LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Server
User Name
Password
Linux - Server This forum is for the discussion of Linux Software used in a server related context.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 01-11-2012, 03:44 PM   #1
robert.wolfe
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2006
Distribution: Debian for Sparc, OpenSUSE 11.2, Solaris 9, Debian/x86, Ubuntu Server
Posts: 19

Rep: Reputation: 1
AMANDA Issue - Recording Takes Longer Than It Should


Hi all!

We are running Amanda 3.1.1 under SunOS 5.10 and it seems like the recording phase of our nightly backups is taking longer and longer on certain directories, even though no new additional data has been added to said directories. I have come up with some possible theories as to why this may be happening as well as some possible solutions (using new tapes for the set, cleaning the drive heads, etc). However, I do not think that these solutions would be acceptable to my IT manager. If anyone could shed any light on this, the help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Old 01-16-2012, 08:44 AM   #2
gmartin
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: PA
Distribution: Slackware 13.37 Linux Reg # 341245
Posts: 285

Rep: Reputation: 40
Curious as to why your manager wouldn't allow you to clean the drive heads. However, I don't believe those would cause a slow down unless the backup system is reporting errors.

Are you certain the size of the data has not changed?

Are you backing up across a network? Is the network healthy?

Is the data volume healthy? A degraded array due to a bad disk could cause this.
 
Old 01-16-2012, 09:00 AM   #3
GetLinux
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Posts: 13

Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by robert.wolfe View Post
Hi all!

We are running Amanda 3.1.1 under SunOS 5.10 and it seems like the recording phase of our nightly backups is taking longer and longer on certain directories, even though no new additional data has been added to said directories. I have come up with some possible theories as to why this may be happening as well as some possible solutions (using new tapes for the set, cleaning the drive heads, etc). However, I do not think that these solutions would be acceptable to my IT manager. If anyone could shed any light on this, the help would be greatly appreciated.

Tape backups will start all over again if there's a single bit error typically. Where I work we use VTL's virtual tape libraries which are basically large raid arrays that allow the backups to happen and they handle getting the data on tape. You should be able to see this in the logs.
 
Old 02-02-2012, 01:52 PM   #4
zpaddy
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2009
Posts: 2

Rep: Reputation: 0
Are using amgtar Amanda application to perform Amanda backups?
 
Old 02-14-2012, 07:23 AM   #5
choogendyk
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2007
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Distribution: Solaris 9 & 10, Mac OS X, Ubuntu Server
Posts: 1,197

Rep: Reputation: 105Reputation: 105
If you haven't solved this problem yet, there are a couple of angles to come at it, depending on how you answer these questions. If it is only a particular Disk List Entry (DLE) that is having troubles, then you should be looking at /var/adm/messages to see if there are scsi errors. Is it consistently the same DLE? Try doing the backup operation of that DLE from the command line and see what it shows. i.e. if you are using ufsdump in Amanda, try a ufsdump from the command line. You can pipe it to some available space through ufsrestore, or pipe it to ufsrestore to /dev/null.

If you are using ZFS, and gnutar or zfs send for backup, then try those individually from the command line.

If, on the other hand, it seems that taping generally is getting slower, then you should try running something to tape from the command line and see what you see. Most tape drives or libraries have either indicator lights or LCD displays that indicate when they think they need a cleaning tape. It is reasonable to use one every once in a while, though the frequency depends on the type of tape drive.

In any case, the general strategies with Amanda are to familiarize yourself with log files and read them when you have troubles, and then to break down the backup and see which step is causing the problem. Amanda uses native utilities on the OS, and you can do the same thing from the command line. That allows you to narrow the problem down and see exactly where it is.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
KDE takes longer and longer to load vbisis Slackware 26 10-10-2010 03:28 PM
Benchmarking a tape drive, time to copy takes forever, time to append takes longer? jeriryan Linux - Hardware 2 06-15-2008 12:15 AM
amanda: DNAT issue fedor@ Linux - Newbie 0 05-08-2007 02:19 AM
DRM Takes A Hit From the Recording Industry weibullguy General 3 12-06-2006 10:51 AM
what takes longer? system() or connect() (C/C++) Thinking Programming 6 03-03-2006 09:54 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Server

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:55 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration