Linux - SecurityThis forum is for all security related questions.
Questions, tips, system compromises, firewalls, etc. are all included here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
From animated logos to Web videos for hip, independent bands, HTML5 is getting buzz and gaining traction. But concerns about the security of features in the new version of the Web's lingua franca persist.
Every technology innovation has its coming out party, and Google Inc.'s recent "dancing balls" logo experiment was widely interpreted as a high-impact debut for the next version of HTML, dubbed HTML5. But web security experts are warning that the sprawling new Web standard may favor functionality over security, enabling a new generation of powerful Web based attacks.
Could.. Might.. May..I'm no web-dev, nor am I a hacker, to me this sounds like more of the same "clucking" we got from experts as we were approaching the year 2k.
Haha, could be. But wasn't the Y2K panic sort of a media-driven frenzy? Or were there really subject matter experts expressing their concern over it like in this case? It's an honest question, as I can't really remember the pre-Y2K situation.
Haha, could be. But wasn't the Y2K panic sort of a media-driven frenzy? Or were there really subject matter experts expressing their concern over it like in this case? It's an honest question, as I can't really remember the pre-Y2K situation.
That is the one thing that sticks in my mind. Experts of all sorts on the news and, gracing various panels. They mostly talked about the 'chaos' that could/might descend upon us. I cannot recall one so called expert saying, something may happen but life will continue as normal.
As for the media's part. The media doesn't know its Bits from its Bytes. If it smells like something that can spread panic, they are on it like 'White on rice'...
I'm not saying that the security concerns expressed over HTML5 are not real I don't know. At least validate your claims with proof!
Last edited by {BBI}Nexus{BBI}; 09-18-2010 at 03:52 PM.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.