Noway2 |
09-09-2010 04:16 PM |
Yes, very interesting article, it really makes you think. Thank you for sharing!
One of the first things that came to my mind was Canonical's, what I would call a religious devotion, to a 6 month development cycle. I too am an Ubuntu user and have been so since about the release of Gutsy Gibbon a few years back. Since that time there have been 6 major releases, the latest of which appears to be a significant overhaul of the core application. While I am pleased that this has brought a massive increase in hardware compatibility and the vast majority of the system "just works" I can't help but wonder if this trend isn't towards the distributions detriment.
It seems that Ubuntu could very well become the product that brings Linux to the masses, especially in regards to ease of use and ease of installation. I myself have even considered recommending it over Windows to some less than computer literate relatives, largely because of the reduced propensity for malware and viruses and with the latest release think it has reached the point of being easy enough for them to use.
This brings me to another point that the article has made me wonder. What degree does the end user play in the level of security of the OS? Because the OS makes it easier to do something stupid, does it mean that the OS is less secure? Similarly, does having a large, potentially inexperienced user base, create security vulnerabilities for other, more sophisticated users such as those running server type applications?
In the last year or so, I have noticed a dramatic increase in the amount of interest in running ones own server, especially email, file sharing, and web servers. So far there seems to be a high degree of 'tolerance' towards this both from the community and from the ISP perspective. Clearly if one is going to run a server, one has the responsibility to secure it. What is the future of this trend and what does it mean for in terms of 'security' for everyone?
|