Linux - Security This forum is for all security related questions.
Questions, tips, system compromises, firewalls, etc. are all included here. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
06-15-2007, 10:35 PM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2007
Posts: 36
Rep:
|
What are your VPN solutions?
What are you using for your VPN solution? I was thinking about going with OpenVPN, but there are so many options out there. I am thinking in the perspective of support, easy manageability, and scalability. I checked documentations for OpenVPN, Free S/WAN, and PoPTop. I am leaning on OpenVpn, because it will be an easy setup for remote home users. Free S/WAN for site to site connections. PoPtop looks good too, because it will an easy integration with Microsoft servers. What are your suggestions? Thanks again.
|
|
|
06-16-2007, 01:05 AM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: CT
Distribution: Debian 6+, CentOS 5+
Posts: 1,323
Rep: 
|
I use PoPToP because it is relatively easy to setup, it is geared towards computer to LAN vs LAN to LAN and it integrates easily with Windows as there is a built in client on all windows PCs. A note though I found the encryption implementation to be a bear, although this was before the PPP daemon had the encryption algorythms in it I had patch mine.
|
|
|
06-16-2007, 05:13 PM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2007
Posts: 36
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scheidel21
I use PoPToP because it is relatively easy to setup, it is geared towards computer to LAN vs LAN to LAN and it integrates easily with Windows as there is a built in client on all windows PCs. A note though I found the encryption implementation to be a bear, although this was before the PPP daemon had the encryption algorythms in it I had patch mine.
|
I am little concern about the security. Is Poptop complete new implementation of PPTP? MSpptp went through eight years of bug fixing to get to the maturity on win2003. Whole plug and play of PPTP is very desirable, but I am concern about the security.
|
|
|
06-18-2007, 07:32 PM
|
#4
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: SE Tennessee, USA
Distribution: Gentoo, LFS
Posts: 11,262
|
I've used both "racoon" (ipsec-tools) and "OpenVPN" in various attempts to connect to routers of various types. (Like a SonicWall that uses their funky password scheme.)
Well, on the one hand, one-or-the-other of them "eventually worked."
But <<FLAME ON!>> neither one "just worked."
Frankly, truth be told, in one way or another, both of them sucked. (Ahem. In fact, they were able to move air equally well inward or outward through that orifice.  And maybe the oth... umm, well, let's not go there.  )
What ... "just worked?" Uh huh. My Macintosh. I literally wound up using a different computer to arrive at a solution that I could stand. I was extremely disappointed.
Especially when "The Type Of Computer Which Must Not Be Named" proved to be equally adept at it.
|
|
|
06-19-2007, 11:23 AM
|
#5
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2006
Location: Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Distribution: RHEL 5, CentOS 5
Posts: 64
Rep:
|
I used openvpn and it was very easy to setup, configure and run. As a newbie I thought it was one of the easier things to get running on my machine. There is another VPN solution that uses IPSec but I can't remember it right now but I'll get back to you.
|
|
|
06-20-2007, 11:15 AM
|
#6
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Cambridge, MA, USA
Distribution: Ubuntu (Dapper and Heron)
Posts: 377
Rep:
|
I used OpenSwan (which grew out of Free S/WAN, IIRC) for IPsec tunnels. Linux clients connect directly to that using (another installation of) OpenSwan. To support Windows clients, we also had to support tunneling L2TP over the IPsec. This doesn't make sense security wise (IPsec is intended to be secure), but its the easiest for Windows users. Read documentation by Jacco de Leeuw and Paul Wouters (he wrote a book about it).
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:38 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|