Linux - ServerThis forum is for the discussion of Linux Software used in a server related context.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I have a linux website which I am planning to move to a dedicated virtual hosting. I am wondering about the linux distro. to use? Should I try ubuntu or fedora. Please comment.
For servers, you probably want an emphasis on reliability, and long term support. For that, I don't think anything beats RHEL. It is all very well tested (so older), and interoperability is strong. For server-oriented hosts, I would (do) use RH every time (and probably only for servers).
What do you use for everything else? What have you used in the past?
If I am placing a business critical web server, and consider it at-risk, I want RHEL for support. I also want contracts in place for the hardware, redundant power, network backups with point-in-time recovery, and IDS.
If it is not for production, I can choose to go with a lot less protection. CentOS might be an option if I do not require OS support.
I support many web servers that act ONLY as a restricted portal into a secured database server. For these the OS is really not important. Everything critical on the web server can be backed up by backing up some settings and configuration files, and with that I can recreated, clone, or replace the web server within minutes on any unix like OS. For these I do not run RHEL or pay support costs.
You have to evaluate the functions, features, value, and risk to make those decisions, and it is a question that a technologist alone cannot answer. This is, in part, a business decision. I do not think that you could provide enough information here to allow any of us to decide for you, nor would it be a wise thing to do if you could.
WE could go round and round talking about what is better, blah blah, but I did want to chime in on this one because of my experiences. I primarily use Linux for Web servers.
Debian has been my go to OS for servers since 2009.
I have run Fedora, Ubuntu, and CentOS (I did like CentOS, though) but for ease of use, stability, and the amazing amount of packages availble to you, Debian is the answer for me.
We've used Slackware, Debian and CentOS for production servers. All have been stable and reliable. Much of a server's stability once the OS is installed is up to the admin.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.