Linux - SecurityThis forum is for all security related questions.
Questions, tips, system compromises, firewalls, etc. are all included here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
This thread has seen enough non-answers to last the OP a lifetime. One is OK, two is a bit much and three certainly is overkill. Anyone thinking of wedging in another one: just don't.
phyiscal access to the box - key for any item since it changes how other things can/need to be addressed
I don't think that's a really good answer, only because any machine is always going to have to be physically accessible. That's also not specific to Linux...that's ANY machine. Someone will also eventually state that the network connection could be a key issue. <sigh>
Now in defense of my answer (browser vulnerabilities), one can certainly say that that isn't specific to Linux...until one factors in that there's a Linux version of FF (along with other browsers [Chrome, Opera...]).
1. Stupid users trying to circumvent inherent security features or downloading and installing wallpapers/themes from questionable sources.
That's actually two points. Can't think of another 3.
How's that any different from Windows users attempting to do the same? There's no difference. I believe the OP is looking for Linux-centric information.
How's that any different from Windows users attempting to do the same? There's no difference. I believe the OP is looking for Linux-centric information.
OP, what say you?
I belive you're right! In which case, the only Linux (In this case Debian) centric security issue that I have been aware of is this one: http://www.debian.org/security/2008/dsa-1571
Quote:
This is caused by an incorrect Debian-specific change to the openssl package
This is the only example of a vulnerability that got any kind of coverqage in the IT news sources I frequent.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.