Linux - Server This forum is for the discussion of Linux Software used in a server related context. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
01-15-2011, 02:04 PM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: May 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Distribution: Debian, Solaris, HP-UX, AIX
Posts: 208
Rep:
|
IPv6 BIND DNS Setup Questions
Hello,
Currently I have two IPv4 DNS servers setup that are hosting ~200 different zones and we want to setup IPv6 on these systems so we can resolve both address classes. Has anyone done this? What would the best route be to setup services on these? Should I use the same host names for both IPv4 and IPv6? If I did this the IPv6 records shouldn’t be requested unless the application / system requests AAAA records? I will update with more questions as they come to me…
|
|
|
01-16-2011, 02:59 PM
|
#2
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2002
Location: Kansas City
Distribution: OpenSUSE, Fedora
Posts: 64
Rep:
|
Hello, I've run dualstack v4/v6 DNS servers for years and this should be no problem.
Quote:
What would the best route be to setup services on these?
|
Do you mean you need IPv6 access in the first place? If so, I'd recommend http://tunnelbroker.net.
Quote:
Should I use the same host names for both IPv4 and IPv6?
|
I run all my Linux servers (not just DNS) dualstack anymore, can't think of a good reason not to.
Quote:
If I did this the IPv6 records shouldn’t be requested unless the application / system requests AAAA records?
|
Running dualstack won't make any difference in this regard. DNS servers will always attempt to answer whatever they are asked. It doesn't matter which stack the query comes in on, it only matters what kind of record the client asked for and whether or not the DNS server can provide the answer. If the client asks for an A record, it'll get an A record. If it asks for an AAAA record, it'll get an AAAA reply.
Hope that helps, let me know.
Last edited by knetknight; 01-16-2011 at 03:09 PM.
|
|
|
01-16-2011, 05:28 PM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: May 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Distribution: Debian, Solaris, HP-UX, AIX
Posts: 208
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by knetknight
|
This will be hooked up to a 40Gbit backbone that is running IPv6. Tunnels will not be needed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by knetknight
Running dualstack won't make any difference in this regard. DNS servers will always attempt to answer whatever they are asked. It doesn't matter which stack the query comes in on, it only matters what kind of record the client asked for and whether or not the DNS server can provide the answer. If the client asks for an A record, it'll get an A record. If it asks for an AAAA record, it'll get an AAAA reply.
Hope that helps, let me know.
|
This does help. I was thinking that it would work that way, just wasn't 100% sure. Thanks!
|
|
|
01-16-2011, 05:42 PM
|
#4
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2002
Location: Kansas City
Distribution: OpenSUSE, Fedora
Posts: 64
Rep:
|
That is awesome that you have native IPv6 connectivity. I've been using IPv6 for years but haven't yet had a provider who offered it native so I've always had to tunnel -- I'm seriously jealous. :-) (Well, one provider did offer v6 addresses, but even they were tunneling through he.net). I seriously can't believe IPv6 isn't more mainstream already, I can hardly live without it.
A couple things (that you may already know or may not apply to you) but should be considered for full functionality:
1. Of those domains, they may want to update their glue records to reflect that their Nameservers now have IPv6 addresses.
2. Consider adding AAAA records for each zones NS records so that clients who ask for a domains NS records will see that they are IPv6 accessible.
Let me know if any questions, but for the most part it's honestly pretty straight forward.
Regards
Last edited by knetknight; 01-16-2011 at 05:44 PM.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:17 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|