2007
Location: Florida
Distribution: Raspbian, Debian, CentOS, Ubuntu
Posts: 131

Rep: Reputation: 18
WE could go round and round talking about what is better, blah blah, but I did want to chime in on this one because of my experiences. I primarily use Linux for Web servers.

Debian has been my go to OS for servers since 2009.
I have run Fedora, Ubuntu, and CentOS (I did like CentOS, though) but for ease of use, stability, and the amazing amount of packages availble to you, Debian is the answer for me.

Just my 2 cents.
 
Old 08-21-2012, 05:04 PM   #6
NyteOwl
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2008
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Distribution: Slackware, OpenBSD, others periodically
Posts: 512

Rep: Reputation: 139Reputation: 139
We've used Slackware, Debian and CentOS for production servers. All have been stable and reliable. Much of a server's stability once the OS is installed is up to the admin.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Linux Server Distro Deathkarr Linux - Newbie 16 07-07-2010 10:56 PM
Best Distro Of Linux to use as a server [I.R.A]_FBi Linux - Server 12 02-04-2010 09:55 PM
Best Linux Distro for Server...... rodneyaltam2004 Linux - Newbie 1 01-15-2008 08:49 PM
Linux Server Distro enzoslashslash Linux - Distributions 5 08-10-2006 01:46 AM
Is FreeBSD a server distro or a desktop distro with good server capatabilities? matthew5 *BSD 16 06-06-2006 03:11 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Server

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:43 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration