LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Security
User Name
Password
Linux - Security This forum is for all security related questions.
Questions, tips, system compromises, firewalls, etc. are all included here.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 12-08-2004, 10:47 AM   #1
IraB
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Swamp east Missouri
Distribution: FC12/ubuntu/linux mint/Debian
Posts: 27

Rep: Reputation: 15
Fedora Core 3, GRC port scan says ports arestealthed but responds to icmp ping


Hello;
I am using FC3 just as it is on the cd. I have not modified the iptables yet. I really don't know exactly what to put in there. According to GRC, my standard ports are stealthed, but the machine responds to icmp pings. Does this situation still keep me from being hacked? I am not on any network, this is a stand alone machine and I have none of the ftp, ssh, telnet, mail, www or those turned on.
I did read what gwalk was told and am going to implement some of those things.
Need any more info, let me know.
Thanks
 
Old 12-08-2004, 11:23 AM   #2
sigsegv
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Third rock from the Sun
Distribution: NetBSD-2, FreeBSD-5.4, OpenBSD-3.[67], RHEL[34], OSX 10.4.1
Posts: 1,197

Rep: Reputation: 47
Having ports open and responding to ICMP are two diffirent things. ICMP is a protocol like TCP or UDP, and is used for all kinds of things (not just ping). I know the trend is to turn ICMP off en masse, but it does have a purpose, and certain types of ICMP really should be left enabled.
 
Old 12-08-2004, 08:36 PM   #3
IraB
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Swamp east Missouri
Distribution: FC12/ubuntu/linux mint/Debian
Posts: 27

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Thanks for the response. I think I remember reading that somewhere about the icmp ping. According to the scans I have had, the ports are stealthed and do not respond. I have replaced my XP computer, it's across the room with another computer that's running Libranet. The Libranet computer is my experimental box that I try out different distros on. I am a little uncomfortable on this FC3 box as I am not sure how well ti is secured. I am trying to cut the windows umbilical cord and am a little nervous about it.
 
Old 12-08-2004, 09:53 PM   #4
Krugger
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Posts: 229

Rep: Reputation: 30
looks ok, but

what is a stealthed port?

Does it mean you are getting RST back or no reply?

And get grsecurity for you kernel + read about iptables.
 
Old 12-08-2004, 09:58 PM   #5
Krugger
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Posts: 229

Rep: Reputation: 30
I am always puzzled by the colorful language that tends to keep appearing more and more.

I am pretty sure I will be seing an IDS saying there is a clandestine channel in the network soon enough.
 
Old 12-08-2004, 10:40 PM   #6
sigsegv
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Third rock from the Sun
Distribution: NetBSD-2, FreeBSD-5.4, OpenBSD-3.[67], RHEL[34], OSX 10.4.1
Posts: 1,197

Rep: Reputation: 47
Quote:
Originally posted by Krugger
looks ok, but

what is a stealthed port?

Does it mean you are getting RST back or no reply?

And get grsecurity for you kernel + read about iptables.
Should you be telling people "looks ok" without knowing what a stealthed port is?

A stealthed port is one that sends no response at all. Despite what (self labeled) "security experts" will tell you, it's effectively like waving a big sign that says to crackers "Here's a machine that wishes it was hidden!"

iptables would eb a good place to start. Actually understanding IP and creating a set of rules that makes your machine behave as it should instead of these half assed hacks I see on the net would be a good way to make it great way to finish it.

In response to your second post there, I have no idea what you're talking about.
 
Old 12-09-2004, 04:37 AM   #7
Krugger
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Posts: 229

Rep: Reputation: 30
As he said there aren't any services running or at least they are blocked to the outside, I would say it is ok. As people can't connect to his box. So only someone sitting at the machine can hack it.

And I also like the DROP policy as it takes longer to scan as you have to wait for the connection timeout. It doesn't really help in nmap case as they use the available socket options to their advantage, but it takes a little additional time to scan.

The other post can safely be ignored.
 
Old 12-09-2004, 11:18 PM   #8
IraB
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Swamp east Missouri
Distribution: FC12/ubuntu/linux mint/Debian
Posts: 27

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Thanks guys, I appreciate the time you took to think about this. There are no services running and no network here. I prefer to keep using the Linux box so we will see what happens....Thanks again
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
msec and ICMP ping problem rjcrews Linux - Security 4 12-06-2005 06:59 AM
Fedora Core 2/BCM4309 - scan works but no IP address... webqs Linux - Wireless Networking 3 12-11-2004 08:47 PM
Can't ping - iptable problem (possibly ICMP or OUTPUT) hamish Linux - Networking 3 04-21-2004 08:30 PM
What is ICMP Ping Cyber kit 2.2 windows fotoguy Linux - Security 6 12-27-2003 06:30 PM
What is icmp port? banana2 Linux - Security 3 05-04-2003 01:45 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Security

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:05 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration