Clonezilla and Truecrypt or other encryption strategies
Linux - SecurityThis forum is for all security related questions.
Questions, tips, system compromises, firewalls, etc. are all included here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Clonezilla and Truecrypt or other encryption strategies
I am interested in converting my many Slackware linux boxes to using a product like truecrypt.
I manage the many partitions using Clonezilla, and am wondering if anyone has any pointers on the use of Clonezilla to backup, restore and move encrypted partitions?
I'm not sure that you will be particularly satisfied with software encryption. Certainly not with respect to backups, which have no choice except to either back-up the entire encrypted file (which it cannot read), or to back-up copies of data from the encrypted volume (which it can read) ... meaning that Eve merely needs to steal the backups, instead.
You can buy disk drives that have hardware encryption support built-in. The drives are "useless if stolen."
My linux systems use LUKS on the partitions and files are backed up in the clear to a secondary encrypted device as well as encrypted and backed up to an unencrypted device. The encryption overhead on a reasonably modern system is minimal and generally unnoticeable.
Backups become an issue as stated above where you have to decide whether to backup the data in the clear to an encrypted device or encrypted to any device. The choice will largely be influenced by the type of data being stored, how much data needs to be stored, how the backups will be physically stored (and where) and why it is being encrypted.
Unfortunately, there is no "one size fits all" when it comes to backups, storage and encryption.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.