Linux - SecurityThis forum is for all security related questions.
Questions, tips, system compromises, firewalls, etc. are all included here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
My ISP, ATT/Yahoo (SBCGlobal) is requiring users to change from smtp or smtpauth (I've been using the latter) to smtp over SSL, by March 30. Similarly to change to POP3 over SSL.
I got Guarddog to allow POP3 over SSL and am using the new server address now. But there is no allowance in Guarddog for SMTP over SSL, and I cannot connect to send mail through the new SMTP address.
I read in a Guarddog users' group about SMTP over SSL being deprecated. That may be, but SBCGlobal/ATT/Yahoo is now going to require its use!
I don't know how to alter the IPtables by hand to allow this protocol. Please suggest what I might do; I tried Firestarter once but could not make it work in my setup. Guarddog has been perfect for about three years.
Distribution: OpenBSD 4.6, OS X 10.6.2, CentOS 4 & 5
Posts: 3,660
Rep:
The dedicated port (465/tcp) for SMTP over TLS is deprecated. Service providers should allow the START TLS command on their normal SMTP servers over the normal port (25/tcp). If AT&T isn't doing that, they're stupid and backwards.
To duplicate the firewall rule, just find your iptables script and copy the line for port 25 tcp and change the port number to 465.
The dedicated port (465/tcp) for SMTP over TLS is deprecated. Service providers should allow the START TLS command on their normal SMTP servers over the normal port (25/tcp). If AT&T isn't doing that, they're stupid and backwards.
To duplicate the firewall rule, just find your iptables script and copy the line for port 25 tcp and change the port number to 465.
Thanks, Chort, and---I agree with your first paragraph wholeheartedly! This is but one example among many... sigh ...
Chort, I got this done finally today. Not that I didn't work on other things in the meantime, like catastrophic crashes, etc.
I had the hardest time finding the iptables script. It looks as though the location varies from distro to distro, and I couldn't find the right clues. Finally found it, though, changed the "25"'s to "465"'s, and now I'm stealthed* but able to send via SMTPS using SSL and port 465 as AT&T will be requiring around March 30.
I appreciate your help very much.
------------------
* stealthed -- I know, I know. Opinions vary. But it makes me feel better. Can't hurt anything.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.