LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Server
User Name
Password
Linux - Server This forum is for the discussion of Linux Software used in a server related context.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 08-21-2017, 02:07 PM   #1
RomN
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2017
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 4

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Question IBM Bladecenter H with Rocks Cluster make that sense?


Hello

I was able to buy following Stuff:

2 x IBM Bladecenter H
6 x IBM HS20
8 x IBM HS22
16 x IBM EXP5000 with a lot of Harddrives
2 x DS5100
1 x IBM Console Switch

including i think everything i will need...Cables, IBM CD's an so on...

My plan is to setup a HPC Cluster with Qemu for Virtualize one big Windows Machine to do some Renderjobs...
I think for that i only will use one Bladecenter and perhaps one EXP5000
The cluster is the right way for me because if i have one powerful computer i dont have to do a lot of updates on every blade. The software i use have a lot of big updates...
At the moment i run a Renderfarm with 15 normal Windows Computers... and that make no Sense because if there is an Update i use a half day to update every Computer...

To realise this i think i would take the solution with Rocks Cluster. It was the onliest solution which i understand at the moment. But because i have no experience in this things i wan't to know what you think about. Are there better solutions for my equipment?

But first i have to Install the Powerplugs for the Bladecenter in my House :-D
I hope its the right Topic in this Forum...
 
Old 08-22-2017, 04:10 PM   #2
RomN
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2017
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 4

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
In between my last post i found out its better to share render jobs to a lot of small machines then on one big machines. It means for me that i will setup so many virtual core machines how i have physical cores. If i doo that i would be able to setup the server not as a cluster. Does this bring me any disadvantages?
 
Old 08-23-2017, 11:09 AM   #3
RomN
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2017
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 4

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
What do you think about a open stack? Would it help me or is it not necessary for me? I have found this Methode i think i would be able to do it...and it looks to me that i would be much faster with this methode...
https://www.ubuntu.com/download/cloud/autopilot
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Beowulf Cluster with Xen on IBM bladecenter for Private Virtual Machine Farm primesoftnz Linux - Server 4 11-23-2016 11:48 AM
Does IBM BladeCenter HS21 support debian shaijuseb Linux - Hardware 5 09-09-2009 10:28 AM
ibm bladecenter locked up. possible memory problems? ncsuapex Linux - Hardware 4 06-25-2009 09:10 AM
IBM eServer BladeCenter HS21 - Suse 9 JJX SUSE / openSUSE 2 11-03-2008 11:48 AM
LXer: Rocks clusters make sense for educational environments LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 08-19-2008 04:00 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Server

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:24 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration