Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Go Back > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Security
User Name
Linux - Security This forum is for all security related questions.
Questions, tips, system compromises, firewalls, etc. are all included here.


  Search this Thread
Old 04-03-2006, 03:03 PM   #1
LQ Newbie
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: Piraeus
Distribution: Fedora Core 4 i386, Ubuntu, openSUSE 10, Debian 3.1 Sarge, Mandriva LE2005
Posts: 13

Rep: Reputation: 0
Question Suspicious Inbound/Outbound traffic

I am running a lan with the LinkSys WAG354G router as gateway and two PCs w/ Fedora Core 5.

I keep on getting the following messages in the security log of LinkSys:
2006-04-02T22:48:51+02:00 Hacker Attack TCP: From: To:
2006-04-02T22:48:53+02:00 Hacker Attack TCP: From: To:
2006-04-02T22:48:54+02:00 Hacker Attack TCP: From: To:
2006-04-02T22:57:10+02:00 Hacker Attack TCP: From: To:
2006-04-02T23:00:31+02:00 Hacker Attack TCP: From: To:
2006-04-02T23:00:32+02:00 Hacker Attack TCP: From: To:
2006-04-02T23:00:35+02:00 Hacker Attack TCP: From: To:
2006-04-02T23:02:07+02:00 Hacker Attack TCP: From: To:

Is this an attack? Why all these are targeting port 32459? BTW, I do not run any torrent client.

Second, the router reports my computer ( as sending UDP packets from sequential ports, i.e.

2006-04-02T17:06:15+02:00 UDP: From: To:
2006-04-02T17:06:20+02:00 UDP: From: To:
2006-04-02T17:06:29+02:00 UDP: From: To:
2006-04-02T17:06:40+02:00 UDP: From: To:
2006-04-02T17:06:45+02:00 UDP: From: To:
2006-04-02T17:06:54+02:00 UDP: From: To:
2006-04-02T17:07:04+02:00 UDP: From: To:
2006-04-02T17:07:06+02:00 TCP: From: To:
2006-04-02T17:08:40+02:00 TCP: From: To:
2006-04-02T17:09:40+02:00 TCP: From: To:
2006-04-02T17:10:09+02:00 TCP: From: To:
2006-04-02T17:10:10+02:00 TCP: From: To:
2006-04-02T17:10:10+02:00 TCP: From: To:
2006-04-02T17:10:10+02:00 TCP: From: To:
2006-04-02T17:10:11+02:00 TCP: From: To:
2006-04-02T17:10:12+02:00 TCP: From: To:
2006-04-02T17:10:12+02:00 TCP: From: To:

Does this means that the computer is hacked? Any suggestions where to look?
Old 04-03-2006, 03:37 PM   #2
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Windsor Ontario
Distribution: Ubuntu, Debian, Redhat
Posts: 44

Rep: Reputation: 15
Looks like uTorrent traffic for port 32459, if this helps:

Even tho you said you don't have a bittorrent client running. It looks typical of bittorrent logging..

Last edited by JakeX; 04-03-2006 at 03:49 PM.
Old 04-03-2006, 04:09 PM   #3
Registered: Sep 2002
Location: Cincinnati
Distribution: Debian GNU/Linux
Posts: 310

Rep: Reputation: 31
Post some tcpdump output with packet headers.
Old 04-03-2006, 04:32 PM   #4
LQ Guru
Registered: Jan 2003
Location: Seymour, Indiana
Distribution: Distribution: RHEL 5 with Pieces of this and that. Kernel, KDE 3.5.8 and KDE 4.0 beta, Plu
Posts: 5,700

Rep: Reputation: 62
One of the ips is to a webmail page. goto http sites.

Old 04-03-2006, 05:14 PM   #5
LQ Newbie
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: Piraeus
Distribution: Fedora Core 4 i386, Ubuntu, openSUSE 10, Debian 3.1 Sarge, Mandriva LE2005
Posts: 13

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
OK. I think I found the outbound part. Stupid me! The addresses w/ port 53 were dynamically assigned DNS servers from my ISP. So when I was asking for a web page the router was contacting the DNS for info. It seems reasonable, don't you think?

But the first part is still a mystery to me. Why I keep on getting TCP packets to a torrent port although I do not use torrent?

Last edited by dimitris.kalamaras; 04-03-2006 at 05:33 PM.
Old 04-04-2006, 09:30 AM   #6
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Out
Posts: 3,307

Rep: Reputation: 55
If you have a dynamic ip maybe you are taking the ip of a person who before you was doing bittorent with this IP. And the time that the bittorent removes you from good sources you will still receive questions from others. I don't know bittorent so I don't know the mechanism.
In this case, what I do is restart my router (and wait >5mn) so that I am assigned a new IP.
In a way, as your firewall is blocking the port (you're not saying : the port is open/closed, you're not answering anything which is not standard), the other clients will try again. You could open the port on your firewall..

For the rest of the traffic, it looks like some DNS or some webserver are longer to answer that the timeout of your firewall (good values can be 15mn for TCP,40s for UDP if you can modify them)

And these kind of logs are pretty useless because as int0x80 said you would need the complete headers which you probably can't have from the webconsole of your router.

You could also get a kernel >= 2.6.15 it has some more network security features.


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Newbie:What are inbound and outbound memory windows? halturata Programming 3 04-03-2006 02:10 PM
catch all inbound and outbound emails mitzadej Linux - Software 1 04-03-2006 11:56 AM
suspicious outbound connections di11rod Linux - Networking 13 01-23-2004 02:55 AM
Inbound/Outbound email messages full control miguel Linux - General 0 05-07-2002 11:36 AM
Force outbound reply traffic to reuse inbound non-gw NIC? Jon- Linux - Networking 2 03-05-2002 04:50 PM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:40 PM.

Main Menu
Write for LQ is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration