Linux - Security This forum is for all security related questions.
Questions, tips, system compromises, firewalls, etc. are all included here. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
03-28-2006, 12:53 PM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: ~
Distribution: Ubuntu 10.04
Posts: 843
Rep:
|
chkrootkit suckit initng infected network 8%
My network is constantly used at 8%, except when I run tcpdump, ethereal, or otherwise start using the internet and computer.
I ran chkrootkit, and while I'm in initng, it tells me that /sbin/init is infected. If I run the init old generation, it doesn't say that /sbin/init is infected...
I'm security conscious and my first idea is to compare another ubuntu machine I have, and then to reformat and reinstall (aaaaaarrrgg!!)...
Advice greatly appreciated.
|
|
|
03-28-2006, 04:03 PM
|
#2
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: ~
Distribution: Ubuntu 10.04
Posts: 843
Original Poster
Rep:
|
I'm guessing:
8% because of lo activity, or bug in the applet
netstat returns no listening ports except on lo
tcpdump on everything and ethereal reports a few packets on lo, and nothing on ath0, eth0, sit0, and wifi0, even with interface (except lo) disabled.
initng created the false alarm because (possibly) chkrootkit is not programmed to handle a different init.
The other ubuntu machine reports that dhcpclient is promiscuous on that computer too (I've thought so).
The other thing would be my paranoia with security and computer health and performance... I need a vacation?
|
|
|
03-28-2006, 04:37 PM
|
#3
|
Moderator
Registered: May 2001
Posts: 29,415
|
initng created the false alarm because (possibly) chkrootkit is not programmed to handle a different init.
If all checks out fine (minimally the md5sums on the package and the binary), I'd say mail the false positive report to the maintainer.
The other ubuntu machine reports that dhcpclient is promiscuous on that computer too
That's a known situation. If you kill dhcpclient and it's still in promisc mode and there's no other libcap app listening (use /sbin/ip instead of ifconfig) *then* investigate.
|
|
|
03-28-2006, 04:50 PM
|
#4
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: ~
Distribution: Ubuntu 10.04
Posts: 843
Original Poster
Rep:
|
the md5 of initng the debian package is the same as the one in /sbin/initng.
*edit* I'll file a bug report... meanwhile and inside a day, a new initng just came out*/edit*
the dhcp client was killed, and no promiscuosity was reported.
That leaves pananoia... By the way, these are good methods... I'll remember those...
Last edited by mimithebrain; 03-28-2006 at 04:52 PM.
Reason: bug report, and new initng
|
|
|
03-29-2006, 10:39 AM
|
#5
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: ~
Distribution: Ubuntu 10.04
Posts: 843
Original Poster
Rep:
|
The "8% activity network" has been solved:
My card, perhaps being promiscuous because of the dhcp client, kept on receiving a steady flow of packets from a peer in my network that was intended for another computer outside the network...
I can rest now
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:01 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|