How to configure bind server
Hey,
first I'm very sorry for my bad english. I just install my new bind server at home for testing and learning. nslookup on the server linux machine looks good but when I tried nslookup from windows machine I got error ... I think that problem is PTR and I don't know where I wrong? Linux Machine: Code:
nslookup mydomain.loc Code:
C:\Documents and Settings\xp>nslookup mydomain.loc My configuration files named.conf : Code:
// Red Hat BIND Configuration Tool Code:
$TTL 86400 Code:
$TTL 86400 I installed caching-nameserver do I need to configure named.caching-nameserver.conf file ? The default file for named.caching-nameserver.conf : Code:
// |
Quick question,
Is your linux firewall enabling blocking DNS requests? -twantrd |
Quote:
The answer is no ..you can see for your self ( : Code:
ACCEPT udp -- anywhere anywhere state NEW udp dpt:domain |
I'm wondering, what does the output of netstat -atun show? Is it showing the named daemon listening on port 53, or just on localhost? Sometimes named will only bind to the 127.0.0.1 address unless told to bind on another IP.
Also, I'm curious: From the windows machine, instead of looking up the way you do, try doing: c:\> nslookup > server 192.168.10.31 >mydomain.loc |
Also try telnetting from Windows
>telnet 192.168.10.31 53 |
Hey ,
Code:
netstat -atun Code:
C:\Documents and Settings\xp>nslookup |
My head hurts, but please tell me where the entry for mydomain.loc is? Try a lookup on linux.mydomain.loc, I can see that one has an entry in the zone file.
|
Dns query refused
hi,
My DNS in server is respoding well but if i look in windows client it is giving error same as the above post .Please help me out . Thx |
Welcome to Linux Questions.
I am glad that the LQ search engine was helpful to you in addressing your problem. While it may seem like a good idea to help provide background information, it would be best if you would please start a new thread instead of appending to one that is several years old. This allows us to better focus on helping you without being distracted by other, older, information. If you would like to point to the information in older posts, please include a link referencing them. I would like to suggest that you use the report button on your post and ask a moderator to please move it to its own thread. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:56 PM. |