Linux - Security This forum is for all security related questions.
Questions, tips, system compromises, firewalls, etc. are all included here. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
10-03-2004, 09:57 PM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: Lacey, WA
Distribution: SUSE 9.2
Posts: 102
Rep:
|
Virus prevention, in particular the jpg exploit
I've been reading the new jpg exploit and wondering what I can do to protect my system. Even if my machine would be affected, my guess is that its a windows only virus? so I could in theory have in infection and not know it, and thus it could transfer to the windows boxes on the netwrok via samba shares. So what can i do to protect my system from getting infected with virus, both windows and linux viruses?
and just my 2 cents, if they would stop posting these exploits there wouldnt be as many viruses to exploit them!!
|
|
|
10-03-2004, 10:07 PM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: pikes peak
Distribution: Slackware, LFS
Posts: 2,577
Rep:
|
Re: Virus prevention, in particular the jpg exploit
Quote:
Originally posted by Whiskers
So what can i do to protect my system from getting infected with virus, both windows and linux viruses?
|
Turn OFF all active scripting in windows
Quote:
if they would stop posting these exploits there wouldnt be as many viruses to exploit them!!
|
NO, if M$ would stop putting out Lousy coded programs, then there would be nothing to exploit!!
|
|
|
10-03-2004, 10:10 PM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2004
Distribution: Slackware 10, Gentoo
Posts: 292
Rep:
|
Security through obscurity does _not_ work. If people stopped posting exploits, only a smaller crowd would have them, true (mabye), but the damage would be bad, quite easily worse, for the simple fact that if the vendor doesnt know about it, they cant fix it.
|
|
|
10-04-2004, 11:12 AM
|
#4
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Sydney
Distribution: Rocky 9.2
Posts: 18,415
|
Mozilla anf Firefox have recent patches to fix this. eg Firefox is now 1.0.1
|
|
|
10-04-2004, 12:53 PM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: hopefully not here
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 2,038
Rep:
|
i don't believe the linux jpeg libs have this vulnerability do they?
|
|
|
10-04-2004, 08:09 PM
|
#6
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 9,870
|
no, linux isn't affected by this flaw...
the new firefox preview is simply that: a new firefox preview...
|
|
|
10-05-2004, 01:15 AM
|
#7
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2003
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 101
Rep:
|
I read that libjpg was updated recently for some buffer overflows so it's not just windows. Buffer Overflows are found in ALL code not just windows.
|
|
|
10-05-2004, 02:31 AM
|
#8
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 9,870
|
Quote:
Originally posted by RandomLinuxNewb
I read that libjpg was updated recently for some buffer overflows so it's not just windows. Buffer Overflows are found in ALL code not just windows.
|
you are confused with the lib png issue we had a while back... that one did affect libpng-using applications on any operating system...
but this current exploit affects only windows products... it's a bug in microsoft's Graphic Device Interface (GDI)...
Quote:
This is --not-- the fault of the JPEG standard, and the JPEG committee has --no-- responsibility for either the problem or its suggested solutions. In view of the serious nature of this problem however, we recommend that all users of Microsoft products read the above notices and take appropriate action.
|
http://www.jpeg.org/newsrel10.html
|
|
|
10-05-2004, 05:21 AM
|
#9
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 9,870
|
by the way, it looks like the firefox preview release patch was for an unrelated and non-critical issue:
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=18882
Last edited by win32sux; 10-05-2004 at 05:24 AM.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:32 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|