LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Security
User Name
Password
Linux - Security This forum is for all security related questions.
Questions, tips, system compromises, firewalls, etc. are all included here.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 01-04-2007, 12:11 AM   #1
esaym
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2006
Distribution: Lots of Debian
Posts: 165

Rep: Reputation: 32
Strange Apache log


I just had this show up in my apache log. What the heck does it mean? Not an ip address I know of..

82.96.96.3 - - [03/Jan/2007:08:19:48 -0600] "POST http://82.96.96.3:802/ HTTP/1.0" 200 2718 "-" "-"
82.96.96.3 - - [03/Jan/2007:08:19:48 -0600] "CONNECT 82.96.96.3:802 HTTP/1.0" 405 322 "-" "-"

82.96.96.3 - - [03/Jan/2007:22:08:40 -0600] "CONNECT 82.96.96.3:802 HTTP/1.0" 405 322 "-" "-"
82.96.96.3 - - [03/Jan/2007:22:08:41 -0600] "POST http://82.96.96.3:802/ HTTP/1.0" 200 2718 "-" "-"

It really sticks out from all the usual "GET" connections...
 
Old 01-04-2007, 05:05 AM   #2
gilead
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Distribution: Slackware64 14.0
Posts: 4,141

Rep: Reputation: 168Reputation: 168
It looks like some from 82.96.96.3 (a German IP address, according to ripe) was checking whether they could use your server to connect back to their own server on port 802 - the 200 code says that the POST did work. The 405 response for the CONNECT means that your server didn't allow that method to be used.

Last edited by gilead; 01-04-2007 at 02:19 PM. Reason: Fixed typo
 
Old 01-04-2007, 09:59 AM   #3
esaym
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2006
Distribution: Lots of Debian
Posts: 165

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by gilead
It looks like some from 82.96.96.3 (a German IP address, according to ripe) was checking whether they could use your server to connect back to their own server on port 802 - the 200 code says that the POST did work. The 405 response for the CONNECT means that you server didn't allow that method to be used.
hmm interesting. Thanks
 
Old 01-04-2007, 12:25 PM   #4
esaym
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2006
Distribution: Lots of Debian
Posts: 165

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 32
Ok I did some reading on that ip address and it looks like it is normal if you use irc
 
Old 01-04-2007, 09:09 PM   #5
Capt_Caveman
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Distribution: Fedora
Posts: 3,658

Rep: Reputation: 69
Interesting, I hadn't seen that before. Just to clarify for those lurking in this thread or who come across it via a google search, if you do a whois of the scanning ip (82.96.96.3), you'll see this message:
Quote:
"remarks: If you see portscans/abuse from 82.96.96.3
remarks: Please read http://freenode.net/policy.shtml#proxies"
If you follow that link, you'll see:
Quote:
Open Proxies, IIS and Appeals
Like many interactive networks, we've had our share of problems with denial-of-service attacks. As a result, we've had to develop a variety of measures to reduce the impact of such attacks. freenode may block access to users whose IRC clients run on hosts with open proxies, IIS servers or other categories of software determined to present special risk to our server environment. We reserve the right to use automation to attempt to detect such software on your host, as you connect to our servers, while you remain connected to the network and on occasion during post-connection analysis. Your use of the network signifies your acceptance.
It's still be a good idea to correlate the time the scan was received with your IRC activity, just to be on the safe side. Thanks for posting this.
 
Old 01-07-2007, 01:52 AM   #6
gloomy
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Finland
Distribution: Mainly Gentoo
Posts: 119

Rep: Reputation: 15
Thank you Capt_Caveman for your eagle eyes. As a daily user of the Freenode network, the 82.96.96.3 indeed have popped up in my webserver logs. However, I have long time ago blocked the whole Probe Networks subnet with no effect in the irc usage of that network.

I also doubt how effective such a measure can be in DoS prevention.
 
Old 01-07-2007, 10:29 AM   #7
Capt_Caveman
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Distribution: Fedora
Posts: 3,658

Rep: Reputation: 69
You can thank esaym, I was just expanding on what he posted to make it a bit more clear what was going on.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Strange things (for me) on apache log stormrider_may Linux - Security 4 02-20-2006 06:23 AM
Strange Apache log entrance dominant Linux - Security 0 09-27-2004 02:39 PM
Strange results in /var/log/apache/access.log subt13 Linux - Security 2 08-03-2004 02:21 PM
Strange thing in Apache log nerdstat Linux - Networking 3 07-19-2004 10:54 AM
strange apache access.log saturn_vk Linux - Security 1 06-13-2003 05:48 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Security

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:33 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration