LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Server
User Name
Password
Linux - Server This forum is for the discussion of Linux Software used in a server related context.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 05-09-2016, 06:53 PM   #1
renfrow
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 3

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Is there a filesystem that keeps all blocks of file on same partition?


Is there a file system, that spans disks/partitions that keeps all the blocks of a file on the same disk/partition? I want a file system for my movies that, if it has disk problems, I can remove the problem disk, put a new one in, copy all the complete files over, and then regenerate the lost files. I'd rather trade the need for regeneration for the overhead of RAID 5+.

I store my movies by genre, scifi, fantasy, cartoons, comedy, thriller, music, musicals, etc. I'm almost tempted to use a disk per genre (or more) and use a joining filesystem, but, I don't want to limit the size for any genre to any particular disk. Plus I want a single path for the ripper to output to and am unsure where files go when written from that perspective.

Thanks!
 
Old 05-10-2016, 12:12 PM   #2
Wells
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Florida, USA
Distribution: Debian, Redhat
Posts: 417

Rep: Reputation: 53
Not to my knowledge... however, there might be some options in a software RAID using mdadm that you might be able to use in order to make that happen.

Personally, I wouldn't go this route. I would stick with RAID 5 (or 6) and not deal with the loss of some of your data during a drive loss. Yes, it costs a bit more, but for me that money is well spent compared to the lost time of having to recover files that are lost.

Having just spent the last month or two ripping my DVD collection, the extra drive cost is totally worth it IMHO.
 
Old 05-10-2016, 02:53 PM   #3
renfrow
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 3

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Great, thanks! I had been thinking RAID-5 would be the way to go, but, right now money is a little tight, whereas time is somewhat available When they reverse, I'll probably go with a RAID of some kind.

Thanks!
 
Old 05-10-2016, 03:38 PM   #4
Wells
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Florida, USA
Distribution: Debian, Redhat
Posts: 417

Rep: Reputation: 53
Quote:
Originally Posted by renfrow View Post
Great, thanks! I had been thinking RAID-5 would be the way to go, but, right now money is a little tight, whereas time is somewhat available When they reverse, I'll probably go with a RAID of some kind.

Thanks!
If you are not going to immediately go the RAID route, then splitting things across multiple disks by genre is probably the way to go. Doing a span or RAID 0 across multiple disks is a great way to lose everything in one go.
 
Old 05-10-2016, 11:12 PM   #5
Doug G
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2013
Posts: 749

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
How do you plan to backup all those files? It really doesn't matter how your current filesystem is set up unless you have a correcting raid setup. Otherwise in the event of a disk failure you can simply remove the bad disk, put in a replacement, restore your backups.

Standard filesystems like ext4, ntfs, etc., do not cross partition/disk boundaries without something like lvm or raid.
 
Old 05-11-2016, 06:11 AM   #6
sundialsvcs
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: SE Tennessee, USA
Distribution: Gentoo, LFS
Posts: 10,659
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 3940Reputation: 3940Reputation: 3940Reputation: 3940Reputation: 3940Reputation: 3940Reputation: 3940Reputation: 3940Reputation: 3940Reputation: 3940Reputation: 3940
And I do suggest that you use LVM from the very outset.

Also, set up an automatic backup procedure. There are various web articles that show you how to use "good ol' rsync" to largely replicate the behavior of Apple's fabled Time Machine.
 
Old 05-11-2016, 12:50 PM   #7
Wells
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Florida, USA
Distribution: Debian, Redhat
Posts: 417

Rep: Reputation: 53
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug G View Post
How do you plan to backup all those files? It really doesn't matter how your current filesystem is set up unless you have a correcting raid setup. Otherwise in the event of a disk failure you can simply remove the bad disk, put in a replacement, restore your backups.

Standard filesystems like ext4, ntfs, etc., do not cross partition/disk boundaries without something like lvm or raid.
Well, as he said it looks like it is a bunch of movies. My guess is that he has them already on DVD, and has ripped them to files so that he can watch them via something like Plex or whatever.

If the drive holding the files dies, he just goes back and re-rips the DVD's. Hence my missive about time lost, etc.
 
Old 05-11-2016, 04:01 PM   #8
renfrow
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 3

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wells View Post
Well, as he said it looks like it is a bunch of movies. My guess is that he has them already on DVD, and has ripped them to files so that he can watch them via something like Plex or whatever.

If the drive holding the files dies, he just goes back and re-rips the DVD's. Hence my missive about time lost, etc.
Exactly this, except, don't have a lot of movies ripped, yet, still trying to decide on a ripper. And right now, time is not a premium .
 
Old 05-11-2016, 07:51 PM   #9
jefro
Moderator
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Posts: 21,978

Rep: Reputation: 3624Reputation: 3624Reputation: 3624Reputation: 3624Reputation: 3624Reputation: 3624Reputation: 3624Reputation: 3624Reputation: 3624Reputation: 3624Reputation: 3624
While you are looking, you may consider something like ZFS or BTRFS. They have some advanced features and also use overhead to do it.

What you were asking however didn't fully make a lot of sense to me.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Changing Filesystem and Kernel - Problem with Bad Blocks NandFlash lucasct Linux - Embedded & Single-board computer 0 07-25-2011 11:14 AM
Filesystem Corruption Possibly Caused By Bad Blocks kbranch Linux - General 5 11-07-2010 03:46 PM
EXT3 filesystem blocks and Sector numbers icebreaker_81 Linux - Software 1 09-08-2009 08:47 PM
Noncontiguous blocks in ext2 filesystem kwisi Red Hat 3 04-27-2005 01:42 PM
problem in getting free data blocks in filesystem udayan Programming 4 07-07-2002 01:03 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Server

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:11 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration